‘Cruel Intentions: The Musical’ Is a Wicked Delight for ‘90s Lovers: REVIEW

‘Cruel Intentions: The Musical’ Is a Wicked Delight for ‘90s Lovers: REVIEW

cruel intentions musical

These are tough times for sordid sex dramas — especially one involving coercion, deceit, and minors (oh, my!). Les Liaisons Dangereuses, last on Broadway in 2016, just barely gets away with it for being French, set hundreds of years ago, and featuring adults. Cruel Intentions, the 1999 movie that transfers the latter’s ruthless plot of erotic conquest to would-be Gossip Girl Manhattan, is great fun — but also vacuous and a bit perverse.

Cruel Intentions: The Musical (aptly billed as a “musical nightlife experience”), which opened downtown last night at (Le) Poisson Rouge, solves all that with a clever and often inspired score of ‘90s pop-rock favorites, whose emo lyrics have never made more sense. (If they ever made sense at all: It’s been decades since we gave up trying to decipher “Genie in a Bottle” or “Sex and Candy.”) The musical’s nostalgic score actually brings the story to new heights, supplanting some of its empty cruelty with exactly the kind of soaring, confusing emotions that color teen romance.

Pop music is practically — if not explicitly — made for lending words and major chords to teenage drama of epic proportions. Co-creators Jordan Ross and Lindsey Rosin (who also directs) assemble a spot-on score of ‘90s gems that accompanied a whole generation of sexual and romantic awakenings, from the smitten passion of Sixpence None the Richer’s “Kiss Me” and The Cardigans’ “Lovefool” to defiant anthems from Garbage and Melissa Etheridge. Some are made into duets, others serve as earnest ballads of self-expression.

Quick primer on this prep school saga: Step-siblings Kathryn (a fierce and corseted Lauren Zakrin) and Sebastian (a built, square-jawed Constantine Rousouli) have a Cersei and Jaime Lannister thing going. Their grand scheme involves Kathryn exacting revenge on her ex, Sebastian deflowering the principal’s daughter, and a wager where if Kathryn wins, she gets his Jaguar, and if Sebastian wins, he gets, well.. another kind of sweet ride involving Kathryn.

Their pawns are Sebastian’s viginal conquest Annette (Carrie St. Louis, theme song: No Doubt’s “I’m Just a Girl”) the naive-turned-nasty Cecile (Jessie Shelton), and her Black music teacher Ronald (Matthew Griffin) — who get together to the tune of Deep Blue Something’s “Breakfast at Tiffany’s.” In an expanded gay subplot, the entrapment turned romance between hipster Blaine (Spring Awakening’s Alex Boniello) and football player Greg (Brian Muller) brilliantly unfolds to boy band hits “I Want it That Way” and “Bye, Bye, Bye.”

Not every number is a home run. TLC’s “No Scrubs” is greeted by the same nostalgic yelps as all the others, but it doesn’t land, or do much to solve the problem of Cecil’s racist mother (Patricia Richardson of Home Improvement fame). When Griffin’s Ronald reprises the song as a sort of clapback, it makes even less sense.

The screenplay by Roger Kumble (also one of the musical’s creators) remains with its most iconic lines in tact (e.g. Cecile: “He took down my pants and started writing the alphabet, but he was writing it with his tongue.). The West Village club setting, in addition to being ideal for the young ensemble’s belting talents, is a perfect homage to the movie’s ‘90s Manhattan milieu. The production premiered two years ago in L.A., where it earned seals of approval from the film’s stars Sarah-Michelle Gellar, Reese Witherspoon and Selma Blair. After a pop-up performance here in February, fortunately for nostalgic New Yorkers, Cruel Intentions: The Musical has come home to roost.

Recent theatre features…
How to Save Civilization from Certain Disaster? Take a Cue from ‘SpongeBob’ on Broadway (Yes, Seriously): REVIEW
In Broadway Revival of ‘Once on This Island,’ a Modern Fable, Beautifully Told: REVIEW
Uma Thurman Opens in ‘The Parisian Woman,’ a Fiction That’s No Match for Reality: REVIEW
Amy Schumer Rains Down Laughs in Steve Martin’s Curious ‘Meteor Shower’: REVIEW
In Drew Droege’s ‘Bright Colors And Bold Patterns,’ a Hilarious Portrait of Living Out Loud: REVIEW
In New Musical ‘The Band’s Visit,’ an Exquisite Meditation on Hopes Won and Lost: REVIEW
Julie Taymor Directs Clive Owen in Stylish but Earthbound ‘M. Butterfly’ on Broadway: REVIEW

Follow Naveen Kumar on Twitter: @Mr_NaveenKumar
(photos: jenny anderson)

The post ‘Cruel Intentions: The Musical’ Is a Wicked Delight for ‘90s Lovers: REVIEW appeared first on Towleroad.


