Merkel spricht im ZDF Klartext: “Finanzministerium zu verlieren, ist akzeptabel”

Merkel spricht im ZDF Klartext: “Finanzministerium zu verlieren, ist akzeptabel”

Angela Merkel im ZDF: Es sei schmerzlich, das Finanzministerium nicht mehr zu haben. “Aber es ist aus meiner Sicht auch akzeptabel” #berlindirekt@ZDFpic.twitter.com/KeiOlAMDpG

— Berlin direkt (@berlindirekt) February 11, 2018

Angela Merkel setzt sich im ZDF gegen parteiinterne Kritik zur Wehr.

Das ist passiert:

► Im mit Spannung erwarteten Interview mit “Berlin Direkt” sagte Merkel, sie wolle vier weitere Jahre Kanzlerin und CDU-Vorsitzende bleiben: “Für mich gehören beide Ämter in eine Hand.”

“Das ist schmerzlich, dass wir das Finanzministerium nicht mehr haben, aber es ist akzeptabel”, erklärte die Kanzlerin zur viel kritisierten Ressortverteilung. 

“Die Alternative wäre gewesen, dass wir den Menschen hätten sagen müssen ‘In der Sache haben wir einen Koalitionsvertrag aber wir haben uns auf die Ressorts nicht einigen können’”, erklärte Merkel. Das sei nicht hinnehmbar.

Darum ist es wichtig:

Zuletzt war von allen Seiten Druck auf die CDU-Chefin ausgeübt worden.

In der Union gibt es große Unzufriedenheit, zum einen wegen der von Merkel nun angesprochenen Ressortverteilung. Zum anderen, weil  viele Klarheit über die Nachfolge Merkels verlangen. Es mehren sich die Stimmen, die neue “junge Gesichter” im Kabinett der GroKo wünschen. 

Merkel erklärte im ZDF: “Wir wollen nicht nur über 60-Jährige berücksichtigen.” Vor dem Parteitag solle jedoch nicht über die Minister entschieden werden.

Angela Merkel will bis zum CDU-Parteitag die Namen der eigenen Minister bekanntgeben: “Nicht nur die Über 60-Jährigen berücksichtigen”, sagt sie @ZDF#berlindirektpic.twitter.com/OjHYnTXUzn

— Berlin direkt (@berlindirekt) February 11, 2018

Was ihr noch wissen müsst:

Das gesamte Interview sendet das ZDF um 19:10 Uhr.

 

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/merkel-im-zdf-finanzministerium-verlieren-ist-akzeptabel_de_5a80749ce4b0c6726e146c05

Labour’s John McDonnell Would Prefer Another Election To Second Brexit Referendum

Labour’s John McDonnell Would Prefer Another Election To Second Brexit Referendum

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell has said he would rather have a general election than a second EU referendum.

McDonnell, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s right-hand man, said another Brexit referendum would cause divisions again and the “better route” is to have a general election.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has previously stopped short of ruling out a second EU referendum when the Brexit terms are known.

Mr Corbyn insisted last month that he was not calling for a new national poll on withdrawal, but sidestepped questions on whether he could change his stance in the future.

Speaking on ITV’s Peston On Sunday, McDonnell said a second Brexit referendum would “divide the country again”, adding: “Those divisions are really still there.”

He said he would worry about opening up the potential of “right-wing xenophobia”, but added: “We’d never turn our back on democratic engagement.”

Asked if Labour will rule out a second Brexit referendum, @johnmcdonnellMP insists he would prefer to fight a general election. #Pestonpic.twitter.com/AjAVGOJ5ID

— Peston on Sunday (@pestononsunday) February 11, 2018

McDonnell told Peston: “Well I think better we have a general election. Better we have a general election. On the issue, and all the other issues, because you then have a wider debate as well.”

Corbyn told Peston last month: “We are not supporting or calling for a second referendum. What we have called for is a meaningful vote in Parliament.”

When it was put to Corbyn that he was not saying he would never support another referendum, the Labour leader said: “We are not calling for one either”.

Asked about a second referendum on any Brexit deal, shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry told BBC1′s Andrew Marr Show last month: “If 90% of the population was now saying we must stay in the European Union and we must not leave then that would be a challenge that would be there for all of us who are democrats.

“But, at the moment, and as things currently stand, we proceed in good faith, we do as we are instructed and we are leaving the European Union.

“We have said that we must respect the result of the referendum which means that we have to leave, but we have to look after the economy which, in my view, means that we don’t go very far.”

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/john-mcdonnell-brexit_uk_5a806e33e4b08dfc93051f5f

Jimmy Kimmel Denies Service to a Gay Person to Skewer Religious Homophobes: WATCH

Jimmy Kimmel Denies Service to a Gay Person to Skewer Religious Homophobes: WATCH
jimmy kimmel gay cake

jimmy kimmel gay cake

This week a judge in Kern County, California ruled for an anti-gay baker who refused to create a custom-made cake for a gay couple’s wedding.

BACKGROUND: California Baker Refuses Service to Gay Couple: ‘Our Business is God’s Business…We Work for Him’ – WATCH

Bakersfield Now reported:

A professing Christian, Cathy Miller says she will sell gay people anything else in her bakery, but will not be made to celebrate a ceremony her faith finds objectionable. Miller and her attorneys equate designing a custom cake with speech and say California compelling speech she doesn’t agree with violates her own constitutional rights.

Jimmy Kimmel this week drew attention to the case with a sketch demonstrating why denying wedding cakes to gay couples is wrong.

In the sketch, Kimmel waits tables at a faux restaurant, and before serving the diners, he asks them several questions — do they have any food allergies, dietary restrictions, or are you gay?

See what happens:

The post Jimmy Kimmel Denies Service to a Gay Person to Skewer Religious Homophobes: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Jimmy Kimmel Denies Service to a Gay Person to Skewer Religious Homophobes: WATCH

Nahles könnte schon am Dienstag SPD-Chefin werden

Nahles könnte schon am Dienstag SPD-Chefin werden
Martin Schulz und Andrea Nahles.

Andrea Nahles könnte Martin Schulz viel früher als SPD-Chef ablösen als geplant.

Das ist passiert:

► Nahles übernimmt schon am Dienstag kommissarisch den Vorsitz über die SPD – das jedenfalls berichtet die “Bild am Sonntag” ohne nähere Quellenangabe.

► Eigentlich wollte Schulz sein Amt erst nach dem Mitglieder-Entscheid der SPD über die GroKo am 2. März abgeben.

►“Es wird am Dienstag eine Präsidiumssitzung geben, auf der wir über den weiteren Weg beraten”, sagte SPD-Generalsekretär Lars Klingbeil der Deutschen Presse-Agentur am Sonntag in Hamburg. Das sei alles, was er dazu sagen könne. 

Darum ist es wichtig:

Nach dem Debakel um Schulz, der nach der Aufgabe des Vorsitzes wegen Widerstands an der Basis auch nicht Außenminister in der geplanten Koalition mit der CDU/CSU werden wird, wächst der Druck, rasch klare Verhältnisse zu schaffen.

Die Furcht ist groß, dass die 463.000 SPD-Mitglieder gegen die GroKo stimmen, wenn sie ihrer Parteispitze nicht mehr vertrauen.

Mehr zum Thema: Deutsche halten die SPD für nicht regierungsfähig

Was ihr noch wissen müsst:

Wenn das Präsidium grünes Licht für einen sofortigen Stabwechsel gibt, müsste Nahles binnen drei Monaten von einem Sonderparteitag gewählt werden.

Dem Präsidium gehören 15 Personen an: die neunköpfige Parteispitze mit Schulz, seinen sechs Stellvertretern, Generalsekretär Klingbeil, Schatzmeister Dietmar Nietan, dem Europabeauftragten Udo Bullmann und Bundesgeschäftsführerin Nancy Böhning. Hinzu kommen sechs Beisitzer.

Mehr zum Thema: “Schlangengrube”: Martin Schulz’ Schwester rechnet mit der SPD-Spitze ab

(lp)

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/nahles-konnte-schon-am-dienstag-spd-chefin-werden_de_5a8051bce4b0c6726e14635a

김여정 등 북한 고위급 대표단이 평양으로 돌아갔다

김여정 등 북한 고위급 대표단이 평양으로 돌아갔다

평창 동계올림픽 개막식 참석 등을 위해 한국을 찾은 김정은 북한 노동당 위원장의 여동생 김여정 노동당 중앙위원회 제1부부장과 김영남 최고인민회의 상임위원회 위원장 등 북한 고위급 대표단이 11일 밤 평양으로 돌아갔다. 

김 부부장 등 북한 고위급 대표단은 이날 저녁 서울 국립중앙극장 해오름극장에서 열린 삼지연 관현악단의 공연 관람을 끝으로 2박3일 동안의 방남 일정을 마치고 인천국제공항으로 출발했다. 

밤 10시 무렵 인천국제공항에 모습을 드러낸 대표단은 9일 낮 한국을 찾을 때 타고 온 김정은 노동당 위원장의 전용기인 ‘참매 1호’를 타고 평양으로 출발했다. 

앞서 이날 삼지연 관현악단 공연은 문재인 대통령과 부인 김정숙 여사가 김정은 노동당 위원장의 특사 자격으로 방남한 김여정 부부장 등 북한 고위급대표단과 함께 관람했다. 

연합뉴스에 따르면 관람에 앞서 김 상임위원장은 ”대통령과 함께 의견을 교환하고 자주 상봉할 수 있는 계기와 기회를 마련했으니 다시 만날 희망을 안고 돌아간다”고 말했다.

그러자 문 대통령은 ”우리가 만난 것이 소중하다”면서 ”이 만남의 불씨를 키워서 횃불이 될 수 있게 남북이 협력하자”고 제안했다.

이 자리에서 김여정 부부장은 김정숙 여사를 향해 ”늘 건강하시라, 문 대통령과 꼭 평양을 찾아오시라”고 말했다.

또 청와대는 이날 오후 서울 중국 반얀트리 클럽 앤 스파 서울에서 임종석 대통령 비서실장의 초청으로 김여정 부부장 등 북한 고위급대표단과 1시간 30분 동안 비공식 환송만찬을 진행했다고도 밝혔다.

이 자리에서 임 실장으로부터 건배사를 제안 받은 김 부부장은 ”제가 원래 말을 잘 못 한다. 솔직히 이렇게 갑자기 오게 되리라 생각 못 했고 생소하고 많이 다를 것이라고 생각했는데 비슷하고 같은 것도 많더라”고 말했다고 알려졌다. 

김 특사는 ”하나 되는 그 날을 앞당겨 평양에서 반가운 분들을 다시 만나기를 바란다”고 건배사를 했다.

www.huffingtonpost.kr/entry/story_kr_5a803b94e4b0c6726e145551

クアッガは、なぜ絶滅したのか? 図鑑から消えた動物の物語

クアッガは、なぜ絶滅したのか? 図鑑から消えた動物の物語

サミュエル・ダニエル「アフリカの風景と動物」(1804~1805年)より

かつては動物図鑑に載っていたのに、絶滅してしまった動物たちがいる。なぜ彼らは地上から消えたのか。第1回となる本稿は、シマウマの一種で、かつて南アフリカにかつて生息していた「クアッガ」についてレポートしよう。

 

■インド航路の中継地に選ばれた南アフリカ

アフリカ大陸の南端部にある喜望峰。この地名は、ポルトガル王のジョアン2世が15世紀に命名した。インドから香辛料を船で輸入するルートの誕生を祈って、Cabo da Boa Esperança(希望の岬)と名付けたのだ。

彼の望みは叶った。1498年にヴァスコ・ダ・ガマが喜望峰を通ってインドに到達したからだ。喜望峰の周辺はヨーロッパ人の補給基地となった。1652年にはオランダ東インド会社のヤン・ファン・リーベックが、ケープ植民地を築いた。

現在の南アフリカ共和国の原型だ。この地はヨーロッパと気候が近く、病原菌を媒介するツェツェバエが生息しないため牧畜生活に適していた。オランダ人を中心に多くの入植者がやってきた。

 

■西洋人が放牧した牛と羊に生息地を奪われる

ロンドン動物園で飼育されていたクアッガ(1875年撮影)

入植したオランダ系の人々(ボーア人)は、奇妙な動物を見た。その特徴的な鳴き声から、先住民のコイコイ人が「クアッカ」と呼ぶ野生のウマだった。

イギリス人の博物学者ウィリアム・バーチェルは、このウマを「ゼブラ」と「クアッガ」の2種類に分類した。ゼブラは現在で言うサバンナシマウマ。全身が白と黒のストライプで覆われていた。一方、クアッガは縞模様があるのは頭から胴体の半分まで。後ろ半分は茶色だった。

クアッガたちはボーア人から「パジャマのズボンをはき忘れたシマウマ」と、ジョークのネタにされた。

30~40頭の群れで草を食むクアッガたちの姿は、ケープ植民地で普通に見られる光景だったが、19世紀のうちに一変した。コイコイ人から略奪した牛と羊をボーア人が植民地内の広大な地域で放牧したことで、クアッガの生息地が奪われたからだ。

クアッガは牧草を食べる邪魔者として狩られ、使用人のコイコイ人たちの食糧となった。その肉は、牛と羊の中間のような味がしたという。

野生の個体は1878年に射殺されたものが最後だ。1883年にはオランダの動物園で飼われていたメスが死んだことで、完全に絶滅した。

 

■クアッガは復活したのか?

クアッガ・プロジェクトで生み出されたクアッガによく似たシマウマ。下半身の縞模様が薄い (Photo credit should read ANNA ZIEMINSKI/AFP/Getty Images)

クアッガは以前、独立種と見られていたが、剥製に残る肉片からDNA解析したところ、サバンナシマウマの亜種と判明した。

もともと全身にあったストライプが、進化の過程で消えたようだ。これを受けて南アフリカでは1987年から「クアッガ・プロジェクト」が始まった。

模様や体色がクアッガに似たサバンナシマウマを集めて交配。世代交代を重ねてクアッガを復活させるのが狙いだ。まだ不完全だが、いずれはクアッガそっくりの固体も誕生するかもしれない。

それは復活したクアッガと言えるのか。それとも、よく似ただけの別物か。どっちなのだろう?

 

■データ

学名:Equus quagga quagga 分類:奇蹄目ウマ科 体長:約250cm 生息域:南アフリカ 絶滅:1883年 画像の出典:[African scenery and animals] – Biodiversity Heritage Library , [Extinct animals] – E. Ray Lankester

■参考文献

William John Burchell “Travels in the interior of southern Africa”(London,1822)
William Cornwallis Harris “Portraits of the Game and Wild Animals of Southern Africa”(London,1840)
John.D.Skinner “The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion”(Cambridge University Press)

レナード・トンプソン「新版 南アフリカの歴史」(明石書店)
ロバート・ロス「南アフリカの歴史 (ケンブリッジ版世界各国史) 」(創土社)
「哺乳類こうして絶滅した5種,そして危ぶまれる20種」(ニュートンプレス)
更科功「化石の分子生物学――生命進化の謎を解く」 (講談社現代新書)

www.huffingtonpost.jp/kenji-ando/quagga_a_23345719/

Time To Put The Spotlight On Pancreatic Cancer Again

Time To Put The Spotlight On Pancreatic Cancer Again

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal cancers in the world. In the UK, only one in 20 people diagnosed live to see another five years and one in 100 people survive beyond ten years. These figures have not changed significantly in 50 years.

Being the poor relation among cancers is something we are used to, but data published in the Lancet last week highlighted that the UK comes 47th out of the 56 countries surveyed for pancreatic cancer five-year survival, with the USA, Canada and Australia having survival rates more than double the UK’s and most EU nations far outperform the UK.

There are several reasons for the low survival rate of pancreatic cancer in the UK and these include a lack of public awareness, no effective screening test and both GPs and members of the public dismissing initial symptoms as something less serious, such as indigestion or irritable bowel syndrome.    

The only potential cure for pancreatic cancer is surgery and, this is only viable when the illness is caught early enough.  

Taking the plunge to put the spotlight on the ‘Cinderella’ cancer

While no early detection test exists, raising awareness of pancreatic cancer is the first step towards early diagnosis and, ultimately, to save lives.   

This is why, in 2014, we took the decision to run with an advertising campaign that promptly put pancreatic cancer into people’s consciousness across the globe. We knew it was going to be hard hitting and we thought long and hard about running it at all.

The campaign depicted Andy, Kerry and Penny, three real sufferers of pancreatic cancer, saying that they wished they had another, more survivable form cancer.  Right from the start, the three of them enthusiastically volunteered to take part. It was very important to us that we had real patients and not actors in the advert to give it reality, but also the integrity such a bold advert would need.

The insight was so accurate that all three patients thought the campaign had come directly from something they had said themselves. It was something that I too had wished for in the early days following my own diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in 2007.

From backlash to the most successful pancreatic cancer awareness campaign ever

With a budget of just £15,000, we launched the adverts in regional papers in Manchester and London, along with a video on YouTube.  The initial launch of the campaign didn’t attract much attention surprisingly.   

It was an ‘outraged’ commuter on the tube who snapped an image of the advert in The Metro on their phone and shared it on social media that sent the campaign global.  The response to the commuter’s tweet was remarkable as it quickly went viral.

While the initial response to the campaign was negative and our team of five (at the time) were overwhelmed with hundreds of phone calls, emails and social media messages from angry members of the public from across the world, it didn’t take long for the tide to turn when people started to read beyond the shocking headline, and when our brave campaigners began to share their stories and feelings.

The backlash itself got the media’s attention.  In one day, I attended 12 national TV and radio interviews, and the following day spoke to local radio across the UK.  Our brave patients also took part in numerous press interviews.  

A post campaign evaluation confirmed that it was extraordinary success – beyond our wildest dreams: 

  • Prompted awareness was 27% for all UK adults  that’s around 12 million people
  • Over £1 million of highest quality earned media from a £15,000 phase 1 spend
  • 43% of people who recognised the campaign were more aware of the symptoms of pancreatic cancer
  • Traffic on explanatory page of Pancreatic Cancer Action website up 963%

While the direct criticisms of the campaign we have received were in their hundreds, millions of people have become more aware of pancreatic cancer.

