Category Archives: MISC

‘Will & Grace’ Reboot Comes To Channel 5 As They Pick Up UK Broadcasting Rights

‘Will & Grace’ Reboot Comes To Channel 5 As They Pick Up UK Broadcasting Rights
British ‘Will & Grace’ fans have finally got their wish, as it has been confirmed the new series is coming to the UK.

Channel 5 has announced it has bought the rights to air the reboot of the classic sitcom from January.

The 16-episode series has proved to be a big hit in the US, where it returned to screens after an 11-year absence.

It reunites the original gang of Eric McCormack, Debra Messing, Megan Mullally and Sean Hayes as Will Truman, Grace Adler, Karen Walker and Jack McFarland respectively.

As part of Channel 5′s acquisition, they also have the right to show the next 13-episode season too.

Katie Keenan, VP, Acquisitions, Channel 5 and VIMN UK said: “‘Will & Grace’ is one of the greatest comedy shows of our time, so we’re thrilled to see it return to TV screens.

“With the hugely talented cast reprising their roles and tackling the issues of today with their razor-sharp wit, ‘Will & Grace’ will become ‘must-see’ television in 2018.”

‘Will & Grace’ originally aired from 1998 until 2006, picking up 16 Emmys and 83 nominations across its run, making it one of the most critically acclaimed series of the last 20 years.

It previously aired in the UK on Channel 4, and its move to Channel 5 will give fans an extra dose of nostalgia, as it will air alongside ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ – just as it used to in its former home.

The new series will debut on Friday 5 January at 10pm on Channel 5.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/will-and-grace-uk-air-channel-5-new-series_uk_5a26a424e4b0f9f0203f3667

GLAAD spotlights Alliance Defending Freedom’s decade long anti-LGBTQ legal strategy

GLAAD spotlights Alliance Defending Freedom’s decade long anti-LGBTQ legal strategy

ADF to appear before Supreme Court tomorrow in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case

NEW YORK – GLAAD, the world’s largest LGBTQ media advocacy organization, today released an outline of the Alliance Defending Freedom’s (ADF) case history working to push the radical narrative that non-discrimination protections violate the rights of those seeking to deny services to marginalized communities, including LGBTQ people. The ADF, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as an anti-LGBTQ hate group, will appear before the Supreme Court of the United States tomorrow as oral arguments in the Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission begin. The case would inscribe hate and discrimination into law by allowing individuals to seek religious exemptions from the existing and future non-discrimination laws intended to protect LGBTQ people.

“With their involvement with Masterpiece Cakeshop, the ADF is attempting to roll back our nation’s progress by pushing discriminatory religious exemptions into law,” said Sarah Kate Ellis, President and CEO of GLAAD. “The twisted narrative they masterminded is part of an insidious strategy that has been pushed by the ADF for decades with the goal of unraveling hard-fought non-discrimination protections for the LGBTQ community.”

The ADF has made it clear that their ultimate goal is to overturn all nondiscrimination laws applying to sexual orientation and gender identity. They are playing a long game of many cuts, and they currently have the full backing of the Trump White House.

Even after the ADF’s long push to normalize their radical agenda the majority of Americans are against religious exemptions to non-discrimination protections. This includes the majority of those of Christian faith the ADF claims to be fighting to protect with only half (50%) of white evangelical Protestants and fewer than half of Mormons (42%), Hispanic Protestants (34%), black Protestants (25%), and Jehovah’s Witnesses (25%) believing that small business owners should be granted permission to refuse services to LGBTQ people, according to a recent PRRI study.

GLAAD has been leading the charge to ask journalists to frame the national discussion around Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission in a fair and accurate way, developing a tip sheet for journalists reporting on religious exemptions, court cases, federal guidance, and legislation and sending an open letter, co-signed by 45 other organizations, calling for newsrooms to reject framing the case around ADF talking points.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Alliance Defending Freedom’s Work to Erode LGBTQ Rights Using Religious Exemptions

 

  • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
    Lakewood, CO; ongoing since 2012

    Colorado baker Jack Phillips desires to turn away same-sex couples seeking his services for their events. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission found that Phillips unlawfully discriminated against one such couple. The Colorado Court of Appeals agreed with the civil rights commission, and the Colorado Supreme Court declined to hear it further. ADF petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.  ADF’s focus is on creative expression rather than the clear cut discrimination at play, arguing that Phillips and others are artisans who should not be forced to use their talents in ways that go against their wishes. In truth, the debate revolves around them as business owners and the demand that all business owners comply with lawful business practices—which is precisely why ADF wants to turn the focus toward the artistry side rather than the business side.
     