‘Cruel Intentions: The Musical’ Is a Wicked Delight for ‘90s Lovers: REVIEW

Did E.T. Send Us Our First Interstellar Asteroid? Scientists Search for Communication Signal

Did E.T. Send Us Our First Interstellar Asteroid? Scientists Search for Communication Signal
oumuamua

oumuamua

Artist impression of Oumuamua / ESO / M. Kornmesser

Scientists have been watching ‘Oumuamua, the first known interstellar asteroid, with fascination since it landed on their screens in October. And beginning on Wednesday, a team will be studying it in search of something that would make the object even more groundbreaking: signals indicating it is in communication with extraterrestrial intelligent life. That decision is based…

The post Did E.T. Send Us Our First Interstellar Asteroid? Scientists Search for Communication Signal appeared first on Towleroad.


Did E.T. Send Us Our First Interstellar Asteroid? Scientists Search for Communication Signal

SPD-Chef Schulz erwägt nie da gewesenes Koalitionsmodell

SPD-Chef Schulz erwägt nie da gewesenes Koalitionsmodell
SPD-Chef Martin Schulz auf dem Parteitag in Berlin.

  • SPD-Chef Schulz erwägt offenbar ein Regierungsmodell, bei dem nur bestimmte Projekte in einem Koalitionsvertrag verankert werden
  • Das Modell soll Gegner einer großen Koalition einer seiner Partei von einer Zusammenarbeit mit der Union überzeugen

SPD-Chef Martin Schulz erwägt offenbar eine nie da gewesene Form der Regierungszusammenarbeit.

Angesichts des Widerstands gegen eine große Koalition in seiner Partei prüfe der Vorsitzende ein Modell, bei dem nur bestimmte Projekte im Koalitionsvertrag verankert werden, andere aber bewusst offen bleiben, damit sie im Bundestag diskutiert und ausverhandelt werden – das würde mehr Raum geben zur Profilierung.

Dieses Modell habe Schulz am Montag in der Fraktionssitzung erläutert, berichtet die Deutsche Presse-Agentur.

So könnten auch aktuelle Strömungen in der Gesellschaft in den vier Jahren einer solchen Regierungskooperation aufgenommen werden, erläuterte Schulz demnach. 

“Das wäre eventuell eine Brücke, über die viele in der SPD gehen könnten”, hieß es. 

Die Sozialdemokraten fürchten um ihr Profil

Die SPD macht unter anderem die Beteiligung an der großen Koalition in den vergangenen vier Jahren für ihr schlechtes Ergebnis bei der Bundestagswahl verantwortlich.

Die Sozialdemokraten fürchten, ohne stärkere Profilierungsmöglichkeiten wieder als Verlierer aus einer großen Koalition zu gehen. 

Wenn bestimmte Themen offen bleiben, könnte die SPD – so das Kalkül – beim Ringen um Projekte deutlicher machen, wer wofür steht und was auf wessen Betreiben durchgesetzt wird, notfalls auch mit anderen Mehrheiten. Als ein Beispiel gilt die gegen die Union durchgesetzte sogenannte Ehe für alle, die auch Schwulen und Lesben die Ehe ermöglicht hat. 

Merkel will schnell “stabile Regierung”

Es ist allerdings unwahrscheinlich, dass ein Modell, wie von Schulz vorgeschlagen, von der Union akzeptiert werden würde. Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel (CDU) machte am Montag in Berlin deutlich, zügige Gespräche für eine “stabile Regierung” aufnehmen zu wollen. 

Spekulationen über eine Minderheitsregierung der Union, wie sie auch aus den eigenen Reihen geäußert wurden, trat Merkel erneut entgegen.

Am Mittwoch treffen sich die Vorsitzenden der CDU, CSU und SPD, um über eine Regierungsbildung zu sprechen.

SPD-Fraktionschefin Andrea Nahles sagte am Montag, bei diesem Gespräch werde noch nicht über eine große Koalition oder Minderheitsregierung entschieden.

 

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/spd-chef-schulz-erwagt-nie-da-gewesenes-koalitionsmodell_de_5a2f1c57e4b07895028302f3

Girls Still Regularly Facing Sexual Harassment At School, Disturbing Report Underlines

Girls Still Regularly Facing Sexual Harassment At School, Disturbing Report Underlines
More than a third of girls have suffered sexual harassment at school, a disturbing new report reveals.

The research from the National Education Union and UK Feminista shines a light on an epidemic of sexism behind the UK’s school gates.

Sixth form students hear sexist language regularly and gender stereotyping happens “on a weekly basis” at primary schools, the ‘It’s just everywhere: Sexism in schools and how we tackle it’ report says.

The NEU also calls on Ofsted to target the problem and for the Government to give schools more resources for projects to combat the rising tide of sexism.

Findings include:

It also mirrors the findings of a Parliamentary report on the issue more than a year ago, suggesting little is changing.

Women and Equalities Committee chair Maria Miller MP and fellow committee member Gavin Shuker, a Labour MP, will launch the report in Parliament today.

A total of 1,508 students and 1,634 teachers were questioned about their experiences and views on sexism in schools.

Miller says: “Without doubt, there is clear evidence that sexual harassment is blighting the lives of girls in our schools. It is worryingly ‘normalised’ and often goes unreported.”

The committee’s own report detailed how widespread sexual harassment and sexual violence had become.

Miller adds: “Fourteen months on from our report, schools seem no better placed to tackle the problem than they were then. We made many recommendations and ministers urgently need to review the guidance, support and resources made available and send a clear message to schools that girls’ safety and equality must be prioritised.  

“Government has to take urgent action on this problem. Negative stereotypes, sexist attitudes, expectations about relationships and sexual harassment and violence not only impact on children’s lives, but create problems in later life.” 

The new report calls for the Government to issue national guidance to schools on how to prevent and respond effectively to sexual harassment and sexual violence, and ensure teachers receive the necessary training, resources and support to develop a whole school strategy. 

Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretary at the NEU, says: “As we come to the end of 2017, we’ve lived through a year in which sexual harassment of women and girls has been at the forefront of the public eye.

“This study shows us how normalised and pervasive it is for young people also. Sexual harassment and regular sexist remarks are patterns that most girls and young women come to view as ‘normal’.”

Schools need more resources to respond to the concerns, he adds.

“Schools and colleges have an important role to play in breaking down stereotypes but education policy is making it harder and not easier. We are not giving schools and teachers the tools, time and teaching environments they need.

“The Government, alongside the profession, needs to develop teacher training about the best ways to reduce sexism in the classroom and to use the formal and informal curriculum to make a difference for girls and boys. In this study, only one in five teachers say the national curriculum gives them adequate scope and flexibility to enable schools to prevent sexism.”

Sophie Bennett, spokesperson for UK Feminista, says: “The solutions are clear; what has been lacking is the political will to act. All those with the power to make schools safe for girls must now step up – from Downing Street to the staff room.

“We need to stop schools being places where girls and boys learn that sexual harassment and sexism are routine, normal, accepted. It would transform school life – and society as a whole.”

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/sexism-inschools_uk_5a2ea1b0e4b073789f6b85cd

Victory! Court Orders U.S. Military to Immediately Halt Ban of Transgender Troops

Victory! Court Orders U.S. Military to Immediately Halt Ban of Transgender Troops

Today, a federal court in Seattle ordered an immediate halt to the Trump Administration’s discriminatory plan to ban transgender people from serving openly in the U.S. Armed Services. The ruling came in the lawsuit brought by Lambda Legal and OutServe-SLDN challenging the ban and prevents the ban from being implemented while the case proceeds.

“There is no valid reason to deny transgender people the right to serve their country. The court heard that argument, and agreed,” Lambda Legal Senior Attorney Peter Renn said. “Before the President’s vicious attack on transgender Americans, transgender service members had been serving openly and proudly in every branch of the U.S. Military. Today’s ruling allows them to continue to do the job of defending our country while the case continues. With yet another court ruling that the President has engaged in unlawful discrimination, the policy’s days are clearly numbered, and its final demise can’t come fast enough for those whose military careers hang in the balance.”

Today’s ruling came in response to the motion for a preliminary injunction Lambda Legal and OutServe-SLDN filed in September in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The motion asked the Court to preliminarily enjoin the government from taking actions inconsistent with the military policy that existed prior to July 26, 2017, under which transgender service members were allowed to serve openly, and transgender Americans seeking to join the military had a path forward for doing so.

“I’m incredibly relieved to know that I can continue to do my job and serve our nation without the additional stress of worrying that I could be discharged as soon as next March,” Staff Sergeant Cathrine Schmid said. “Being transgender has no impact on my ability to perform my duties, and I’m grateful that I will be able to continue to serve the people of the United States as this case moves through the courts.”

“The President’s ‘guidance’ to remove transgender service members from the United States armed forces and deny them healthcare was nothing less than the initiation of a purge,” OutServe-SLDN Legal Director Peter Perkowski said. “This court has recognized the President’s action for what it is–a discriminatory attack on the people who have volunteered their lives for the defense of the country. Qualified and dedicated individuals serve our country each and every day in the armed services and thousands happen to be transgender. An individual’s gender identity is not a valid reason to deny them the right to serve their country in uniform; a fact even the Pentagon has affirmed. Judge Pechman’s ruling today is a testament to that argument and a step to reassure our transgender service members that this country will have their backs even if the Commander-in-Chief does not.”

In the lawsuit, Lambda Legal and OutServe-SLDN represent nine individual plaintiffs and three organizational plaintiffs. The individual plaintiffs, all of whom are transgender, include:

  • Staff Sergeant Cathrine (“Katie”) Schmid, a 33-year-old woman and 12-year member of the U.S. Army currently serving in Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, who has applied to become an Army Warrant Officer;
  • Petty Officer Terece Lewis, a 33-year-old woman and 14-year member of the U.S. Navy serving on the U.S.S. John C. Stennis out of Bremerton, Washington;
  • Chief Warrant Officer Lindsey Muller, a 35-year-old woman and 17-year member of the U.S. Army serving at Camp Humphreys near Seoul, South Korea;
  • Petty Officer Second Class Phillip Stephens, a 30-year-old man and five-year member of the U.S. Navy serving at Eglin Air Force Base near Valparaiso, Florida;
  • Petty Officer Second Class Megan Winters, a 29-year-old woman and five-year member of the U.S. Navy serving in the Office of Naval Intelligence in Washington, D.C.;
  • Ryan Karnoski, a 23-year-old Seattle man who currently works as a social worker and wishes to become an officer doing social work for the military;
  • Conner Callahan, a 29-year-old man who currently works in law enforcement in North Carolina;
  • Drew Layne, a recent high-school graduate from Corpus Christi, Texas, who is 17 years old and, with parental support, wants to join the Air Force; and
  • A ninth individual currently serving in the military who remains anonymous.

The organizational plaintiffs are the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Seattle-based Gender Justice League, and the American Military Partner Association (AMPA), who joined the lawsuit on behalf of their transgender members harmed by the ban.

In October, a U.S. District Court judge in Washington, D.C., granted a preliminary injunction in a similar lawsuit challenging the transgender military service ban filed by the National Center for Lesbian Rights and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, and in November, a U.S. District Court judge in Maryland granted a preliminary injunction in a case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The lawsuit is Karnoski v. Trump. Read more about the case here: www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/karnoski-v-trump

The Lambda Legal attorneys working on the case are: Peter Renn, Jon W. Davidson, Camilla B. Taylor, Tara Borelli, Natalie Nardecchia, Sasha Buchert, Kara Ingelhart, and Carl Charles. They are joined by co-counsel Peter Perkowski of OutServe-SLDN. Also on the legal team are pro-bono co-counsel at Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Newman Du Wors LLP.

“Today’s preliminary injunction is a victory in the fight against Donald Trump and Mike Pence’s cruel and animus-fueled policy,” said HRC National Press Secretary Sarah McBride. “Allowing this discriminatory ban to take effect would cause serious harm to our national defense and to the thousands of transgender people serving and wishing to serve their country. We thank Lambda Legal and Outserve-SLDN for representing us in this landmark case, and we are grateful that Judge Pechman has ruled against discrimination.”

