Deliciously Disabled: Creating a Sexy, Accessible Dialogue to Describe Disability

Deliciously Disabled: Creating a Sexy, Accessible Dialogue to Describe Disability
We all know how important language is to our everyday lives. It helps us to exclaim that we hate Mondays and is there for us when we want to pretend like we know what we’re talking about on a date (c’mon, how many times have you tried to say something intelligent and sexy to the person across the table, when in fact you’ve either confused or offended them?) Language has helped us to identify and connect with each other.

As a person with a disability, I have always found the language that we use to describe disability very interesting. Let’s be honest, we tend to discuss disability in very particular ways: We marinate in medical terminology, choosing to speak only in symptomatology, our dialect all about diagnoses and nothing else whatsoever. This language looks something like: “Andrew’s Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy means that he is nonambulatory, and requires the use of a wheelchair.” This language is important, because it helps to categorize my condition, or catalogue my crippled, if you will. It’s safely couched in medical texts, and can be easily referenced if required. But what is sexy about that language? Picture this: You’re at a coffee house, and you bump into someone who have been eyeing for some time now. You decide to finally approach them (in my head, this is one of those slow motion montages from an ’80s film; but, in real life, I am ploughing my wheelchair into the coffee tables trying to remain suave). Using the above language, here’s how that might look:

In your most seductive voice you say, “Hey. What’s up? I have Spastic Quadriplegia requiring the use of a wheelchair. Wanna hang sometime?” Let’s be real, if someone said that to me, I would half smile and gracefully exit as politely as possible. Note: The only time the word “quadriplegia” is sexy, is when we’re role-playing doctor. Also, it’s not the mouthful that I want you to be worried about.

When we’re not discussing diagnoses and disability, we tend to use “person-first” language when referring to disability. This is the most commonly accepted way to talk about disability today, and looks like this: “Andrew is a person with a disability, who is differently-abled and accesses the world around him in his mobility device.” This language is a great step forward in how we speak about disability, as it understands that the individuals living with disability are people first. This language is suited for the academic and political arenas, but it certainly doesn’t make me want to tear the pants off a PwD and have my way with them. Let’s review:

You’re in this hopping club (yeah, I did just say “hopping”), and this really sexy person is on the dance floor. So, you fight your way through the drunken crowd, indiscriminately running over people, inching closer to your part-time lover, and over the loud Beyonce remix, you say: “Hey! I am a person with a disability. I use my mobility device to get around because I am differently-abled. What are you up to?” This doesn’t exactly seep sexiness, does it?

Ultimately, disability is only described in the most perfunctory of ways. It doesn’t have any buzz or spark about it. Not only is it boring, as I have shown, it is often inaccessible. Many people don’t feel right about using the medical terminology, and person-first language has so many variables, it can seem daunting indeed. Moreover, many people feel they cannot use this language, because disability is not their experience. We need to find a dialogue that everyone can embrace, and that tells them disability is everyone’s experience. What if you meet the sexiest person who just happens to use a wheelchair or walker? How would you want to refer to them?

In the LGBTQ+ community, there are a number of different ways the community describes its members: “bears,” “pups,” “daddies,” “twinks” etc. — each group fiercely represented and connected to this representation. It simply becomes a positive part of the identity, and it is terminology that everyone can access. It is sexy, playful and fun.

We must have the same type of language to describe disability. We must use words that aren’t weighed down by malady or political posturing. A few months ago, I was part of a local photo shoot for people embracing their bodies for the new year. During the interview, I was asked how I wanted to describe myself. All of a sudden, I blurted out: “I am deliciously disabled.” In that very moment, I knew I had created a new model for disability that would allow for everyone, whether disabled or not, to be a part of the conversation. It was fun, it is playful, and most importantly, it is tastefully different than what is currently on offer.

It reminds us that disability should be seen as sexy and fun, instead of sad and frustrating all the time. Being deliciously disabled doesn’t mean that there aren’t days where the experience of disability is altogether exhausting. Rather, it is a lexicon that accepts disability as is, not for what it should or could be. Deliciously disabled does not theorize, deconstruct or politicize disability, it shows that disability is a flavor that we should all get a taste of.

Also, let’s be honest, it is a pretty sexy way to describe disability, isn’t it? Let’s go back to our bar/coffee shop scenario. You approach the really sexy guy in your wheelchair, and he says:

“Hey!” He nervously approaches you, “Can I ask what happened to you?” You smile coyly, and continue spastically dancing to the song, and without missing a step you say: “Nothing happened, I am deliciously disabled.” In that moment you have allowed for him to see that you are owning your disability, and also welcoming him into it, helping him to form a positive representation of disability going forward.

Language is an important part of our identities. It can connect us to one another, and helps us to understand the world around us. In terms of disability, language has been used to describe our prognosis. It has been used to politicize us and help us to define our personhood. Sadly, not any of this language has portrayed us as playful, powerful and provocative. Deliciously disabled is a movement which aims to do just that, while also offering everyone a seat at the table.

Andrew Morrison-Gurza also writes for The Mobility Resource, where this piece first appeared.

To find out more about the #DeliciouslyDisabled movement, and find out how you can get involved, please head over to www.andrewmorrisongurza.com

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-morrisongurza/deliciously-disabled-creating-a-sexy-accessible-dialogue-to-describe-disability_b_7088246.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Vietnamese Officials Can’t Handle A Sudden Influx Of Gay Erotic Novels Being Funneled Into The Country

Vietnamese Officials Can’t Handle A Sudden Influx Of Gay Erotic Novels Being Funneled Into The Country

9GatbhhoVietnam’s Ministry of Information and Communication is freaking out over what it describes as a flash flood of “oversentimental sex fiction of Chinese origin” somehow making its way into the country.

That’s right, Vietnamese bookstores are being overrun with “rubbish Chinese fiction which is rife with mawkish and sexual elements,” a local newspaper reports.

According to Tuoi Tre, there are two sub-genres of erotic novel that are being snatched up by Vietnamese teenagers and young adults faster than publishers can print them.

“One comprises shoddily written soppy stories which depict promiscuous characters and their casual sexual relationships,” the newspaper claims.

Sounds hot.

“The other,” the paper continues, “is those in which the writers make it a point to describe sex scenes between characters in great, obscene detail … Among hugely popular stories are those depicting in great depth homosexual relationships.”

Even better!

The books have proved to be incredibly lucrative for Vietnamese publishers, with many titles retailing for nearly $30 US and selling millions–yes, millions–of copies. Tuoi Tre reports that some of the titles have been read “over 10 million times and receive some thousands of comments.”

Seriously, we’ve got to get our hands on one of these novels!

Ministry of Information and Communications publishing department director Chu Van Hoas says the books are toxic and is urging publishers to cease distributing the material both in print and online.

Rather than shutting down publishers or websites, however, the government plans to issue fines to any companies caught publishing the sexually graphic books, as well as encourage online platforms to monitor the kind of material it published by users.

Hmmm. 10 million copies at $30 US a pop. For some reason, we don’t see this “problem” going away any time soon.

Related stories:

10 Spring Recommendations For All You Sexy Book Nerds

Hollywood Shocker! Faye Dunaway Reportedly Writing Book About Mommie Dearest

The Bizarre World Of Gay Dinosaur Erotica Is Very Much A “Thing”

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/VksyTkwdPk4/vietnamese-officials-cant-handle-a-sudden-influx-of-gay-erotic-novels-being-funneled-into-the-country-20150417

Romania's Got Talent Judge Calls Gays 'Abnormal,' Lashes Out Against Conchita Wurst and Political Correctness

Romania's Got Talent Judge Calls Gays 'Abnormal,' Lashes Out Against Conchita Wurst and Political Correctness

Mihaela Rădulescu
(Image via Facebook)

Romanian TV Star Defends Partner Felix Baumgartner’s Attack On Gay Rights

A Romanian television star has publicly called gay people abnormal and asked for gay couples to refrain from public displays of affection, reports Gay Star News.

Referring to gays as “you abnormal people,” Romania’s Got Talent judge Mihaela Rădulescu compared LGBTI people with terrorists and called for public LGBTI events to be banned.

Rădulescu also called Eurovision winner Conchita Wurst “a woman who was a man but can’t let go of the beard” and said that increased rights for gay people would “infringe on the majority’s right to disagree with their lifestyle.”

Rădulescu’s comments were inspired by a Facebook post by her partner Felix Baumgartner written in defense of Austrian folk singer Andreas Gabalier, who had complained at an awards ceremony that “it’s not easy in this world if, as a man, you still like women.” When booed by the audience, Gabalier said “politically correct” people should be more tolerant of his intolerance.

 

Toll, Toller, TOLERANZ!Man(n) kann diesem Burschen nur gratulieren! Da stellt sich einer auf die Bühne einer Musik…

Posted by Felix Baumgartner on Saturday, 4 April 2015

 Rădulescu has since backtracked on her comments with the old “some of my best friends are gay” chestnut.

 


Jim Redmond

www.towleroad.com/2015/04/romanian-tv-star-defends-partner-felix-baumgartners-attack-on-gay-rights.html

Award Inspired by Martin Luther King Goes to … Antigay Justice Roy Moore

Award Inspired by Martin Luther King Goes to … Antigay Justice Roy Moore

In a move that will strike some as curious, a pastors’ group presents the Letter From Birmingham Jail Award to the jurist leading the charge against marriage equality in Alabama.

read more

Trudy Ring

www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2015/04/17/award-inspired-martin-luther-king-goes-antigay-justice-roy-moo

Homosexuality Has Cost The U.S. Government 'More Than $225 Billion,' Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver Claims

Homosexuality Has Cost The U.S. Government 'More Than $225 Billion,' Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver Claims
Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver slammed the “cost of homosexuality” in a radio bulletin this week.

Staver, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, claimed that the U.S. government has spent “more than $225 billion” on homosexuality over the course of 26 years, resulting in “the breakdown of the family culture” and other “social consequences,” Right Wing Watch first reported.

Founded in 1989, the Liberty Counsel is a nonprofit Christian policy organization whose aim is to “preserve religious liberty and help create and maintain a society in which everyone will have the opportunity to discover the truth that will give true freedom,” according to its website.

“Studies repeatedly show that homosexual conduct can result in significant cost to the community that encourages it,” he says, though he does not specify the “studies” he is referencing nor provides any additional background information, in the bulletin. “Same-sex marriage leads to the devaluation of both a mother and a father, who each provide a unique contribution to the family.”

Staver’s remarks echo those he made at a “Celebrate America” event in Washington D.C. last year. At the time, he argued that homosexuality is “unique from any other sin” because it is a “sin against your own body” and “a direct attack on who God is.”

The right-wing lawyer and pundit, who has praised Russia, Uganda and Nigeria for their anti-LGBT laws, has also argued that the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Prop 8 were not reflective of “natural law, biblical law or common sense; it is contrary to the natural created order of God almighty.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/17/mat-staver-homosexuality-_n_7087168.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Rick Santorum And Ted Cruz Pressed On Whether They’d Attend A Gay Wedding

Rick Santorum And Ted Cruz Pressed On Whether They’d Attend A Gay Wedding

Screen Shot 2015-04-17 at 9.45.35 AMWhen contemplating same-sex marriage, it’s important to take into consideration how it might affect straight guys who don’t know any gay people. They really have the best perspective, don’t you think?

Conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt really got to the heart of the debate when he asked Rick Santorum and Ted Cruz to blabber about gay marriage as if it had one single damn thing to do with them. Hugh also asked them if they’d attend the same-sex wedding of a loved one.

Their answers are positively heartwarming — surely just what Jesus would have said.

Rick Santorum’s response was a predictable “no,” couched with some garbage about how it violates his faith but he’d still love the person because he’s a good Christian. Please go home, Rick.

Ted Cruz tried to tap dance a little, but his response is so clearly indicative of the problem.

So, Ted — would you attend the same-sex wedding of a friend, family member or loved one?

“I have not faced that circumstance. I have not had a loved one have a gay wedding.”

He also doesn’t understand the concept of a hypothetical question, and he does go on to spout this nonsense:

“What the media tries to twist the question of marriage into…is a battle of emotions and personalities. They try and make it say, for example, ‘gosh any conservative must hate people who are gay.’ As you know, that has nothing to do with the operative legal question…I’m a constitutionalist, and under the constitution, from the beginning of this country, marriage has been a question for the states.”

Why would marriage make people emotional, we wonder?

Fellow Republican Christian Marco Rubio also opposes gay marriage and was asked the same question. He was the only one who sounded vaguely human. “If there’s somebody that I love that’s in my life, I don’t necessarily have to agree with their decisions or the decisions they’ve made to continue to love them and participate in important events,” he said.

Listen to the two clips below:

Dan Tracer

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/ypir7KhIgHE/rick-santorum-and-ted-cruz-pressed-on-whether-theyd-attend-a-gay-wedding-20150417