  • State of Washington v. Arlene’s Flowers (Ingersoll v. Arlene’s Flowers)
    Richland, Washington; ongoing since 2012

    ADF waged a very public defense of Washington state florist Baronelle Stutzman, a business owner who wishes to turn away same-sex couples who seek her event services. Washington state’s high court has ruled against Stutzman, insisting she and all business owners must apply with state nondiscrimination law. Nevertheless, ADF is persisting all the way to the US Supreme Court, asking the federal high court to reverse the state high court’s ruling against Ms. Stutzman.
     

  • Elane Photography v. Willock
    Albuquerque, NW; began in 2006

    The ADF defended business owners Jonathan and Elaine Huguenin, who turned away a same-sex couple seeking photography services for their commitment ceremony. ADF was unsuccessful in its defense of the Huguenins all the way to the US Supreme Court level, when the high court declined to hear the case, letting stand a New Mexico Supreme Court ruling in favor of the same-sex couple.
     

  • Bishop v. United States (Smith v. Bishop)
    Oklahoma; 2004-2014

    The ADF defended Tulsa County Clerk Sally Howe Smith, who had refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple. ADF and allies were unsuccessful at the federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, where the courts found the Oklahoma marriage amendment to be discriminatory. Then in 2014, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the ADF’s petition in the case, opening the path to marriage equality in the state.  
     

  • Barber v. Bryant | Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant
    Mississippi; ongoing

    ADF is co-counsel in defense of Mississippi’s discriminatory “religious freedom” law, which ADF itself helped to draft. The matter is currently playing out in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
     

  • Adams v. Trustees of the University of North Carolina-Wilmington
    Wilmington, NC; 2007-2011

    Mike Adams is a conservative commentator who has written for outlets like the American Family Association. In this capacity, he has written truly heinous things about LGBTQ people. Mike Adams is also a college professor. It is in this latter capacity that ADF defended Adams arguing that his extreme commentary could not be used against his ability to obtain promotion at his teaching job. ADF was ultimately successful here, giving them a rare LGBTQ-centered win. ADF is quite proud of this win and has heavily promoted its work on this case.
     

  • Zamecnik v. Indian Prairie School District // Nuxoll v. Indian Prairie School District #204 Board of Education
    Naperville, IL; 2006-2011

    ADF defended two different students of the same Illinois high school who fought for the right to wear anti-LGBTQ t-shirts during the school day after one of the students was reprimanded for wearing a shirt reading “Be Happy, Not Gay,” arguing that the students were being prevented from expressing their religious views. While losing in lower court, the ADF was ultimately successful at the 7th Circuit.
     

  • Bernstein v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association
    Ocean Grove, NJ; 2007-2012

    ADF unsuccessfully represents the owners of an open air pavilion that fought to ban same-sex ceremonies from their facilities. The pavilion had been receiving a special tax break that specifically stated it had to welcome all-comers, but the ADF and its clients fought to discriminate, despite the clear case against them.
     

  • Gifford v. Erwin
    Schaghticoke, NY; 2012-2016

    ADF represented upstate New York business owners who run a wedding business on their farmland. The couple, Cynthia and Robert Gifford, denied wedding services to a lesbian couple, and the couple filed suit. ADF unsuccessfully shepherded the Gifford’s case through the NY court system, culminating in loss at the state Supreme Court Appellate Division. The Giffords were ordered to pay a fine and damages, as well as provide sensitivity classes for employees.
     

  • Baker v. Wildflower Inn
    Lyndonville, VT; 2011

    ADF represented Vermont innkeepers who denied a lesbian wedding. ADF lost.
     