“We’re thankful for this judge’s decision which gives us hope that justice will prevail,” said AMPA President Ashley Broadway-Mack. “Our transgender service members and their families deserve better than to be singled out by the Trump-Pence administration for discrimination. They deserve better than the uncertainty, fear, and turmoil President Trump’s transgender ban has inflicted on their lives. At the end of the day, what matters is whether or not someone is qualified and willing to serve, not their gender identity.”

“Gender Justice League is relieved by this injunction and the justice that it has served for our members,” said Gender Justice League Executive Director Danni Askini. “We have seen our members’ lives thrown into chaos since the July tweets barring open transgender service. We hope that this is the first step in bringing closure to this case and serving justice and equality for our members and their families who have been deeply impacted by the ban on transgender military service.”

www.hrc.org/blog/victory-court-orders-u-s-military-to-immediately-halt-ban-of-transgender-t?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Michelle Visage, Ready Player One, Trump Accusers, Roy Moore, Mario Batali, Will & Grace, Stranger Things: HOT LINKS

Michelle Visage, Ready Player One, Trump Accusers, Roy Moore, Mario Batali, Will & Grace, Stranger Things: HOT LINKS
Francisco Otero Martín

TRUMP ACCUSERS. Women demand Congressional investigation into Trump’s sexual misdeeds: “Samantha Holvey, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks all shared their past experiences with Mr. Trump jointly at Monday’s event, which was held by the organization Brave New Films, a non-profit that creates media and film campaigns surrounding social justice issues.”

NEW YEAR’S EVE. Have you decided yet?

RUSSIA. FBI says Jeff Sessions wasn’t required to disclose foreign contacts while he was a senator: “The FBI email from March bolsters the explanation by the Justice Department for why Sessions didn’t disclose contacts with the Russian ambassador in his application for a US security clearance. When the omission of the foreign contacts on the form was first reported by CNN in May, the Justice Department said Sessions’ office was advised by the FBI that he didn’t need to disclose the meetings.”

NECESSARY CAT VIDEO OF THE DAY. Antonio, who knows where the treat’s at.

MARIO BATALI. The Italian chef has taken a leave from his businesses after being accused of sexual harassment.

ROY MOORE. Pro-Trump group sent a 12-year-old girl to interview the accused child molester: “Millie March went viral at the Conservative Party Action Conference (CPAC) in February, where she offered a full-throttle defense of President Trump’s legislative agenda. Since then, she has become a darling of the right-wing, being interviewed by Fox and Friends in July and meeting Trump himself in September.

KEY WITNESS. Will Steve Bannon face Mueller? “People close to Bannon, who left the White House in August and returned to his former perch as head of Breitbart News, say he’s told them he doesn’t have a lawyer and isn’t worried about potential exposure. But others say it’s inevitable he’ll be called in as a witness in the ongoing investigations. He has not been publicly accused of any wrongdoing or named as a target of the investigations.”

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE WINNERS. Nuclear war is a “tantrum away.” ‘Mankind’s destruction caused by a nuclear war is just one “impulsive tantrum away”, the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), warned on Sunday as the United States and North Korea exchange threats over the nation’s nuclear tests. “Will it be the end of nuclear weapons, or will it be the end of us?” ICAN head Beatrice Fihn said in a speech after receiving the peace prize on behalf of the anti-nuclear group.’

WILL & GRACE. Comcast launches behind-the-scenes companion series on the reboot. “Inside Stage 22 with Max and David, an Xfinity Originals Series, is named after the studio where the sitcom is filmed. Creators Max Mutchnick and David Kohan talk with cast members and also offer insights and background on the series and never-before-seen highlights from the set.”

BINGEWATCHED in 2017. Netflix releases list of its most binge-watched shows.

OkLAHOMAUniversity of Oklahoma Board of Regents member compared gays to pedophiles: “Kirk Humphreys made the comments over the weekend on KFOR-TV’s public affairs show. He also compared gay people to politicians who’ve recently resigned after allegations of sexual misconduct. LGBTQ advocacy group Freedom Oklahoma has called for his removal from the board if he doesn’t apologize. Executive Director Troy Stevenson says Humphreys’ comments were disheartening and dangerous for LGBTQ youth who are already harassed and bullied.”

UGANDA. Police raid shuts down only LGBT film festival. “On Saturday afternoon, the second day of the festival, three policemen, including one armed with an AK-47 rifle, burst into the festival venue in the capital Kampala.”

GOD’S OWN COUNTRY. Gay romance sweeps British Independent Film Awards: “God’s Own Country, the story of a British farmer who falls in love with a Romanian worker, won best feature, best actor for Josh O’Connor and best debut screenwriter for writer and director Francis Lee.”

TRAILER OF THE DAY. Ready Player One.

CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE DAY. This spearfishing WTF.

Instagram Photo

 

BAD LIP READING OF THE DAY. Stranger Things.

CHRISTMAS TUNE OF THE DAY. Michelle Visage “Silent Night”.

MONDAY MUSCLE. Francisco Otero Martín,

Instagram Photo

 

Instagram Photo

 

Instagram Photo

The post Michelle Visage, Ready Player One, Trump Accusers, Roy Moore, Mario Batali, Will & Grace, Stranger Things: HOT LINKS appeared first on Towleroad.


Michelle Visage, Ready Player One, Trump Accusers, Roy Moore, Mario Batali, Will & Grace, Stranger Things: HOT LINKS

“Das sind alles Einzelfälle”: Vertreter der Paket-Branche redet sich bei “Hart aber fair” um Kopf und Kragen

“Das sind alles Einzelfälle”: Vertreter der Paket-Branche redet sich bei “Hart aber fair” um Kopf und Kragen

  • Ein WDR-Journalist hat bei “Hart aber fair” einen Einblick in die miserablen Zustände der Paket-Branche geliefert
  • Der Vorsitzende des Bundesverbandes Paket und Expresslogistik versuchte, die Unternehmen zu verteidigen

Am Montagabend hat “Hart aber fair”-Moderator Frank Plasberg seinen Gästen eine Frage gestellt, die viele Menschen in Deutschland beschäftigen dürfte: “Warum fühlt sich der Wirtschaftsboom für viele Arbeitnehmer wie eine Krise an?”

Zunächst plätscherte die ARD-Sendung dahin – bis WDR-Journalist Dieter Könnes auf die teilweise prekären Arbeitsbedingungen von Paketzustellern aufmerksam machte. Für seine Sendung “Könnes kämpft” hatte der Journalist Missstände in der Branche aufgedeckt.

Eine Zustellerin namens Susanne berichtete in einem Einspieler etwa, dass sie nicht mehr als 6,50 Euro in der Stunde verdiene. Also deutlich unter Mindestlohn. “Dafür müssen Sie aber ein gutes Gebiet haben”, sagte die Zustellerin. Auf dem Land könne der Stundenlohn schon einmal bei drei Euro liegen.

Ein bedrückendes Beispiel für die miserablen Zustände in der Branche. Ein Gast bei “Hart aber fair” wollte das jedoch nicht zählen lassen: Florian Gerster, der Vorsitzende des Bundesverbands der Paket und Expresslogistik.

“Das sind alles Einzelfälle”

“Natürlich darf das nicht sein”, gab der Vorsitzende des Paket-Bundesverbands Gerster zunächst zu. Nur um dann Könnes frontal anzugreifen: “Was aber nicht sein kann, ist, wie reißerisch Sie sich dieses Themas bedienen”, warf Gerster dem WDR-Moderator an den Kopf.

“Das sind Einzelfälle”, sagte Gerster, “dem gehen auch die Unternehmen nach”.

“Es ist klar, dass Sie sagen, das sind Einzelfälle oder schwarze Schafe. Aber ab einer gewissen Größenordnung der Herde von schwarzen Schafen stellt sich doch die Systemfrage”, griff Moderator Plasberg ein.

Gerster sieht die Unternehmen als Opfer

Gerster verwies auf den Preisdruck, der in der Branche herrsche. “Die E-Commerce werben mit freien Versand. Manchmal muss das ein paar Euro kosten”, sagte er. Zudem könnten andere Unternehmen nicht mit dem Preiskampf von DHL, dem größten Anbieter, mithalten.

“Habe ich das richtig verstanden, dass Sie in der Zange klemmen zwischen Amazon und uns allen hier”, versuchte Plasberg aus den Worten von Gerster abzuleiten.

“Die Margen sind zu gering, die Unternehmen können keine vernünftige Kalkulation machen”, verteidigte Gerster seine Branche.

Hier hatte nun die SPD-Politikerin Leni Breymaier genug: “Es wird doch keiner gezwungen, ein Paketunternehmen zu gründen”, schimpfte sie, merklich aufgebracht.

“Wir privatisieren, damit einzelne Leute Geld verdienen, die Chefs von DHL und so weiter”, sagte Breymaier. “Und die Leute verdienen einen Hungerlohn. Die Privatisierung hat sich doch nicht gelohnt.” Sie beklagte auch, dass Pakete zu billig seien.

Sind die Kunden Schuld?

Sind am Ende die Kunden schuld, weil sie nicht bereit sind, mehr Geld für Pakete zu bezahlen? Plasberg befragte sein Publikum – also den anderen Teil der Zange, der die Paketbranche in die Mangel nehme.

Fast jeder im Studio hat kürzlich ein Paket bestellt, wie die Zuschauer per Handzeichen deutlich machten. Aber keiner meinte, mitverantwortlich für den Preisdruck in der Paketbranche zu sein.

“Das ist ja völlig richtig. Wir leben in einer Marktwirtschaft, da werden die Preise verlangt, die vom Markt gebraucht werden”, sagte Gerster.

“Wenn nicht Mindestlohn bezahlt wird, ist das eine Art Notwehr?”, drängte Plasberg den Vorsitzenden.

“Der Mindestlohn ist eine Untergrenze. In Ballungsräumen zahlen wir wesentlich mehr”, gab Gerster zurück.

“Sie reden noch immer über Einzelfälle”

Hier schaltete sich wieder Moderator Könnes ein: “Das kann doch nicht sein, dass Journalisten Fälle aufdecken, wenn das in der Eigenverantwortung der Unternehmen liegt”, wetterte er. “Es müsste eine Behörde geben, die unabhängig ist und das überprüft.”

“Sie reden immer noch über ihre Einzelfälle”, widersprach ihm Gerster.

“Woher wissen Sie das?”, antwortete der Journalist.

“Sie können auch andere Franchise-Unternehmen untersuchen”, versuchte Gerster sich zu verteidigen.

“Das ist nicht meine Frage. Woher wissen Sie, dass das Einzelfälle sind?”, drängte Könnes den Vorsitzenden noch einmal zu einer Antwort.

Die lautete letztlich: “Weil ein Unternehmen nicht dauerhaft so wirtschaften kann.” Spätestens hier drehte sich die Sendung im Kreis. Denn Gerster war zu weiteren Zugeständnissen nicht bereit.

“Ich finde das eine ziemliche Zumutung”

“Ich finde das eine ziemliche Zumutung, was Sie hier sagen”, sagte dann Wirtschaftsethiker Bernhard Emunds zu dem Vorsitzenden des Paket-Bundesverbandes. “Das sind Ihre Unternehmen, die zu solchen günstigen Konditionen Paketdienste anbieten.”

Das würden die Subunternehmer wohl auch nicht ändern, wenn sie mehr Geld verlangen könnten. Denn dann würden sie weiter Menschen prekär beschäftigen – um ihre Gewinne zu steigern.

Der Wirtschaftsethiker nahm daher die Politik in die Pflicht, um Standards wie den Mindestlohn einzuhalten.

An diesem Punkt brachte sich der Wirtschaftswissenschaftler und Direktor des Instituts der deutschen Wirtschaft, Michael Hüther, ein: “Wir haben hier einen Dienstleistungssektor, der sicher nicht dazu dient, Menschen Aufstiegschancen zu geben”.

“Menschen sind in einer Situation, dass sie diese Jobs annehmen müssen”, gab er zu. “Aber die eigentliche Frage, die wir uns stellen müssen, ist: Wie kriegen wir für Menschen mit einer schwierigen Ausgangssituation Aufstiegschancen?”

Hüther bekräftigte: Das sei die eigentliche gesellschaftliche Aufgabe.

➨ Mehr zum Thema: An alle, die ständig über uns Paketboten schimpfen: Das Problem seid ihr selbst

 

(jds)

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/hart-aber-fair_de_5a2f001ce4b078950282f1bd