Jehovah's Witness Leader Preaches Against Tight Pants, Says Gays are Pushing Them: AUDIO

Jehovah's Witness Leader Preaches Against Tight Pants, Says Gays are Pushing Them: AUDIO

Morris

Anthony Morris III, a member of the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses, recently gave a sermon against tight pants.

SuitGod hates them, and by the way, they’re designed by homosexuals.

Morris first warns the women:

“Some of our sisters – what it is are these spanx – these skin tight stuff they wear – when they exercise – they leave their home and they’re jogging in this stuff. Look at the verse. Is that appropriate to wear skin tight spanx or whatever they call it? It’s not modest and it’s certainly not sound of mind. It’s really not appropriate. There’s really nothing else to say about it. Now you want to be in your home or your room and wear that stuff that’s your business. But don’t go out like that and say you worship the true God.”

And then he warns the men:

“And the other one that needs addressing is for these young fellas, cause the older ones aren’t doing much of it thankfully, is the metrosexual look we’ve addressed that in the past. What’s happened now is that it’s really caught on more – the tight suit jacket and the tight pants. Better known as tight pants. They are tight all the way down to the ankles. It’s not appropriate. It’s not sound of mind.”

And then (leaving his congregation in stitches) he goes after the gays:

“The homosexuals that are designing these clothes – they’d like you in tight pants.”

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP


Andy Towle

www.towleroad.com/2014/11/morris.html

Is The Advocate Just Trolling Us By Making Vladimir Putin Its Person Of The Year?

Is The Advocate Just Trolling Us By Making Vladimir Putin Its Person Of The Year?

Vladimir Putin Person of the YearThe Advocate got a lot of attention last year for making Pope Francis its Person of the Year on the wispiest of arguments (actually, just five words: “Who am I to judge?”). This year, the magazine has gone from heaven to hell: it’s chosen Vladimir Putin as its Person of the Year. Putin graces the magazine cover with this new title cutely arranged as a Hitler-type mustache.

Apparently, Adolf was unavailable this year.

“Driving the governmental, religious, and popular disdain for gays and lesbians, the Russian president became the single greatest threat to LGBTs in the world in 2014,” the magazine proclaims.

You can’t argue that Putin is one of the most despicable creatures on the face of the earth. But at this point you have to wonder if The Advocate is just trolling us by picking the most outrageous person it can imagine.

The stated criteria for being the Person of the Year is being that special someone who was “most influential on LGBT lives during 2014.” The nine other finalists are a celebrity-heavy list (Neil Patrick Harris, Laverne Cox, Robin Roberts, Anna Paquin, Ellen Page), with one congregation–the United Church of Christ–as the stand-in for marriage equality.

Which raises the question: can’t The Advocate find any actual activists?

This isn’t to badmouth any of the finalists, although two of them, Tim Cook and Robin Roberts, have previously served as spokesmodels for the glass closet. But there are a lot of people who aren’t Oscar winners, multi-millionaires, or Tony hosts who have done a lot for their community too.

How about Mark Zmuda, who was fired from his job at a Catholic high school and sued, because the school found out he got married? Or John Abdallah Wambere, who faced death by being an out gay man in Uganda?

Or how about the activists in Russia who risk their lives to fight for their rights? You know, the people actually standing up to Putin.

The Advocate is clearly trying to emulate Time, whose person of the year is chosen based on who most influenced the news. But Time doesn’t pretend to represent the interests of an entire community the way The Advocate does. Moreover, The Advocate’s did have a long-standing tradition of choosing as Person of the Year someone who advanced the goals and visibility of the LGBT movement, like fighting the religious right or being one of the heroes of September 11.

Now, of course, it’s about getting clicks by being as outrageous as possible. Vladimir Putin will be hard to top (no jokes, please). But Phil Robertson is still available. Imagine the clicks The Advocate would get from that.

JohnGallagher

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/cXhkGAcaQCk/is-the-advocate-just-trolling-us-by-making-vladimir-putin-its-person-of-the-year-20141110

Gay Marriage News Watch: TN, KY, MI, OH, WV, KS, MO, SC – VIDEO

Gay Marriage News Watch: TN, KY, MI, OH, WV, KS, MO, SC – VIDEO

Screen Shot 2014-11-10 at 6.12.40 AM

AFER’s Matt Baume reports on the Sixth Circuit’s anti-equality ruling, West Virginia, Kansas, and Missouri’s gay marriage bans being overturned in court, and a look back at all the great LGBT progress this past month.

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2014/11/gay-marriage-news-watch-tn-ky-mi-oh-wv-ks-mo-sc-video.html

Sixth Circuit Sets up Supreme Court for Marriage Ruling

Sixth Circuit Sets up Supreme Court for Marriage Ruling
Last month, the Supreme Court indicated that it didn’t want to wade into the gay-marriage debate unless there were contradictory decisions amongst lower courts. Well, last week they got their wish.

After a year in which federal courts have almost unanimously overturned marriage bans, the Sixth Circuit has now become the first federal appellate court to uphold such a ban. Writing for the majority, Judge Jeffrey Sutton ruled that federal courts should afford a high degree of deference to voters and politicians when it comes to deciding the constitutionality of laws.

That flies in the face of decisions from multiple other circuits. The Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth have all ruled that marriage bans are unconstitutional violations of the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses.

That means that the circuits are now in disagreement on whether marriage bans violate the U.S. Constitution. The time would appear to be ripe for the Supreme Court to step in and settle the matter, particularly since more litigation is pending in other states: Texas and Louisiana are due for a marriage ruling early in 2015.

The next step is for the Sixth Circuit plaintiffs to file petitions with the Supreme Court, which they have already indicated they plan to do. Those petitions are likely to come sometime within the next few weeks. The Supreme Court would then have to decide whether or not to take up the case, but there’s no timeline for them to make that decision. They could defer a decision until 2015, or even 2016 if they wanted to take a slow approach.

In the mean time, equality organizers might need to start planning to overturn marriage at the ballot and in legislatures in certain states if the marriage bans aren’t overturned soon by the Supreme Court.

www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-baume/sixth-circuit-sets-up-sup_b_6131442.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices