Why Zachary Quinto Doesn't Have A Problem With 'Celebrity Queerbaiting'

Why Zachary Quinto Doesn't Have A Problem With 'Celebrity Queerbaiting'
Zachary Quinto sounded off on the likes of male stars like James Franco and Nick Jonas, who have been criticized for “queerbaiting” their gay fans with steamy photo shoots and same-sex love scenes in movies even though they identify as straight in their offscreen lives.

Quinto, who stars opposite Franco in 2015’s “I Am Michael,” told HuffPost Live host Josh Zepps that he didn’t have an issue with the phenomenon, saying, “These guys who are, in many ways, considered very conventionally desirable, attractive leading men… lending themselves to these kinds of stories is a valuable thing for our culture.”

He went on to note that A-list Hollywood stars “a generation or two ago, wouldn’t have gone near” a queer narrative onscreen.

The 37-year-old actor, who came out in 2011, shrugged when Zepps asked him why so few gay and lesbian celebrities had addressed their sexuality publicly in 2015.

“I think times are changing rapidly, and I guess it’s just a matter of what people are willing to sacrifice for what they consider to be success or what they consider to be the accomplishments they set out to achieve,” he said. “We’re all on our own journeys.”

The star of “The Slap” also opened up about the controversy that ensued when he urged caution over the use of the HIV/AIDS prevention drug Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP.

“I certainly like to be a part of conversations in our culture, and I’m not particularly afraid to articulate my position or my opinion on things, and if people don’t agree with it, that’s great,” he said. “That fact that the backlash initiated a conversation about [PrEP] on some level — an issue that people are really uncomfortable talking about — I feel like that was my contribution.”

www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/20/zachary-quinto-celebrity-queerbaiting-_n_6716346.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Queerty Readers Respond To News That Men Will Soon Be Able To Regrow Their Foreskin

Queerty Readers Respond To News That Men Will Soon Be Able To Regrow Their Foreskin

1558491_716035748420229_813351398_nYesterday, we reported that a medical research lab is very close to finding a way for circumcised men to regrow their foreskin.

Foregen is “a non-profit organization founded to research and implement regenerative medical therapies for circumcised males” that aims to “promote genital integrity through regenerative medicine.” Lab researchers there just announced that they’ve figured out how to generate new skin using small samples of foreskin tissue. They now hope to move onto human clinical trials sometime in the near future.

The news elicited a strong response to Queerty readers, particularly on Facebook.

“To each his own,” Jerome Robertson wrote, “but I’m not a big fan of uncut ’cause some men are fucking nasty and don’t clean themselves properly.”

(Jeez. Tell us how you really feel, Jerome.)

Naturally, this sparked quite an outcry. Robertson’s comment received over 20 replies.

“You want to talk about nasty?” David Runyan responded. “Let’s talk about trapping an open wound in a diaper with feces and urine every night. Before you cut your son make a small cut on your thigh, get some used toilet paper, get it moist with some urine and tape it to the cut and leave it over night.”

(Um. We think we’ll pass.)

“My feet get dirty because I walk around barefoot sometimes,”Jeremy Homer added, “but I’m not going to cut them off for the sake of being clean.”

(Hmmm. That seems like a bit of a stretch.)

“You’re missing my point,” Robertson rebutted. “I shouldn’t have to tell a grown man to clean his penis. That’s something he should have been taught by his parents.”

To which Cassie Elizabeth Waldeck replied with this pearl of wisdom, “If my circumcised husband doesn’t shower his balls stink. Circumcised men still need to wash their genitals.”

(This is true. Circumcised men, like uncircumcised men, need to properly wash themselves. Surely we can all agree on that.)

Then David J. Bernstein posted this super helpful flyer:

10991044_10153210074983083_9058472438285912013_n

Madeline Rupert opined: “Some men are fucking nasty. And you know what? Cutting pieces of their genitals off won’t make them cleaner in any respectable degree.”

William Ortego concurred. “These men deserved to keep their penis intact but asshole parents took that from them!”

Other people had questions regarding the new reparative therapy:

“If it grows back looking like Abe Vigoda’s neck, do you get your money back?” Pablito Belanger asked.

“How can someone miss something they never had?” William Mc Gregor wondered.

And some had absolutely no interest in it whatsoever:

Not my cup of tea,”James Michael said. “I’ll stay circumcised.”

“No thank you,” Bobby Smith politely declined.

“I think science would be more useful if they cured male-pattern baldness,” Queerty commenter Desert Boy said.

But perhaps Jorge L Mancha put it best when he wrote: “Everyone has their preferences. Why don’t we just leave it at that?”

So what do you think of the latest technology that may allow circumcised men to regrow their foreskin? Keep the conversation going in the comments section below.

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/XZsevvrwTag/queerty-readers-respond-to-news-that-men-will-soon-be-able-to-regrow-their-foreskin-20150220

Zachary Quinto Teases His Nearly Nude Upcoming Appearance on 'Girls' – VIDEO

Zachary Quinto Teases His Nearly Nude Upcoming Appearance on 'Girls' – VIDEO

Quinto

Zachary Quinto stopped by Late Night with Seth Meyers last night and revealed that he will be featured in a very revealing two episode arc on this season of HBO’s Girls.

Teased Quinto:

You will see a lot of me on Girls…even though I only did two episodes.

Hayes follows up by asking if we’ll get to see “full Quinto” on the show.

Find out, AFTER THE JUMP

Previously, “Zachary Quinto Fills In Andy Cohen about His Threesome with James Franco and Charlie Carver: VIDEO” [tlrd]

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/02/quinto_girls.html

Doctor Who Turned Away Gay Moms Isn't the Real Problem — Here's What Is (Video)

Doctor Who Turned Away Gay Moms Isn't the Real Problem — Here's What Is (Video)
By now, you might’ve heard about the pediatrician in Michigan who turned away two lesbian moms and their 6-day-old daughter.

As a gay man, I thought I’d be outraged by the case, but as I read the details I was surprised by my actual response: sympathy for the doctor. Yes, really!

Her name’s Vesna Roi, and she’s been caring for babies for decades. In an apology note to the moms, she explained that “much prayer” had led her to believe that she “would not be able to develop the personal patient doctor relationship” with Krista and Jami Contreras and their newborn, Bay.

That and the “much prayer” comment tell us everything we need to know about what’s really going on here: she’s uncomfortable with lesbian couples. Okay, sure, fine. So are lots of people! Other people are uncomfortable around interracial couples, or Catholics, or babies. Personally, I’m uncomfortable around clowns.

I’m sympathetic to Dr. Roi because she probably feels that she made the right choice: if she didn’t think she could form a strong relationship with the family, and knew that another doctor could probably do better, shouldn’t they go to whoever can provide the best possible care?

After all, if I was a doctor and a clown came to me for treatment, we would probably both be happier if I sent him to a colleague, rather than huddling in a corner in terror with a tongue-depressor as my only means of self-defense.

But clown-discrimination isn’t really a thing, and the patient could always just take off his big red nose. (Unless that’s his actual nose, in which case he would probably need a specialist.)

So imagine if the stakes were higher, and there was a bigoted doctor who just didn’t like treating black people. Or Jews. Or foreigners. That wouldn’t be okay, since those attributes are fundamental to a person’s identity, and the country has a pervasive history of terrible inequality on those grounds. That’s why that kind of discrimination has been banned nationwide since The Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Race, gender, national origin, and religion are all protected against discrimination, and if any business — doctor, lawyer, florist, cobbler — tried to turn someone away because of those classifications, there’d be an uproar. And rightly so! Not just because it’s morally loathsome, but because who knew there were still cobblers?

But only a few states add sexual orientation to that list of protected attributes, which is why Dr. Roi’s refusal to see the Contreras family was perfectly legal in Michigan. In California, she could have been sued. It’s what I refer to as “The Big Gay Loophole” in The Civil Rights Act.

I put together this video to explain why businesses in so many states are allowed to just kick gay customers out the door:

I understand why Dr. Roi thought she was making the right choice. She felt that she was acting in the Contreras’ best interests — not to mention her own. In that respect, she’s just like me, and pretty much everyone, in that she’d rather not put herself in an uncomfortable situation. I totally understand.

But sometimes, uncomfortable situations are how we grow and improve. Not just as individuals, but as a country. When the Civil Rights Act passed, there were lots of doctors (and lawyers and florists etc.) who didn’t want any black clients. Nondiscrimination laws forced Americans to confront their discomfort and, in time, begin to get over it. And maybe someday we’ll finish getting over it.

Of course, the most mouth-foaming of homophobes, like Pat Robertson, love to claim that this is an attack on religion. Selling flowers to a gay couple, he recently said, is like blessing a marriage between a man and a dog, which is a terribly polite way to talk about two people in love. Of course, nobody’s attacking religious liberty. A florist who sells flowers to gays will discover that he’s still free to practice his religion however he likes. Who knows, maybe he’ll find that gay people aren’t actually as bad as he thought. And if Pat Robertson really believes that the union of a loving, long-term, committed couple is the same as marrying a dog, then he’s the one who doesn’t understand what marriage is.

So let’s be clear: I get why Dr. Roi thought she was making a compassionate choice. But I don’t think she (or any other business) should be allowed to turn away gay clients, any more than a restaurant can have a no-interracial-couples rule, no matter how uncomfortable interracial couples make them.

What’s needed is federal protection against discrimination. We need to add sexual orientation and gender identity to the groups covered by The Civil Rights Act. The Contreras family should have the same right as any other disfavored group to sue someone who illegally discriminates against them.

And even in the states where sexual orientation discrimination is legal, I think it’s still a mistake to do so — just as sexism was a mistake before The Civil Rights Act came along.

If Roi was prohibited from discriminating, then yes, the first few lesbian moms she sees might sense a little nervousness on her part. All she has to say is, “I’ve never had lesbian patients before, so I hope I can provide you with the best possible care, and please let me know if you feel like this isn’t working out.”

I’d be a little nervous about being the first patient to see a doctor who’s still getting over her fear of me. But it’s better than the alternative: allowing prejudices and fears to calcify to the point that they’re impossible to remove from our culture.

I’m still struggling with my fear of clowns, but fortunately in the grand scheme of things it really isn’t that important. But a doctor who can’t provide fair treatment to the patients who come to her? That’s a problem, and one that a smart, caring, sensitive caregiver can overcome.

It’s not Dr. Roi’s fault that she’s uncomfortable with people who aren’t like her — that’s just how humans are. Some of us recognize our irrational fears and try to address them. Others need a little nudge now and then to rethink our assumptions. A sometimes, we need the power of law to remind us that staying in our comfort zones can have serious consequences.

www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-baume/video-doctor-who-turned-away-gay-moms_b_6716434.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices