LGBT March on Washington has potential to reignite the full force of the gay rights movement

LGBT March on Washington has potential to reignite the full force of the gay rights movement

A demonstrator holds a rainbow flag up to the fence surrounding the White House in Washington, DC during the National Equality March for LGBT rights in October 2009. Photo by Tony Webster (Via Wikimedia Commons, CC 4.0).

The Women’s March on Washington brought millions of women, men, and children out into the streets to demonstrate for progressive ideals.

Included in those stated unity principals is the fight for LGBTQIA rights:

We firmly declare that LGBTQIA Rights are Human Rights and that it is our obligation to uplift, expand and protect the rights of our gay, lesbian, bi, queer, trans or gender non-conforming brothers, sisters and siblings. We must have the power to control our bodies and be free from gender norms, expectations and stereotypes.

The huge turnout and success of the March on Washington, and the sister rallies around the globe, has inspired a National Pride March, a “mass” LGBTQ protest at the nation’s capital on June 11, as it coincides with Capital Pride’s June 8-11 weekend of events.

David Bruinooge, 42, lives in New York, and has friends in D.C. He was moved to start a Facebook event page announcing the event while watching the Women’s March on Washington.

“I was watching the events unfold on TV and I was very proud and inspired by all the women, the strong women in our country who were kind of taking this to the street and getting their voices heard,” he told the Washington Blade. “And in the back of my mind as an openly gay man I thought the gay community should be doing something like this to follow up on the momentum.”

This would mark the first large-scale LGBTQ march on Washington since the National Equality March in 2009. Still the largest march occurred in 1993, called the March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation. Estimates of the crowd size vary, with organizers estimating a million in attendance, with the D.C. Police Department coming up with a similar count of 800,000 to over one million.

The first such demonstration, the National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights, took place in 1979, which drew around 125,000.

A button from the 1979 march. Via Vampiress144 on Wikimedia Commons (CC 3.0).

Organizers are encouraging those living in cities with pride events that coincide to consider staying put and attending those local offerings while marching in solidarity with those in D.C.

“Or even it doesn’t fall on the same weekend. We can all march in solidarity across the country,” the Facebook post continues. “Our community is large enough to fill all the Pride Events scheduled that weekend. And we will make this truly a ‘National Pride March’ together.”

This is a wise move, because it not only manages to avoid the issue of undermining the work local groups have done, but also helps set up a sister rally approach, which was successful for the Women’s March. It means that not only will media outlets report on the big event in Washington, they will be able to cover related demonstrations taking place in their own backyards, increasing total coverage.

There has been a growing sense, especially among the older generation, that a sense of complacency had set in among the LGBTQ community and our allies. After all, there have been so many advances in the fight for rights since the days of the Compton’s Cafeteria and Stonewall riots.

A whole generation of LGBTQ youth have no idea what it must have been like during the height of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, having seen your loved ones dying around you while your government appears to be sitting idly by, doing nothing. Many are still unfamiliar with the heroic efforts of ACT UP, who put their bodies on the line to raise awareness and force the government to take action in the fight against the illness.

Those who still need a lesson in that bit of history should check out the excellent documentary, “How to Survive a Plague,” based on a book of the same name, which is currently available to stream on Netflix.

The fight for same-sex marriage was waged and won, Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repealed, and hate crime legislation was signed into law by President Obama, leading many to believe we had reached equality, even in spite of a lack of LGBTQ protections on the federal level, with The Equality Act continuing to languish in Congress.

Gay bars and clubs have even started vanishing, in part because people seemed to believe there was no longer a need for dedicated spaces for us and our allies.

Rainbow Capitol Building, via National Pride March on Facebook.

The argument that there is more or less nothing to fight for, while always erroneous, is more obviously flawed now than ever.

President Donald Trump has filled his administration with individuals with a history of anti-LGBTQ views and voting records, and his Supreme Court nomination list is equally disconcerting.

The new WhiteHouse.gov has no reference of LGBTQ rights, unlike its predecessor which is now housed at ObamaWhiteHouse.gov.

The Centers for Disease Control reportedly shelved plans for an LGBTQ youth summit over concerns with how Trump would view the event.

There are also reports that The White House Office of National AIDS Policy has been closed.

Further, Trump has also said he would sign the First Amendment Defense Act into law, which would allow for religious based discrimination in such areas as healthcare, businesses, employment, and housing. His pick for Attorney General, Sen. Jeff Sessions, also recently defended the bill.

President Trump also has an admiration for the so-called leadership of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who signed a “gay propaganda” law in 2013, making demonstrations like the LGBT March on Washington illegal in his country.

Adviser Kellyanne Conway said Trump and Putin will speak on Jan. 28 to discuss areas where they might have “common ground.”

If there were ever a time to wake up, stand up, and fight back together, now is that time. Before it is too late.

See you all in D.C.

www.queerty.com/lgbt-march-washington-potential-reignite-full-force-gay-rights-movement-20170128?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Refugees Detained at U.S. Airports as Trump’s Draconian Order is Legally Challenged: VIDEO

Refugees Detained at U.S. Airports as Trump’s Draconian Order is Legally Challenged: VIDEO

An unknown number of refugees from seven countries named by Donald Trump in an executive order issued late on Friday are currently being detained in legal limbo at U.S. airports.

The order, which is dubbed Protection of the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry in the United States, can be read in full here.

The Guardian reports:

With a simple stroke of his pen, the president issued what he dubbed “extreme vetting” measures intended to “keep terrorists out” of the United States – the details of which were even more severe than had been expected….

…The action puts in place a 90-day block on entry to the US from citizens from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia. It is unclear whether the measure would apply to citizens of those countries on trips abroad who already have permission to live and work in the US.

It suspends the admittance of all refugees to the US for a period of 120 days, and terminates indefinitely all refugee admissions from Syria, where the nearly six-year war under Bashar al-Assad’s regime has led to more than 500,000 civilian deaths and created the displacement of an estimated 11 million Syrians.

It also caps the total number of refugees entering the US in 2017 to 50,000 – less than half the previous year’s figure of 117,000.

The fallout has already begun.

At U.S. airports:

The detentions prompted legal challenges as lawyers representing two Iraqis held at Kennedy Airport filed a writ of habeas corpus early Saturday in the Eastern District of New York seeking to have their clients released. At the same time, they filed a motion for class certification, in an effort to represent all refugees and immigrants who they said were being unlawfully detained at ports of entry…

…It was unclear how many refugees and immigrants were being held nationwide in the aftermath of the executive order. The complaints were filed by a prominent group including the American Civil Liberties Union, the International Refugee Assistance Project at the Urban Justice Center, the National Immigration Law Center, Yale Law School’s Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization and the firm Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.

The lead plaintiffs have been detained by U.S. government & threatened w/ deportation even though they have valid visas to enter the U.S.

— ACLU National (@ACLU) January 28, 2017

One plaintiff, for example, worked for the U.S. military and his life was in danger in his home country due to that relationship.

— ACLU National (@ACLU) January 28, 2017

Our other plaintiff was also threatened because of perceived ties to the United States.

— ACLU National (@ACLU) January 28, 2017

Google has ordered more than 100 employees back to the United States and condemned the order:

Google Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai slammed Trump’s move in a note to employees Friday, telling them that more than 100 company staff are affected by the order.

“It’s painful to see the personal cost of this executive order on our colleagues,” Pichai wrote in the memo, a copy of which was obtained by Bloomberg News. “We’ve always made our view on immigration issues known publicly and will continue to do so.”

The comments underscore a growing rift between the Trump administration and several large U.S. technology companies, which include many immigrants in their ranks and have lobbied for fewer immigration restrictions. Pichai’s note echoed similar statements from tech peers voicing concerns about the harm such policies could have on their businesses.

Oscar-nominated director Asghar Farhadi will not be able to attend the Oscar ceremony:

Farhadi’s film The Salesman is nominated in the Foreign Language category alongside Land of Mine (Denmark), Toni Erdmann (Germany), It’s Only the End of the World (Canada) and Tanna (Australia). The film follows a high school teacher (Shahab Hosseini) who seeks revenge against the perpetrator who attacked his wife (Taraneh Alidoosti) in their apartment.

The post Refugees Detained at U.S. Airports as Trump’s Draconian Order is Legally Challenged: VIDEO appeared first on Towleroad.


Refugees Detained at U.S. Airports as Trump’s Draconian Order is Legally Challenged: VIDEO

Customer writes antigay slur on receipt instead of tipping

Customer writes antigay slur on receipt instead of tipping

A good rule of thumb while out on a date: notice how that person treats the server, and if they’re overly rude, run.

So, imagine if your date happened to leave an antigay slur for your waiter instead of a tip. It sounds unfathomable, but we’ve written about the phenomenon so many times over the years that it’s become its own sort of miserable micro-trend.

Related: No Tip? IHOP Waitress Finds “Gay Is Wrong!” Written On Her Receipt

The latest example comes from Louisville, Kentucky, where a local server at Buffalo Wild Wings on Westport Road claims he received a homophobic remark on his receipt in lieu of gratuity.

Kyle Griffith says he was waiting on two young girls that night, and it was a typical evening until he went to pick up the check, where he found a handwritten message.

Related: Portland Apple Store Prints Receipt For “F*g” Customer, Declines To Rectify Situation

“And it said ‘Sorry I don’t tip fa**ots,’ and then said ‘#UNeedJesus,’ and it just crushed me that someone could say something like that,” Griffith tells WDRB. .

“I depend on those tips to be able to pay my bills and everything else,” he says. “To live, to eat, everything.” Griffith said.

So Griffith decided to post a photo of the receipt on Facebook, though he was gracious enough not to call her out by name.

Related: What This Restaurant Thinks Of Your Fairy Drink Order

“I woke up the next day,” he says, “and saw that it was being shared a whole lot more than I ever thought it would.”

He hopes his story raises awareness about the hate he occasionally faces.

“I want to be able to tell everyone that this is not a lie, that this is truth, this is an everyday happening,” he says. ”It’s an occurrence that … can’t happen any longer. It’s got to stop. The hate has to stop. There’s no reason for it.”

Related: Straight Dudes Mistaken For “Gay” On Receipt, Call It “Racism”

In a statement on Tuesday evening, Buffalo Wild Wings wrote:

We’re disappointed to learn about the comment left on a receipt by a Guest at one of our independently owned franchise locations in Louisville recently. Because Buffalo Wild Wings is about creating a great guest experience, we feel strongly that our restaurant environment needs to be respectful in order to provide the experience that our Guests and Team Members expect and deserve.

Griffith is quick to point out that management “had his back,” which is good to hear, especially since the restaurant came under fire for this 2011 advertisement:

Related: Is Buffalo Wild Wings’ New Slogan Promoting Homophobia? Or Just An Awful Attempt At Humor?

“They told me that if I needed anything I could come and talk to them, so it’s just been amazing outpour of support and love from everybody around,” he says.

And apparently the customer has since apologized.

Related: Lesbian Waitress Receives Nasty Note About Her “Lifestyle” In Place Of Tip

“She did apologize and said that it was a joke,” he says, “and that it shouldn’t have been a joke and that she felt bad for it. It’s not something you should joke about. My sexual preference at all shouldn’t be something someone should joke about.”

Strangely, Griffith’s original post was reported as offensive and is now hidden. Prior to Facebook acting like Facebook, the story was shared hundreds of times.

www.queerty.com/customer-writes-antigay-slur-receipt-instead-tipping-20170128?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

潘基文氏「LGBTを支持しない」宗教票目当てに豹変か 国連時代は積極的だったのに…

潘基文氏「LGBTを支持しない」宗教票目当てに豹変か 国連時代は積極的だったのに…
「LGBTを支持するということではなく、彼らの人権、人格が差別されてはいけない」???

もっと見る: 国際, 韓国, 潘基文, 潘基文 国連事務総長, Lgbt, 韓国 LGBT, 韓国大統領選, 韓国 大統領選挙, キリスト教, プロテスタント, 韓国 キリスト教, Japan News

www.huffingtonpost.jp/2017/01/28/ban-ki-moon-lgbt_n_14454464.html