The Waugh Zone Wednesday December 20, 2017

The Waugh Zone Wednesday December 20, 2017

1. BRITANNIA RULES

It’s the final PMQs of the year and the only area where “nothing has changed” is that Theresa May is still Prime Minister and Jeremy Corbyn is still Leader of the Opposition. As they square up across the despatch box, May will want to trumpet her Brexit breakthrough. Corbyn may go off-piste and avoid Europe, preferring to highlight homelessness stats again, or Universal Credit, or even an IMF growth downgrade (Mark Carney and the IMF have a press conference this morning). The Labour leader probably won’t be tempted to cite an Iranian ayatollah who yesterday called Boris Johnson a ‘liar’, ‘womaniser’ and ‘a clown’.

May has a packed agenda, as she follows PMQs with a session before the Liaison Committee at 3.15pm, when all the select committee chairs will ask her about the following: Brexit and the transition; health and social care funding; her ‘burning injustices’ agenda; and sex harassment in the workplace (speaking of which, time is running out for the Damian Green inquiry to be published before the Commons rises for recess tomorrow). Blair used to fend off every question at Liaison Committee with aplomb, as MPs were notoriously bad at asking them. Brown stonewalled, Cameron arrived with gimmicky announcements in his back pocket. Will May yield any real insights today? Aides sound like they just want to get through it unscathed.

Over in Brussels, the EU publishes its draft negotiating guidelines. Michel Barnier’s “killer graphic” ridiculing May’s ‘red lines’ on Brexit emerged yesterday. But the backlash against Barnier is in full swing, with the Sun claiming the UK is winning round individual EU states and that even Jean-Claude Juncker was unhappy with him for ruling out a decent Brexit deal for the City of London.  The BBC reports the UK is offering EU banks easy access even under a ‘no deal’ Brexit. Is that a measure of the City’s desperation? Or a cleverly calculated olive branch?

A timely concession means May will avoid further defeat on the Exit Date for Brexit as the final day of Committee stage on the EU Withdrawal Bill takes place. (Watch out for a possible Labour rebellion on Chris Leslie’s amendment on staying in the customs union though). Yesterday’s lengthy but ‘lively’ Cabinet meeting on Brexit was most notable for Michael Gove warning colleagues against a re-run of ‘Project Fear’ doom and gloom on life outside EU rules. The Guardian reports he directed a pointed comment at Philip Hammond, who was in turn defended by Amber Rudd. Ex-Remainers insisted the UK should stick as close as possible to EU trade rules, but Brexiteers think Britannia should have its own rules. Come October, we will find out who’s really bluffing, in London and Brussels.

Still, I wonder what the PM thought of Sir John Sawers, former head of MI6, telling the Foreign Affairs Committee yesterday: “We have to acknowledge that Brexit is damaging our economy. We do not want to go through a repeat of the 1970s where the UK went progressively downhill. We will need to turn it around. I am not sure how we are going to do it”.  Maybe Sawers should attend the Tories’ Bow Group event tonight, where John Redwood will deliver his “annual Christmas fairytale”…

 

2. TAXING TIMES

Way back in the mid-1990s, I used to turn up to the old Department for the Environment building in London (its towers were dubbed ‘the three ugly sisters of Marsham Street’) for briefings on the annual local government finance settlement. That grey building has long been demolished, but yesterday Communities Secretary Sajid Javid revived a story we all used to write under John Major: millions facing council tax hikes.

Yes, families could see bills rise by up to £100 a year (the biggest rise in 14 years) after Javid said town halls could jack up taxes by 5.99% without any local referendums. The figures are provisional of course, but it looks like this is one area the Government is following orthodoxy and hiking bills after a general election rather than before one. Tory MP Bob Blackman tells Mail Online: “It is not a happy Christmas message to see for hard-pressed council tax payers.” Jacob Rees-Mogg warned against “a return to the Blair/Brown era of stealth taxes”. Tory LGA chief Lord Porter is even more scathing, warning we are now at “a financial breaking point which will threaten the existence of some local services”

Meanwhile, there’s more bad news for local taxpayers in the police funding settlement smuggled out yesterday. Forces will get extra money, but only if police and crime commissioners jack up their council tax ‘precept’. Shadow Police Minister Louise Haigh tells HuffPost that a swift Commons Library analysis has revealed the amount of money provided by the Home Office to local forces will fall by at least £100m in real terms next year. A further 1.3% cut on the 2017/18 settlement, that takes the total cut in central government funding since 2015 to £513m. Don’t forget ministers said they would ‘protect’ police funding.

 

3. TRUMP CARD

Theresa May finally chatted on the phone to Donald Trump last night. It was the first time they had spoken since their public spat over the President’s retweets of far-right group Britain First’s propaganda videos. It’s not quite clear if Trump had been refusing to take her calls or she was refusing his (or they’d just been both very busy). But her failure to raise the tweets has been pounced on by Jeremy Corbyn, whose spokesman says she should have decided to ‘stand up against hate’.  

Trump and May wished each other a Merry Christmas, but there was a hint of disagreement on Israel. “They discussed the different positions we took on the recognition of Jerusalem as the Israeli capital,” the official No.10 read-out said, which was diplo-speak for May repeating the UK official policy. May had declared 13 days ago she would challenge the President personally on the Jerusalem issue, and the delay suggests her anger, if she had any, was not exactly red hot yesterday.

Over in the States, however, Trump has secured his first big policy victory in Congress this morning with the Senate passing his ‘Tax Cuts And Jobs Act’ (Americans, they love an arresting title on their legislation).  The tax cuts are the most radical overhaul of the US tax system in 30 years, with big business and the wealthy benefitting most. That’s a bit awkward for Trump’s campaign trail promise to be on the side of ‘the little guy’, let alone the trillion dollars added to national debt. A bit like May, his inner circle will claim he’s got to Christmas by defying the doubters, with a major tax cut victory and an immigration ban that critics said would never happen. But as with May, there will be trouble ahead. My HuffPost UK colleagues report the tax cut bill is the least popular item of Presidential legislation since the 1990s.

 

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR…

Watch panicked American student Ann Mark explain how she turned up to her first final exam, without the right notebook, in the wrong building.  Her tweeted video has gone viral, with 8 million views so far.

 

4. ROUGH, ENOUGH

Historically, the Public Accounts Committee used to deal only in dry topics like misspending and procurement errors. But today it brings its analytical heft to expose the growing scandal of the number of homeless people on Britain’s streets. Its new report found that 9,100 people are sleeping rough every night, with a further 78,000 families in temporary accommodation.

Since March 2011, the number of people who sleep rough has risen by 134%. The average rough sleeper dies before the age of 50, and children in long-term temporary accommodation miss far more schooling than their peers. PAC chair Meg Hillier wants targeted help for councils, rather than ministers passing the buck to town halls. Labour and the Lib Dems say benefit cuts are also to blame. As we approach Christmas, it’s not just Grenfell that has exposed Britain’s housing crisis.

 

5. PLASTIC PROMISES

A coalition of animal welfare and environmental charities has warned that more than 100,000 tonnes of plastic packaging will be thrown away and not recycled this Christmas. Michael Gove, who was famously ‘haunted’ by Blue Planet II’s footage of turtles caught in plastic bags, yesterday unveiled plans for a bottle deposit scheme and other moves to end single-use plastics, such as straws and coffee cups.

Unfortunately, Gove has a talent for embarrassing incidents while walking to and from Cabinet (who could forget this slip?). And yesterday, he suffered another political pratfall (or should that be Pretfall?) as the Sun reports he was photographed in Downing Street carrying a non-recyclable Pret A Manger coffee cup. Oops.

 
 
 

If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get The Waugh Zone delivered to your inbox.

Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul WaughNed SimonsKate Forrester Rachel Wearmouth and Owen Bennett.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/the-waugh-zone-wednesday-december-20-2017_uk_5a3a1ab6e4b06d1621b06aa6

Familiennachzug: Junge Unions-Abgeordnete würden zusammen mit der AfD stimmen

Familiennachzug: Junge Unions-Abgeordnete würden zusammen mit der AfD stimmen
Würden wohl zusammen mit der Kanzlerin gegen den Familiennachzug stimmen: die AfD-Fraktion im Bundestag.

  • Die Junge Gruppe der Unionsfraktion würde auch die Stimmen der AfD in Kauf nehmen, um den Familiennachzug für Flüchtlinge weiter auszusetzen
  • Sollte die SPD dagegen stimmen, wären CDU, CSU und FDP auf die Stimmen der AfD angewiesen

Die Junge Gruppe der Bundestagsfraktion der CDU und CSU würde auch zusammen mit der AfD abstimmen, wenn es um den Familiennachzug geht. 

Der Familiennachzug für subsidiär Geschützte ist seit März 2016 ausgesetzt, im Januar muss der Bundestag erneut darüber abstimmen, ob das so bleiben soll.

Der CDU-Bundestagsabgeordnete Marian Wendt, der für den Vorsitz der Gruppe kandidiert, sprach sich gegenüber dem RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland (RND) für die weitere Aussetzung des Familiennachzugs aus – und nimmt dafür auch die Stimmen der AfD-Fraktion in Kauf.

“Wir werden uns nicht dagegen wehren”

“Wie bei den laufenden Bundeswehrmandaten erwarten wir von der SPD im Sinn eines sondierungsfreundlichen Verhaltens, noch im Januar zumindest einen Erhalt des Status quo beim Familiennachzug für drei oder sechs Monate zuzustimmen, bis es eine entsprechende Vereinbarung in einem Koalitionsvertrag gibt”, sagte Wendt dem RND.

Sollte die SPD dazu allerdings nicht bereit sein, “werden wir die Verlängerung für den ausgesetzten Familiennachzug trotzdem zur Abstimmung stellen”, bekräftigte er.

Das Problem dabei: Sollte sich die SPD gegen eine weitere Aussetzung des Familiennachzugs sperren, wären die Union und die FDP auf die Stimmen der AfD angewiesen, um das Vorhaben durchzusetzen. Grüne und Linke sind gegen die Aussetzung.

“Wir kalkulieren dabei nicht die Zustimmung der AfD ein, aber wir werden uns auch nicht dagegen wehren”, sagte Wendt dem RND.

Mehr zum Thema: An diesen 3 Konflikten droht die SPD zu Beginn der Sondierungen zu zerbrechen

Das Dilemma der Union

Für die Union wird die Abstimmung über den Familiennachzug wohl zum Dilemma, sollte die SPD nicht mitmachen.

CSU-Generalsekretär Andreas Scheuer hatte kürzlich bereits der Tageszeitung “Welt” gesagt, man werde nicht verhindern können, dass sich die AfD Anträgen der Union anschließe. Er betonte: Es werde keine Absprachen geben.

Ein AfD-Abgeordnete sagte der HuffPost: “Es wird der Moment kommen, wo sie uns brauchen.”

Mehr zum Thema: Erste Plenarsitzungen zeigen: Die AfD stellt die Parteien vor ein Problem, mit dem die wenigsten gerechnet hatten

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/familiennachzug-junge-unions-abgeordnete-wurden-indirekt-zusammen-mit-der-afd-abstimmen_de_5a39f597e4b06d1621b060d1

I Fled The Syrian War And Now Work In A Refugee Camp Helping Children In Need

I Fled The Syrian War And Now Work In A Refugee Camp Helping Children In Need

My name is Abed Elmajeed Elnaimi, I am 32-years-old, I am Jordanian and I was born in Syria.

Syria is a beautiful country, living there gave me amazing childhood memories. I finished college with a tour guidance major, and I have visited most of the historical attractions in Syria, it was an unforgettable stage of my life. Life in Syria was simple, everything was cheap and available, medicine, public transportation, education.

The war started in 2011, the first thing I experienced in Damascus was the increasing security forces presence everywhere, wherever I would go the security checkpoints were in front of me. Food items prices started to increase many folds in a very short time and lots of people couldn’t afford it.

I can still remember the very first scary situation. I was asleep at home where all of a sudden, I woke up at the noise of a ridiculously loud explosion, and then I learned that it was a suicidal car bomb attack. Up to this point people still had hope that violence will subside soon, but it was not meant to be.

I lived in Syria for one year during the war, in which time I experienced a couple of close-to-death experiences. One of them was when I was going back home after work and I had to cross a military checkpoint to reach home, and then after five minutes the same checkpoint was bombed and a crossing bus was destroyed, killing everyone in it.

The second incident was when I was working in an area where all of a sudden the shooting started between the government forces and the free Syrian army. I was stuck in a building for around five hours and it was located in the crossfire line between the two fighting forces, I was really scared. Eventually the shooting stopped, and on the way back home I saw the level of destruction in the area, there were many furniture shops and all of them were on fire, but the worst scene that is still stuck in my memory was the fear I saw in the people’s faces. I saw many families leaving the area and the women and children were terrified and crying. That was when I made my decision, I couldn’t stay in Syria anymore. It was a heart-breaking decision, but I had to do it. 

When I came to Jordan I had a problem that I shared with many Syrian people, I came with a very limited amount of money that was depleted in a short time and finding a job was difficult. The house rents were very expensive, and when I had spent all my money I almost made the decision to return to Syria like many Syrian families did, but then I had a job offer. It was in Za’atari camp.

When I got the job offer I went for it straight away. Working with the Syrian people is more than what I hoped for, coming from Syria I had a strong connection with the Syrian people and I had the desire to help them. I started working with a Jordanian NGO, at that time I used to work sometimes 24 hours a day in the camp because it was a state of emergency and people were coming by their thousands every day. I used to welcome the new arrivals and help distribute food and blankets for them upon their arrival. I continued witnessing the pain of the Syrian people by working in the camp but I was really happy knowing that I was doing something to help the Syrian people.

It’s been six years since I started working with humanitarian aid organisations and now I work with Unicef. My job is in communications, and mostly what I do is to help spread the news about the challenges the Syrian children are facing, hoping that the world would send more assistance for Syrian children.

One of the benefits of working with children is that every now and then I can directly help some of them. One of the children that I helped, her story will remain carved in my memory.

I met her couple of years ago she was struggling with English in school, she wasn’t able to memorise many words so I taught her couple of tricks on how to remember English words and she seemed very interested. After one year I came across the same girl, she told me how good she became in English and we were able to make a simple conversation in English. That moment knowing that – in a way – I was able to improve someone’s future was one of my proudest moments.   

Many families had to make the difficult choice to leave Syria, many of them crossed to Europe on a perilous route that can end up killing them, that is not easy, I know… My stepsister is one of them, she couldn’t come to be with us in Jordan but she left Syria to Europe. She sold everything she owns and worked so hard to get, including her house, to cover the cost of the trip, which is mostly paid to the smugglers, and she lost most of her bags and shoes crossing to Europe. She crossed on an unsafe inflatable raft but fortunately she ended up in the Netherlands and all I want to say is thank you to all the countries that welcomed the Syrian people, and without their help these people would have nowhere to go.

The Syrian people are still suffering the ongoing war in their country. Many of them, including children, lost their lives to the war, many others lost their futures, and many children’s lives have been altered to the point of no return. Children have lost their parents, and have lost their chance to education, girls were forcibly married due to economic situation of their parents. Children are growing up as refugees away from their home country and many of them have never seen Syria after seven years of war.

What I really wish for is that the Syrian people would have a chance to live in peace once again. I believe that peace is the most important thing in life, without peace there is no life, and there is no future.

For me I wish I can one day be reunited with my loved ones, my sister, my friends…         

HuffPost UK has teamed up with Unicef to raise money for Syrian children affected by a war which has stretched over almost seven years. 

To donate to the HuffPost UK Christmas Appeal go to: unicef.uk/huffpost

Life Less Ordinary is a weekly blog series from HuffPost UK that showcases weird and wonderful life experiences. If you’ve got something extraordinary to share please email [email protected] with LLO in the subject line. To read more from the series, visit our dedicated page. 

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/refugee-worker-unicef_uk_5a38e99be4b0fc99878e7d54

Progress

Progress

alexhays634 posted a photo:

Progress

This piece which uses the American mask is titled “Progress.” It depicts two female figures wearing an American mask and a rainbow mask standing in front of a mural that says in different colors “LOVE.” The idea behind the piece is the struggles and political warfare that many had to go through to get rights to love someone. It represents how America has slowly accepted gay people into the culture and made it something that is to put it simply, natural. Ever since I was younger I was always confused by the idea of love being illegal. This piece represents those thoughts that I had as a kid.

Progress