It is still early days to see the full impact that greater awareness created by the campaign has had on saving lives, however, we know that in the last few years, both the five-year survival and one-year survival rate has begun to increase. From 2010 to 2015, almost 1,000 more people were diagnosed by their GP or via the two-week wait.

Do we regret our decision to launch the campaign?

Any diagnosis of cancer is life-changing, but what’s particularly horrific about pancreatic cancer is its survival rate.  Every year, 10,000 people will be diagnosed and most will be dead within 4-6 months.   

The UK five-year survival of 5% is the worst survival rate of any of the 22 common cancersand compares with 97%, 85%, and 66% survival for testicular, breast and cervical cancers respectively.  

This graph is shocking but does not highlight the real impact of a disease in the way three real sufferers of the disease did.  

At the start of the campaign, both Andy and Kerry had a terminal prognosis and Penny had luckily been down staged to operable. Sadly, the lovely Kerry passed away only two weeks following the launch of the campaign but not before she defended the campaign and reproached the social media trolls on TV, newspaper and radio interviews, even though she was so unwell. Andy passed away the following August and thankfully Penny, the only one of the three, is still very much with us and doing very well.

It was thanks to them that many of the objectors to the campaign did a U-turn and understood what it was we were trying to achieve. Having won two IPA Gold Effectiveness Awards, the I Wish I Had campaign is to date, the most successful pancreatic cancer advertising campaign EVER, and one could argue it is one of the most successful cancer campaigns to date too. It is the campaign that keeps on giving as people still talk about it four years later.

While it was a bold decision, I believe it was right to run the adverts and I am very proud of its success. I am prouder though of the amazing Andy, Kerry and Penny, without whom we couldn’t have achieved what we have done. But, while we know that awareness of pancreatic cancer is increasing and there has been a modest uplift in funding, there is still so very much we need to do to “change the numbers’ for pancreatic cancer and have more people surviving than dying from this horrible disease.

We are still facing an uphill struggle to improve survival rates

While one year and five-year survival rates are starting to increase, and more people are being diagnosed in primary care, pancreatic cancer is still always diagnosed too late for any curative treatment as only one in ten people are diagnosed in time for surgery (the only potential we have for a cure).  

In fact, recent statistics revealed that nearly half of pancreatic cancer patients don’t know they have pancreatic cancer until they end up in Accident & Emergency.  90% of those will be dead within a year.  Your chances of surviving a year are three times greater should you be referred to a specialist from primary care.

To significantly improve survival rates for pancreatic cancer, we need:

To Improve awareness of pancreatic cancer symptoms

Data for 2015 has shown that the number of people newly diagnosed with pancreatic cancer is just under 10,000 per annum; an increase of 17% compared to 2010 and, in the same period, mortality has increased by 13%.

The rate of incidence growth has surpassed predictions made by Globocan. There are some regional variations in these numbers and overall, and possibly not surprisingly, these increases tend to be highest in areas with greatest ageing population and those that are more deprived.

We urgently need pancreatic cancer to be included in a Department of Health cancer awareness campaign and for more GPs to be aware of early symptoms of the disease.

To Campaign for the government to increase funding

What is also a factor, and why we need to put pancreatic cancer on the map, is the decades of chronic underfunding of the disease. Research spend in comparison to other cancers is pitiful. In 2015, pancreatic cancer received £8 million – and in case you think that is a lot, it makes up only 3% of overall cancer research spending.

While acknowledging there has been an increase in funding over the past two years, it is not nearly enough to make up for the decades of neglect and enormous investment still needs to be made if we are to ‘change the numbers’ for pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer charities are too small to heavily invest in research funding (although we do what we can) so we need help from government to reduce the inequalities of funding between cancer types

A pancreatic cancer audit is needed

There is variation in incidence and survival rates across the UK.  We need an audit to understand where best practice is happening so we can emulate this across the UK improving standards and outcomes for patients.

While Scotland and Northern Ireland have had an audit, there has never been one carried out in England where 83% of pancreatic cancer patients in the UK reside.  

While we continue to campaign for the government to support us, we will also continue to fund research into early diagnosis, launch awareness campaigns and provide accredited e-learning to medical professionals.  

Quite simply, as long as we are here, and continued to be supported, we will do everything we can to get closer to the day when more people survive pancreatic cancer than die from it.  

You can find out more about how you can support us by visiting www.panact.org.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/time-to-put-the-spotlight-on-pancreatic-cancer-again_uk_5a801371e4b0c6726e144030