Seine Tochter brachte sich um – jetzt lud er die Peiniger ein

Seine Tochter brachte sich um – jetzt lud er die Peiniger ein
Für die Familie Everett zählt es nur noch, andere Familien vor diesen schlimmen Erfahrungen zu bewahren.

  • Ein 14-jähriges Mädchen hat sich in Australien das Leben genommen, sie wurde im Internet gemobbt
  • Ihr Vater und die Familie setzen sich nun stark gegen Mobbing ein

Der Tod eines 14-jährigen Mädchens hat tausende Menschen in Australien bestürzt.

Amy “Dolly” Everett war mit acht Jahren das Gesicht der Marke “Akubra”, einem bekannten Hersteller für australische Outback-Hüte. Am dritten Januar nahm sie sich das Leben. Der Grund dafür: Dolly wurde im Internet stark gemobbt.

In einem Facebook-Post teilte der Vater der 14-Jährigen nun seine Trauer mit der Welt.

“Das ist ein Beispiel, wie Social-Media funktionieren sollte”

In seinem Post bedankt er sich für die Unterstützung und Anteilnahme, die seine Familie in der schweren Zeit erhält.

Die habe er auch viel über Soziale Medien bekommen. “Diese Woche war ein Beispiel dafür, wie Social-Media funktionieren sollte aber auch, ein Beispiel wie es nicht laufen sollte”, schrieb Tick Everett und spielte damit auf die schlimmen Erfahrungen, die seine Tochter gemacht hat, an.

Auch der Huthersteller “Akubra”, dessen Gesicht Dolly war, macht sich gegen Mobbing stark 

Sein Facebook-Post richtet sich aber nicht nur an Freunde und Unterstützer – Dollys Peiniger werden auch angesprochen.

Mehr zum Thema: Meine Tochter nahm sich mit 16 Jahren das Leben: Jeder soll wissen, wie das passieren konnte

Eine Einladung zur Beerdigung für die Mobber

“Falls das hier zufälligerweise ein paar Leute lesen sollten, die dachten es wäre lustig und die sich überlegen fühlten, weil sie konstant mobben und belästigen: Bitte kommt zur Beerdigung und seht, was ihr für eine schreckliche Verwüstung angerichtet habt”, richtet sich der Vater an die Mobber.

Doch die Einladung ist nicht das einzige Angebot an die Täter: “Wir müssen anfangen, darüber zu sprechen. Wir müssen die kleinen Kinder aufklären, wir müssen Lehrer aufklären.”

Mobbing müsse so früh wie möglich aufgehalten werden, egal in welchen Alter die Kinder sind, sagt Everett gegenüber der australischen Nachrichtenseite “News”.

Die Familie Everett beschäftigt sich inzwischen nicht mehr mit denjenigen, die an dem Tod ihrer Tochter schuld sein könnten – für sie zählt nur noch, andere Familien vor diesen schlimmen Erfahrungen zu bewahren.

➨ Mehr zum Thema: Studie offenbart alarmierende Zahl von Mobbingopfern an Schulen – das können Eltern tun

Auch die Politik lässt dieser Fall nicht kalt

Auch der australische Premierminister Malcom Turnbull äußerte sich am vergangenen Donnerstag in einem Statement: “Dolly, wir lieben dich und werden dich nie vergessen.[…] Wir müssen alles tun, um die Mobbingfälle zu reduzieren, egal, ob offline oder online, und sie bekämpfen, wo immer wir können.“

 

Erst kürzlich veröffentlichten australische Behörden eine Studie, die die stetig ansteigenden Zahlen von Mobbing-Opfern aufzeigt. Etwa jedes fünfte Kind sei mittlerweile Ziel geworden, heißt es dort.

Offizielle Zahlen zu Todesfällen in Australien, die durch Mobbing ausgelöst wurden, gibt es allerdings nicht.

(ks)

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/seine-tochter-brachte-sich-um-jetzt-lad-er-die-peiniger-zu-sich-ein_de_5a58945be4b02cebbfdad72e

My BBC Unequal Pay Story

My BBC Unequal Pay Story

Many years ago I went to see my male boss to ask for a pay rise. I had discovered that a man doing the same job as me was paid over a third more. I thought I had a good case.

This was at the BBC in the 1990s. I was a UK-based correspondent reporting on education for radio. My male counterpart covered the same subject for TV. Our background experience was comparable and arguably radio demanded a more prolific and varied output. Moreover, a recent move to bi-medial coverage meant that we were doing regular swaps, with me reporting for TV news while he did the early morning punditry on the Today programme and other radio work.

Up to then, I had been quite happy with what I earned. I wasn’t complaining about my colleague. He was a terrific reporter and if he had persuaded them to pay him so much, good for him. But I reckoned I was terrific too and fair’s fair. Something wasn’t right.

It’s true to say my meeting with the then Head of Newsgathering was not an unqualified success. My complaint of unfairness was met with disdain. No proper explanation was offered and I was made to feel that this was not a suitable matter for discussion. My cautious suggestion that sex discrimination was at play was pooh-poohed (unsurprisingly – equal pay legislation had been around for a couple of decades). I was offered a derisory increase – so derisory as to make very little difference to the arithmetic of the pay differential.

All of this was well before the more recent, if enforced, moves to transparency at the BBC. Salaries were then generally secret above a certain level and disclosure among colleagues was not common. That my TV counterpart and I knew each other’s pay was unusual.

But Carrie Gracie’s bold resignation as the BBC’s China Editor in protest at unequal pay and her claim of unlawful discrimination by the BBC brought it back to me. Politicians have entered the fray, the Equality and Human Rights Commission is asking questions and once again the BBC seems on the back foot, despite its revealing a few months ago a gender pay gap smaller than the UK average. As it pointed out, the gender pay gap is not the same as equal pay and arises in large measure because there are more men in senior positions.

But what we are talking about here is equality – equal pay for work of equal value. Public interest is stirred because of the names involved and the size of their pay packets and because those pay packets come from public funds. But where the BBC goes, no doubt most others go too, and, for all we know, more extremely so. Other broadcasters? Industry? The city?

In a free market for talent, pay differences are always going to be difficult. But if there is any hint of a systemic gender bias, then there is a problem. It is probably not a conscious bias (‘oh, he’s a man, that’ll be 40% extra then’) and other factors must be at play. There may even be a subconscious throwback to the ancient notion that men work because they have to and women work for pin money. No employers are going to have pay more than they need to and men may simply negotiate harder and better. I hate to generalise but there may be a glimmer of truth here.

All those years ago, I certainly could have done with advice on negotiating pay. I should have done more research and presented my case more convincingly. I could have been smarter and blown my trumpet more loudly.

But of course it shouldn’t be left to the negotiating skills of individual women and women shouldn’t be left to fight a rearguard action on discovering they’re shafted. The BBC has already promised to be a beacon of fairness by 2020. It may now be under pressure to act more quickly.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/my-bbc-unequal-pay-story_uk_5a57a6b8e4b0f5da6183589a

HRC Announces Special Guests at Time to THRIVE Conference on LGBTQ Youth Safety and Inclusion

HRC Announces Special Guests at Time to THRIVE Conference on LGBTQ Youth Safety and Inclusion

Today, HRC announced LGBTQ advocates and allies who will be special guests and speakers at the organization’s annual Time to THRIVE Conference on February 16-18 at the Hilton Orlando Bonnet Creek in Orlando. They include trans athlete Chris Mosier; Native American dancers Adrian Stevens and Sean Snyder; advocates Judy and Dennis Shepard of the Matthew Shepard Foundation; and performer Johnny Manuel. They will join Gavin Grimm, the transgender trailblazer who is being honored at the conference with HRC’s Upstander Award.

The conference is co-presented by the National Education Association and the American Counseling Association. Toyota, BBVA Compass and AT&T are presenting sponsors of the event.

“Spanning arenas and cultural backgrounds across the U.S. and beyond, these special Time to THRIVE guests are doing the vital work to ensure that LGBTQ young people are able to live, learn and thrive in environments that respect every aspect of their identity,” said Vincent Pompei, Director of HRC’s Youth Well-Being Project and Time to THRIVE Conference chair. “At a time when too many people have been emboldened to bully marginalized and vulnerable people, it’s never been more important to have professionals fighting for the equal treatment of LGBTQ youth in schools and their communities.”

  • Chris Mosier is the first openly transgender athlete to qualify for a U.S. national team, earning a spot on the Team USA sprint duathlon men’s squad for the 2016 World Championships. He founded Transathlete.org and is the vice president of You Can Play, which works to ensure the safety and inclusion of all in sports – including LGBTQ athletes, coaches and fans.
  • Native American couple Adrian Stevens and Sean Snyder are working to bring visibility and equality to all LGBTQ Native Americans through dance. Their powerful story was recently featured in People.
  • Judy and Dennis Shepard founded the Matthew Shepard Foundation to honor their gay son after he died from injuries sustained in a hate crime, and fought for passage of The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA). Judy is also a longtime member of HRC Foundation Board of Directors.
  • Johnny Manuel, a semifinalist on America’s Got Talent, is slated to perform during the conference.

HRC previously announced that it will honor transgender advocate Gavin Grimm with an Upstander Award during the Time to THRIVE Conference. Grimm made history after suing his school district over its discriminatory policy that barred him from using the boy’s restroom, alleging that the district violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. HRC’s Parents for Transgender Equality Council, HRC’s Youth Ambassadors and HRC’s Welcoming Schools Program will also be featured at the conference.

The event brings together a wide range of youth-serving professionals to discuss best practices for working with and caring for LGBTQ youth and their families in schools, community centers, health care settings and beyond. To register, visit www.TimeToThrive.org.

www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-announces-special-guests-at-time-to-thrive-conference-on-lgbtq-youth-sa?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Was moderne Eltern machen, hat unser ganzes Land verändert

Was moderne Eltern machen, hat unser ganzes Land verändert
Ein ganzes Land hat sich verändert, weil Eltern ihre Kinder heute anders erziehen.

  • Zwischen 2007 und 2015 haben Gewalttaten von 14- bis 18-Jährigen um die Hälfte abgenommen
  • Für diesen Trend sind gewaltfreie Erziehung und ein Rückgang der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit verantwortlich

Meine Tochter hängt an meinem Bein. Sie schreit. Sie kratzt. Sie beschimpft mich. Gerade habe ich ihr gesagt, dass sie mir mein Handy zurückgeben soll.

Dass ich nicht will, dass sie noch länger die Sendung mit der Maus anschaut. Ich versuche ruhig und liebevoll zu bleiben. Auf sie einzugehen.

Nicht selbst laut und aggressiv zu werden. Die Kontrolle über die Situation zu behalten. Das ist nicht leicht.

In solchen Momenten sagt mein Mann oft: “Wir machen alles falsch.”

Mehr zum Thema: Forschung zeigt: Das machen Eltern erfolgreicher Kinder anders

Und manchmal zweifle ich auch daran, ob wir wirklich alles richtig machen in der Erziehung unserer Tochter – oder ob wir härter durchgreifen müssten. Wie unsere Eltern und Großeltern.

Heute habe ich endlich die Gewissheit: Wir erziehen unser Kind genau richtig.

Denn eine Langzeitstudie des Kriminologischen Forschungsinstituts Niedersachsen von Christian Pfeiffer, Dirk Baier und Sören Kliem zeigt, dass die moderne, gewaltfreie Erziehung im letzten Jahrzehnt zu einem starken Rückgang von Jugendgewalt in Deutschland geführt hat.

Ein ganzes Land hat sich also verändert, weil Eltern ihre Kinder heute anders erziehen.

Zwischen 2007 und 2015 haben Gewalttaten von 14- bis 18-Jährigen um die Hälfte abgenommen. Die Zahl schwerer innerschulischer Gewaltvorfälle ist gesunken.

Moderne, gewaltfreie Erziehung

Im Jahr 1999 wurden pro 1.000 Schülerinnen und Schüler noch 14,9 Raufunfälle registriert, 2015 nur noch 8,7, heißt es in der Studie.

Und auch Körperverletzungen und Raubtaten haben sich reduziert. 1998 gaben noch 18,4 Prozent der Jugendlichen an, mindestens eine Körperverletzung ausgeführt zu haben. 2015 waren es nur noch 4,9 Prozent.

Für diesen Trend ist die moderne, gewaltfreie Erziehung verantwortlich.

Die Studie zeigt nämlich: Jugendliche wachsen immer häufiger gewaltfrei in ihren Familien auf.

Der Anteil an Jugendlichen, die in der Kindheit keine Gewalt von Seiten der Eltern erlebt haben, ist von 43,3 auf 60,8 Prozent gestiegen. Diese Kinder sind später auch selbst weniger gewalttätig.

“Gewalt ist ein erlerntes Verhaltensmuster”, erklärt Alexandra Winzinger, Kinder- und Jugendpsychotherapeutin. “Wir orientieren uns daran, was wir kennen, nicht an dem, was wir nie kennengelernt haben.”

Mehr zum Thema: Psychische Gewalt: Wenn Worte Leben zerstören

Es sei also der normale Lauf der Dinge, dass Kinder, die Gewalt erfahren, auch später eher gewalttätig werden und umgekehrt, sagt Winzinger.

“Wenn Kinder Liebe erfahren, Werte mit auf den Weg bekommen, sich unter Begleitung der Eltern ausprobieren dürfen, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit später kriminell zu werden viel geringer”, erklärt die Psychotherapeutin.

Laut der Studie bekommen die Kinder heute von ihren Eltern weit mehr emotionale Zuwendung als noch vor 20 Jahren.

Das ist eine sehr positive Entwicklung, die auch zum Rückgang von Jugendgewalt beiträgt.

Für die Studienleiter steht fest: Die moderne Erziehung ist eine Ursache für den Rückgang von Jugendkriminalität. Die andere ist der Rückgang der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit in Deutschland innerhalb der vergangenen zehn Jahre.

Ein Erziehungsstil sei besonders positiv, um Kinder davon abzuhalten, zu gewalttätigen Jugendlichen zu werden, erklärt Dirk Baier, einer der Studienleiter, der auch das Institut für Delinquenz und Kriminalprävention in Zürich leitet. Das ist der sogenannte autoritative Erziehungsstil.

Respektvoll, aber die Zügel trotzdem in der Hand

Diese Erziehung bestimmt sich dadurch, dass die Eltern auf die Bedürfnisse der Kinder und auf ihre Gefühle eingehen, aber dabei die Kontrolle behalten, Interesse daran haben, was ihre Kinder machen, mit wem sie sich treffen”, erklärt Baier.

Eltern sollen dem Kind also auf Augenhöhe begegnen, sie respektvoll und liebevoll behandeln, aber trotzdem die Zügel in der Hand behalten.

Das ist nicht immer einfach, wie ich aus eigener Erfahrung weiß. Auch Baier erzählt am Ende des Gesprächs, dass er selbst junger Vater ist und nun weiß, dass Erziehung keine leichte Sache sei.

Ich bin beruhigt. Wahrscheinlich zweifeln viele junge Eltern das ein oder andere Mal an sich. Aber seit heute weiß ich, dass wir das gar nicht so schlecht machen. Und ruhig ein bisschen stolz sein dürfen.

Wenn meine Tochter das nächste Mal an meinem Bein hängt, schreit, schimpft und kratzt, werde ich nicht mehr zweifeln.

Denn jetzt weiß ich: Ich mache das schon richtig.

www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/moderne-erziehung-gewalt_de_5a576b00e4b03bc4d03e8e03

Pre-Prepared Vegetables Are A Necessity For Those Of Us With Disabilities – Excess Packaging Is Not

Pre-Prepared Vegetables Are A Necessity For Those Of Us With Disabilities – Excess Packaging Is Not

I remember the day clearly, when in my early 30’s, I picked up my veg knife and went to chop up a carrot… and I physically couldn’t. It was as if the carrot was made of concrete, I couldn’t understand it.  Such a simple task yet I could not complete it.  I’d spent the majority of my 20’s in my kitchen with my friends, on my feet for 12 hours or more, music blaring, with a bottle of wine, cooking up a storm for a dinner party for 10 or more guests. Usually, by the time the guests arrived I’d be too exhausted to actually eat anything myself but I could cook and all that goes with it. That was until I reached my 30’s, then disability really took its toll and slowly but surely, more everyday ‘simple’ activities became unachievable goals.  I still knew how to cook. It obviously wasn’t ignorance or lack of education; I hadn’t forgotten. I tried everything. Like most disabled people, I’m exceptionally innovative – we have to be.  I started roasting vegetables, such as sweet potato or butternut squash. After an hour or two you can remove the softened peel from the flesh of the veg with your hands. A couple of hours roasting however is not exactly environmentally nor financially friendly on the energy front. Also, you still need a degree of ability to achieve this now simplified task. A month or two later, even with the aid of my ‘perching stool’ (also made from none recyclable materials), I no longer had that ability either. I then tried eating all veg in ‘shavings’ form – basically I peeled them.  For a while that was ok but then I lost that ability too.  

This situation may sound ‘alien’ to many of you; something you just cannot empathise with… yet. I assure you all, whether it be through disability, ill health or old age, most, if not all of you will inevitably one day need pre-prepared food. When that day comes you won’t be ready for it, you’ll feel it’s too soon and you’ll feel a multitude of emotions that come with that change. I only hope when that day comes you don’t have people shaming you and calling you lazy for what you are not physically able to do.  Please try and remember when you comment on the ‘laziness’ of others that most people, like myself, didn’t arrive at ‘pre-prepared veg’ without working really hard to find an alternative first.  We worked hard, we put the time and effort in to both research and practice with alternatives.  We did our bit. We did our duty.

So, how about you do yours M&S?

The problem is the packaging and that’s firmly on you, the manufacturer and supplier.  The problem is not the ease or pre–prepared nature of the food, nor is it the people who require it.  We are not lazy. We are unable.  We are not the problem. We have physical limitations, time limitations, waste limitations (we also don’t want to waste food, which is another problem with larger portions). We need that food pre-prepared. You do not need to package it in an abundance of plastic. So the only party here who doesn’t have an essential need, who has the privilege of choice, is you M&S. You could have chosen to support your customer base and change the packaging to, for example, a paper bag but you didn’t; you chose the easy route and removed the product. You displaced the problem, the blame and the resolution not just onto your customers but onto the most vulnerable of your customers (including but not exclusive to pensioners, the incapacitated and the disabled.)

I Imagineif M&S suddenly released a statement saying they’re no longer selling baby formula as it promotes the use of plastic bottles over the more environmentally friendly option of breastfeeding, the uproar would quite rightly be deafening.  The presumption of privilege, evident to many in that example, may not be as apparent with disability but it’s there and our community is suffering greatly because of it. Ultimately, one way or another, most of you will sadly experience this form of ableism first hand, one day.

So I challenge you M&S, to put your customers first and speedily set about resolving this issue by reinstating the existing pre-prepared veg, until you come up with a more environmentally friendly alternative to package it in. I’ve already proposed one alternative. If you’d like a group of disabled customers to aid you and brainstorm, you can contact me in the comments and I’ll be sure to point you in the right direction. Or simply make contact via Twitter, you’ll find thousands of us on there, waiting and ready to engage.  

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/pre-prepared-vegetables-are-a-necessity-for-those-of-us-with-disabilities-excess-packaging-is-not_uk_5a58afaee4b04df054f81cbd

Pressure For BBC’s John Humphrys To Step Aside After Gender Pay Gap Jibes

Pressure For BBC’s John Humphrys To Step Aside After Gender Pay Gap Jibes
BBC faced a fierce backlash from female MPs, campaigners and even its own stars, after veteran presenter John Humphrys worked as normal on Friday despite mocking its gender pay gap.

The corporation faced calls to make Humphrys, 74, step aside from presenting duties after audio transcripts leaked last night showed him jesting about the gap with another male colleague.

The presenter, who fronted BBC Radio 4′s Today programme as normal on Friday morning, was revealed to be paid more than £600,000 last year, making him one of the Beeb’s highest-paid stars.

It comes after bosses this week demanded those who have given support to the ‘#BBCWomen’ campaign to achieve equal pay stand down from reporting the topic.

That rule was enforced after the intervention of former China editor Carrie Gracie this weekend, and saw Gracie herself made to sit silently on Monday while Humphrys reported on her case.

Labour’s Stella Creasy told HuffPost UK that it was “unfair” some stars have been stopped from speaking while Humphrys continued to work.

“This shows the BBC needs to ensure equal pay rather than using editorial guidelines to try to prevent presenters talking about this issue,” the Walthamstow MP said.

“It’s clear everyone has an opinion, so it is unfair to stop some speaking and not others. 

“That some of those opinions appear rooted in the 19th century when it comes to why this matters only further underlines the importance of getting this right.”

Woman’s Hour presenter Jane Garvey, who alongside colleague Winifred Robinson has been banned from reporting on pay disparity, described the corporation as “the Department of Mixed Messages”.

Heading into work at the Department of Mixed Messages, formerly known as the BBC #bbcwomen

— Jane Garvey (@janegarvey1) January 12, 2018

Womens’ Equality Party leader Sophie Walker asked whether Humphrys could continue to report on the gender pay gap following his reported comments. 

Taking this to mean John Humphreys can no longer report on the gender pay gap under the BBC’s impartiality rules. Can you confirm, @BBC? t.co/dqJtijbDhW

— Sophie Walker (@SophieRunning) January 12, 2018

Lib Dem deputy leader Jo Swinson also raised the apparent inconsistency.

So is John Humphrys now banned from presenting stories on the BBC gender pay issue like @wrobinson101 and @janegarvey1 ? #EqualPay#GenderPayGap#EqualPowert.co/dAGBQvYpfs

— Jo Swinson (@joswinson) January 11, 2018

The exchange was reportedly leaked by former Countryfile presenter Miriam O’Reilly, who successfully sued the BBC over age discrimination.

She later denied she was the source of the story, but hit out at the BBC for having an invite to appear on Today withdrawn, while Humphrys was free to present the programme.

″[I]t’s clear there is one rule for male presenters at the BBC and one for women”, O’Reilly said.

I agreed to appear on Today on Weds night. It was confirmed by the programme several times, verbally and in writing. At lunchtime yesterday I was leaked the exchange between Humphrys and Sopel. t.co/oVkqqOgF0O

— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam) January 12, 2018

In my final briefing with the Today producer I asked who was doing the interview with me on #EqualPay The two presenters on this a.m. were Nick Robinson and John Humphrys. I told the producer I had heard the exchange between Humphrys and Sopel and Mr Humphrys was not impartial.

— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam) January 12, 2018

A matter of minutes later the producer rang back sounding a little embarrassed. He said something along the lines of news moves on, full programme, not able to talk to me now etc. He suggested perhaps Saturday. Obvs Mr Humphrys would not be presenting then.

— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam) January 12, 2018

I was disappointed, but mostly cross because the presenter of You and Yours, Winifred Robinson, was stood down from #EqualPay discussion as she had tweeted support for @bbccarrie In the case of Today it was the guest -me -who was stood down rather than Mr Humphrys.

— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam) January 12, 2018

I believe the person who made the decision to stand me down this morning was concerned I would mention the leaked tape on air. If Mr Humphrys was interviewing me I quite possibly would have – but why not – he would have done the same – it’s called freedom of speech.

— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam) January 12, 2018

The BBC did not immediately respond to HuffPost UK’s questions over the situation on Friday.

The scandalous transcripts appeared to depict Humphrys, who also fronts TV’s ‘Mastermind’, mocking the fight to end the pay gap, saying to colleague Jon Sopel: “How much are you prepared to hand over?”

In the transcript, Humphrys addresses the difference in pay between North American editor Sopel, 58, who is paid between £200,000-£249,999, and now former China editor Gracie, 55, who was paid £135,000:

HUMPHRYS:  “The first question will be how much of your salary you are prepared to hand over to Carrie Gracie to keep her and then a few comments about your other colleagues, like our Middle East Editor and the other men who are earning too much…”

SOPEL: “If we are talking about the scope for the greatest redistribution I’ll have to come back and say well, yes, Mr Humphrys, but…

HUMPHRYS: “And I could save you the trouble as I could volunteer I’ve handed over already more than you fucking earn but I’m still left with more than anybody else and that seems to me to be entirely just – something like that would do it?”

SOPEL “Don’t…”

HUMPHRYS:  “Oh dear God. She’s actually suggested that you should lose money; you know that don’t you? You’ve read the thing properly have you?” 

A BBC source previously told HuffPost that management were “deeply unimpressed” by the exchange.

And a corporation spokesperson said on Thursday evening: “This was an ill-advised off air conversation which the presenter regrets. 

“The BBC is committed to getting its pay structures right and, as we have said, we are conducting a comprehensive analysis of presenter pay.

“PwC are working with us on this to ensure an objective external assessment of how we have set pay in the past, what we need to do differently going forward, and what further action we need to take immediately.

“We will publish that in the coming weeks.”

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/john-humphrys-bbc-pay-jon-sopel_uk_5a587953e4b02cebbfdaa008