  • Wathen v. Timbercreek Bed and Breakfast
    Paxton, IL; 2011-2016

    ADF unsuccessfully represented an Illinois bed and breakfast that fought to deny a civil unions ceremony to a same-sex couple.
     

  • Cervelli v. Aloha Bed and Breakfast
    Hawaii Kai, HI; 2011-2013

    ADF unsuccessfully represented a bed and breakfast that discriminated against a lesbian couple interested in staying on site.
     

  • Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America, 2011

    ADF filed a friend of the court brief in this case on behalf of a group of conservative military chaplains, arguing that repealing the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy would threaten their religious liberty.
     

  • Cochran v. City of Atlanta
    Atlanta, GA; ongoing since 2015

    The ADF is representing Kelvin Cochran, the former fire chief of the city of Atlanta, GA, who was suspended and ultimately terminated for a book he wrote in which he, among other things, equated homosexuality with bestiality and incest. Despite the obvious concerns that the book raises for the city and the fire department, the fact that Cochran did not receive permission before publishing it, and the mayor of Atlanta flatly stating that Cochran’s choice to speak out about the controversy during his suspension period was a major reason for his eventual firing, ADF ignores the facts and frames Cochran’s termination as nothing more than religious discrimination.
     

  • Harper v. Poway Unified School District
    San Diego, CA; 2004-2011

    ADF represented Chase Harper, a California high school student who fought to wear a shirt calling homosexuality “shameful.” ADF lost at the 9th Circuit and unsuccessfully appealed to SCOTUS.

  • Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley
    Augusta, GA; 2010-2012

    ADF represented Jennifer Keeton, an Augusta State University student who claimed she could not complete the requirements of her graduate counseling program because of her religious opposition to homosexuality. ADF lost in federal court.
     

  • Ward v. Polite
    Detroit, MI: 2009-2012

    ADF represented Julea Ward, an Eastern Michigan University graduate student who argued that her religion prevented her from providing fair and accurate counseling regarding LGBTQ people.
     

  • Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals
    Lexington, KY; ongoing since 2012

    ADF is representing Kentucky printer Blaine Adamson in an ongoing case involving his refusal to print LGBTQ-friendly t-shirts for the 2012 Lexington Pride Festival. The case now sits in the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

  • Sklar v. Clough
    Atlanta, GA; 2006-2008

    ADF represented two Georgia Institute of Technology students who cited their religion as reason to oppose a university “Safe Space” program supporting LGBTQ students.
     

  • Lopez v. Candaele
    Los Angeles, CA; 2009-2011

    ADF represented a student who claimed that a professor showed adverse action toward him due to his anti-LGBTQ Christian beliefs. The case died at the 9th Circuit, with an ADF loss.
     

  • Horizon Christian Fellowship v. Williamson
    Massachusetts; 2016

    ADF represented four churches worried that the inclusion of gender identity in state nondiscrimination laws would force them to open up facilities to transgender people. There really was no suit to be had, since churches were exempt (though ADF claims the state made changes as a result of their suit). The whole thing was dismissed.
     

  • Fort Des Moines Church of Christ v. Jackson
    Des Moines, IA; 2016

    ADF filed a lawsuit against the Iowa Civil Rights Commission alleging state and municipal antidiscrimination laws unconstitutionally interfere with the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of its client, Fort Des Moines Church, despite the fact that the church had no tangible infringement to report. ADF’s motion was denied in District Court since, essentially, this was a theoretical complaint in search of a legitimate controversy.
     

  • Knapp v. City of Coeur d’Alene
    Couer D’Alene, IA; 2015

    ADF represented a Christian couple who wished to limit their wedding chapel to only straight couples.
     

  • 303 Creative v. Elenis
    Denver, CO; ongoing since 2016

    ADF is representing a Colorado graphic designer named Lorie Smith, who wishes to create websites geared toward weddings, but to exclude same-sex couples who seek her services. The suit (known as a “pre-enforcement challenge”) is designed to chip away at a law before any complaint arises. In short: no one has complained about or sued ADF’s client; they are simply trying to reshape the law before any complaint arises.
     

  • Telescope Media Group v. Lindsey
    Minneapolis, MN; 2017

    ADF is representing a Minnesota couple that wishes to exclude same-sex couples from its wedding videography business. The lawsuit (another “pre-enforcement challenge) challenges a portion of Minnesota law applicable to human rights, in hopes of weakening/overturning it.
     

  • Brush & Nib Studio v. City of Phoenix
    Phoenix, AZ; 2017​

    ​​​​​​Yet another “pre-enforcement challenge,” this one is aimed at the city code of Phoenix, AZ, where ADF’s clients wish to limit their custom artwork (including wedding invitations) only to opposite-sex/heterosexual/(and presumably)cisgender clients. This particular case has already been tossed out of Superior Court, but ADF has appealed.
     

  • Amy Lynn Photography Studio v. City of Madison
    Madison, WI; 2017

    Another pre-enforcement challenge, this one involving a photographer and blogger who is hoping to bring down a local nondiscrimination ordinance.
     

  • Southworth v. Board of Regents University of Wisconsin System
    Madison, WI; 1996-2014

    ​​​​​​​ADF represented a student who claimed that forcing him to pay student fees to support on-campus clubs was a violation of his religious beliefs, specifically citing the school’s LGBTQ club as an organization he found objectionable.

December 4, 2017

www.glaad.org/blog/glaad-spotlights-alliance-defending-freedoms-decade-long-anti-lgbtq-legal-strategy

#AM_Equality Tipsheet: December 4, 2017

#AM_Equality Tipsheet: December 4, 2017

TOMORROW — SCOTUS TO HEAR ARGUMENTS IN MASTERPIECE CASE OF BUSINESS THAT TURNED AWAY SAME-SEX COUPLE: It involves a baker who refused to serve a gay couple in violation of Colorado’s statewide nondiscrimination law. The baker, who lost before the Colorado Supreme Court, has been granted a Supreme Court hearing to make a claim that he should be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people on religious freedom and freedom of speech grounds. The Trump-Pence Administration has also entered this case to back the baker’s claim. Conversely, HRC believes that the First Amendment cannot and should not be distorted as a weapon of discrimination. And the argument is simple: businesses should be able to decide what to serve, but not who to serve. HRC has organized two major amicus briefs in this case: one on behalf of major American businesses; and a second on behalf of top chefs and bakers in all 50 states, including notable culinary leaders including Jose Andres, Tom Colicchio, Elizabeth Falkner, Carla Hall and Padma Lakshmi. This case, which will be decided by next June, will either protect the fundamental equality of LGBTQ people — or it could set a dangerous precedent giving businesses a license to discriminate. More from CBS.

  • The Associated Press’ Mark Sherman (@shermancourt) reports on how Masterpiece echoes 1968 SCOTUS Piggie Park case of a barbecue restaurant chain that refused to serve Black customers. A lower court judge wrote that the restaurant owner has a right to espouse religious beliefs, but not “the absolute right to exercise and practice such beliefs in utter disregard of the clear Constitutional rights of other citizens;” SCOTUS justices called the BBQ owner’s attempt to recoup legal costs “frivolous.” The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund focused  their amicus brief in Masterpiece on this case which they argued before SCOTUS. Read about it at the AP.

“Put simply, you can’t offer business services to the general public and then pick and choose your customers because of who they are.” #OpenToAll t.co/Gaiw5AFbcu

— HumanRightsCampaign (@HRC) December 2, 2017

LATER TODAY IN MEXICO — HRC LAUNCHING FIRST INTERNATIONAL REPORT RECOGNIZING EMPLOYERS FOR LGBTQ INCLUSION: The groundbreaking HRC Equidad MX: Global Workplace Equality Program, will be launched later today by HRC Foundation at PEMEX Auditorio in Mexico City. It introduces a first-of-its-kind assessment designed to help promote LGBTQ-inclusive policies and practices in workplaces across Mexico. Thirty-two multinational employers including Accenture, Citibanamex, Google, Kellogg, MasterCard earned top ratings in the inaugural report, reflecting a commitment to creating welcoming, inclusive work environments for LGBTQ employees. For information on the event, please contact [email protected].

MUST WATCH MONDAY — HUNDREDS MOBILIZE TO THIS WEEK TO STAND WITH TRANS YOUTH: Mount Horeb, Wisconsin, is the self-described troll capital of the U.S.. It’s also where an extraordinary story of a town banding together to lift up an LGBTQ child unfolded. Watch this heartwarming account of the power of local activism taking on outside extremists here. And learn how to host your own reading from HRC.

SENATE REPUBLICANS PASS TRUMP-PENCE ‘TAX’ SCHEME THAT INCLUDES DANGEROUS ATTACK ON ACA: Saturday morning, Senate Republicans passed a bill that repeals the ACA’s individual mandate that requires all Americans to have health insurance or pay a penalty. This provision was at the heart of the Trump-McConnell failed effort to repeal the ACA earlier this summer. According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, repealing the individual mandate could result in 13 million people leaving the insurance market, immediately causing insurance premiums to soar and leave millions more priced out of access to healthcare. Furthermore, the revenue losses triggered by the bill are likely to result in future spending cuts to critical health programs like Medicare, Medicaid, global HIV/AIDS programs, the Ryan White Care Act, and other essential domestic discretionary programs. More from HRC.

The consequences of this vote will be devastating to millions of Americans. Voters see through this harmful GOP tax scam. Prediction: American voters won’t forget this night. Republicans in swing states will regret this vote in 2018, 2020 and beyond.

— Chad Griffin (@ChadHGriffin) December 2, 2017

HRC RESPONSE TO PA GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE PAUL MANGO’S SUPPORT OF ANTI-TRANS LEGISLATION: “These outrageous comments are disqualifying,” said JoDee Winterhof, HRC’s Senior Vice President for Policy and Political Affairs. “To be clear, Paul Mango is proposing to take Pennsylvania down the same path of anti-LGBTQ discrimination that has wracked North Carolina since the passage of their infamous HB2 law. In North Carolina, HB2 not only put countless LGBTQ people at risk, it resulted in a surge of hate violence and at least $886.4 million in economic losses as business fled the state. It also, notably, led to the defeat of the governor who signed it into law. On top of that, Paul Mango is running on a platform of defunding Planned Parenthood, one of the most crucial health care providers for the LGBTQ community. Paul Mango would do well to remember there are 360,000 LGBTQ voters — and millions more allies across the state of Pennsylvania — who won’t stand for these kinds of attacks on our community and our health care.” More from HRC.

WHITE HOUSE LEAVES BLACK, LGBTQ REPORTERS OFF HOLIDAY PARTY INVITE: Notably, American Urban Radio Networks’ April Ryan (@AprilDRyan) and The Washington Blade’s Chris Johnson (@chrisjohnson82) — both members of the White House Press Corps — were not invited. Ryan has attended every holiday party for the past 20 years. Earlier this year, Johnson went months without having White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders respond to his questions during briefings. More from NewNowNext and Newsweek.

  • In a piece today in The New York Times, “Trump’s Racist Tweets. My Patriotism,” Kashana Cauley (@kashanacauley) writes powerfully about how the president’s anti-Black animus has inspired her, and her faith in the nation. Read more at NYT.

PAID LEAVE CRITICAL FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV: While the Family and Medical Leave Act provides some protections for people living with HIV, not all are eligible to use this critical workplace protection. The LGBTQ community is disproportionately affected by HIV, and inclusive paid leave policies that support LGBTQ people’s right to balance both their health, job, and family are vital. Read more in HRC’s Paid Leave Is Critical for People Living with HIV.

SITKA, ALASKA, TAKES FIRST STEP TOWARD ADOPTING NONDISCRIM ORDINANCE WITH LGBTQ PROTECTIONS: This would be the city’s first nondiscrimination ordinance. More from KCAW.

CONGRATULATIONS TO THE HAPPY COUPLE: Former Secretary of the Army Eric Fanning (@ericfanning) and Ben Masri-Cohen of The National Gallery of Art were engaged in Greece this weekend.

NORTH CAROLINA TRANS ADVOCATE NAMED VOGUE’S “21 UNDER 21”: Hunter Schafer, who sued North Carolina for discrimination because of the state’s anti-transgender HB2 law, appeared in the recent issue guest-edited by Hillary Clinton. More from Teen Vogue.

LGBTQ YOUTH ARE 120 PERCENT MORE LIKELY TO BE HOMELESS: This disturbing statistic comes from a study by Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, and cites lack of acceptance inside and outside of the home as causes. More from Newsweek.

HISTORY MADE IN PALM SPRINGS — ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL IS LGBTQ: New York Times’ Frank Bruni (@FrankBruni) interviews the Palm Springs City Council, comprised of three gay men, a transgender woman and a bisexual woman. Read the full piece from NYT.

HIGHEST COURT IN TURKEY OVERTURNS TRANSPHOBIC LAW: The law required transgender people seeking transition-related surgery to prove they are “unable to procreate.” More from Daily Sabah.

HORRIFYING — POLICE ARREST WOMAN IN TANZANIA FOR SAME-SEX KISS: Tanzania is one of at least 72 countries where same-sex intimate relationships are criminalized. More from Reuters.

READING RAINBOW

St. Louis Public Radio offers tips to journalists covering transgender people; NBC speaks to three HIV advocates active during the epidemic of the 1980s; Forbes dives into the history of Prudential Financial’s annual LGBTQ survey;
 

Have news? Send us your news and tips at [email protected]. Click here to subscribe to #AM_Equality and follow @HRC for all the latest news. Thanks for reading!

www.hrc.org/blog/am-equality-tipsheet-december-4-2017?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Donald Trump Denies Collusion Between His Campaign And Russia After Michael Flynn’s Guilty Plea

Donald Trump Denies Collusion Between His Campaign And Russia After Michael Flynn’s Guilty Plea
Donald Trump has denied there was any collusion between his campaign and Russia after ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn admitted lying to the FBI.

Commenting on the matter for the first time since Flynn’s guilty plea on Friday, the US President told reporters as he departed the White House: “What has been shown is no collusion, no collusion.”

Trump added on Saturday: “There’s been absolutely no collusion, so we’re very happy.”

Flynn was the first member of Trump’s administration to plead guilty to a crime uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller’s wide-ranging investigation into Russian attempts to influence the 2016 US presidential election and possible collusion by Trump aides.

Flynn admitted in a Washington court that he had lied to FBI investigators about discussions he had last December with Russia’s ambassador to the US, Sergei Kislyak.

In what appeared to be moves undermining the policies of outgoing President Barack Obama, the pair discussed US sanctions on Russia, and Flynn asked Kislyak to help delay a United Nations vote seen as damaging to Israel, according to prosecutors.

Flynn also was told by a “very senior member” of Trump’s transition team to contact Russia and other foreign governments to try to influence them ahead of the vote, the prosecutors said.

Sources told Reuters the “very senior” transition official was Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior advisor. Kushner’s lawyer did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Flynn, a former Defense Intelligence Agency director, only held his position as Trump’s national security adviser for 24 days.

He was forced to resign after he was found to have misled Vice President Mike Pence about his discussions with Kislyak.

Flynn, a retired US Army lieutenant, agreed to cooperate with the official investigation as part of his plea on Friday.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trump-denies-collusion-russia-michael-flynn_uk_5a22c7cde4b03c44072de3fa

Girls Aged 16-17 Are Among Highest Users Of NHS Mental Health Services

Girls Aged 16-17 Are Among Highest Users Of NHS Mental Health Services
Young women aged 16 and 17 were the most likely to have had an NHS referral for mental health, learning disability or autism services last year out of all young people, and among the highest service users across the population.

For the first time, NHS Digital’s annual report on these services has included referral statistics for under 18s.

According to the figures, 11% of girls aged 16-17 in England are known to have had an open referral for NHS secondary mental health, learning disabilities or autism services last year.

An “open referral” for secondary services is the term used for when a GP refers a patient to an external specialist service for care. If your health is managed by your GP, this is referred to as “primary care”.

In total, more than 2.6 million people are known to have had an open referral with mental health, learning disabilities and autism services at some point during the year. Of these, 560,000 of these were under 18 years of age.

While 11% of females aged 16-17 received a referral, the figure dropped to 8% for males of the same age.

A total of 2% (1,300) of females in this age group were admitted to hospital as part of their referral. 

A spokesperson from the NHS explained figures around mental health, disability and autism referrals are grouped together because a person with a learning difficulty may also receive support from mental health services. In this instance, a single referral may signify contact with either or both services.

One possible explanation for the significantly higher referrals among 16-17 year old women, could be explained by mental health.

The Mental Health Foundation told HuffPost UK: “These statistics reflect what we might expect to see, knowing the pressures that young women in this age group in particular are under.”

Commenting on the figures, Tom Madders, director of campaigns at the charity YoungMinds, said “we are facing a mental health crisis for children and young people”.

“We know that teenage girls face a huge range of pressures, including school stress, body image, and early sexualisation,” he told HuffPost UK.

“For girls growing up today, there is also the pressure that comes with the 24 hour online world, like creating a personal ‘brand’ from a young age and comparing yourself to a constant feed of ‘perfect’ bodies and lives.”

Sadly, this is something Sarah* has experience of. She was referred to NHS secondary mental health services at the age of 16, after struggling with her mental health since starting secondary school and self-harming.

“I felt sad and it spiralled from there. I got bullied in Year 7, they would call me names, commenting on my weight and laughed at me. I was tired all the time and never found the energy to do school clubs or anything,” Sarah, now 17, told HuffPost UK.

“I didn’t feel the need to socialise with people. I didn’t feel good about myself. I thought I wasn’t normal because I worried about all these things that other people weren’t worrying about.

“I started self-harming, because I didn’t feel like I had a way of talking about or a way of releasing my feelings and I wanted to feel something that wasn’t worry and sad.”

Sarah believes social media is the umbrella cause of a lot of the pressure girls her age feel.

“Everyone has such easy access to seeing other people’s lives. If I look at celebrities, the beauty standards are so high,” she said.

“Although it’s not specifically said that you have to be size 10, it’s very much implied. I get that when I’m looking through social media. I wish I was as skinny as the people I see on Instagram. It spirals from there.”

Thankfully, Sarah accessed the help she needed via the NHS and now doesn’t feel pressured to hide her feelings from her family.

She went to see her GP alongside her parents and was referred onto CAHMS – the NHS-provided Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services – as an emergency case.

“In my head it wasn’t a burden [to talk to the therapist] because it was their job, so I could tell them everything I felt, she said.

“They gave me some copying strategies and how they could work daily.

“Now, I’m a lot more open with my parents and the rest of my family and that’s because I was taught to talk about it with CAHMS. I’m more confident in asking for help if I’m having a hard time and use some self help strategies such as calming myself through relaxing, turning my phone off and music.”

As well as having the highest referral figures among under 18s (11%), young women like Sarah were also among the most regularly referred across the entire population. 

The only higher referral age groups were women above the age of 80, but the NHS report says this is probably explained by the fact that dementia services are counted among these figures.

Dr Amy Pollard, from the Mental Health Foundation, said she’s not surprised “there is a spike in mental health issues for girls aged 16-17 years”.

“16 and 17 year olds are going through a big transition period – taking exams, thinking about their futures, preparing to go to university or leaving home – and we know that transition periods are often times when our mental health is most vulnerable,” she told HuffPost UK.

“Sixteen is also the average age that girls lose their virginity, and stepping into sexual relationships for the first time (or feeling that you are being left behind) can be very stressful experience.

“It is critical that this overlooked crisis is urgently put at the top of the agenda.”

But Kate Elliott, a 26-year-old from York, pointed out that the high level of young women accessing referrals for mental health services could be a good thing.

She began struggling with her mental health at the age of 15, but didn’t seek support initially. It wasn’t until she was 19 that was diagnosed with anorexia, depression and anxiety. She’s also since been diagnosed with OCD.

“I think the statistics are really encouraging; perhaps representing the increase in awareness and understanding for mental health difficulties,” she told HuffPost UK.

“Compared to when I began to struggle with my mental health, it feels that mental health is much more part of everyday life. There are more prominent celebrities and influential figures who are speaking more openly about their own mental health and I think it’s really helping young females to seek support and understand how they would do so.”

She added that when she was a teenager, she was aware that some of her feelings about herself and her body image “weren’t quite right”, but she didn’t know she could seek help for those feelings.

“Mental health is gradually becoming so much less of a taboo subject, particularly with females,” she said, adding that we still have some way to go in normalising mental illness, so that men feel as able to seek support as women.

The Girlguiding Advocate Panel, which is made up of young women aged 14-25, agreed that the high statistics are not necessarily a bad thing.

“It should never be taboo to seek help for a mental health problem, and it’s vital that girls and young women can access the support they deserve,” they told HuffPost UK.

“These numbers may seem high, but with one in four of us experiencing a mental health condition at some point in our lives, it’s positive that many girls and young women feel able to access support.”

They pointed out previous research from Girlguiding found 34% of girls and young women in 2016 said supporting young people with their mental health is the most important way to improve their lives.

“We know that amazing work is being done by so many people to break the mental health stigma. Our own data from our Girls’ Attitudes Survey shows that 65% of girls aged 11-21 say their school, college or university has someone they can speak to about mental health,” they said.

Despite improvements in awareness, Tom Madders from Young Minds believes more needs to be done to ensure all young people can access the mental health support that they need.

“It takes a lot of courage for a young person to reach out for help, but too often that help is not available,” he said.

“That’s why there needs to be sufficient funding for mental health services, as well a focus on wellbeing in schools to prevent problems developing, and we hope to see Government commitment to this in the upcoming children and young people’s mental health green paper.”

*named changed to protect anonymity of speaker

Useful websites and helplines:

Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393
Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill.)
Get Connected is a free advice service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email: [email protected]

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/girls-aged-16-17-are-among-highest-users-of-nhs-mental-health-services-heres-why_uk_5a2000c5e4b037b8ea200c4c

Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack

Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack

Navajo Nation Delegate Amber Kanazbah Crotty released a statement late last night blasting Donald Trump’s racist crack at Elizabeth Warren during a ceremony honoring Navajo Code Talkers at the White House yesterday.

During the ceremony, Trump was standing in front of a portrait of Andrew Jackson, who signed the Indian Removal Act.

Said Trump:

“You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas. But you know what? I like YOU. Because you are special.”

Said Crotty in the statement:

“Today’s careless comment from President Trump is the latest example of systemic, deep-seated ignorance of Native Americans and our intrinsic right to exist and practice our ways of life. The intentional disregard of the historical trauma of Pocahontas as a sexual assault survivor directly resulting from colonization is disturbing.

“The Navajo People are not strangers to the prejudice, discrimination, and marginalization perpetrated by western culture. Our woman and children are targets of violence. We must speak out against such ignorance in every instance, in hopes for a better future for our children and our land.

“I must respond to White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ flat-out denial of this racial slur, dismissing the tangible and egregious impact pejoratives have on Indigenous people. I must respond to President Trump’s remark today referencing Pocahontas. With due respect, it is problematic for the president to use this term in the manner we heard today. It diminishes the experience of Pocahontas and is totally inappropriate. The reckless appropriation of this term is deeply offensive and dangerous to the sovereignty and identity of our peoples. Such rhetoric is damaging, and it a serious infringement of our right to live as Native Americans.

“The Navajo Code Talkers are not pawns to advance a personal grudge, or promote false narratives. Such pandering dishonors the sacrifice of our national heroes. Let me be clear, such antics do not change the fact of history. Indigenous peoples’ disparate socioeconomic issues are a direct result of this false narrative, and we cannot sit idly by as the citizens of the United States and our Indigenous children are gas-lighted from this terrible truth.

“We honor and respect the Navajo Code Talkers, and we are proud of their sacrifice. Let us not allow this display of immaturity and short-sightedness distract us from the important issues we advocate for collectively as sovereign nations on this continent, but continue to advance the cause and secure the future of Indigenous people in America.”

Navajo Nation response to Trump’s insult:
“The Navajo Code Talkers are not pawns to advance a personal grudge…” pic.twitter.com/3KFxlIYOoT

— Ruth H. Hopkins (@RuthHHopkins) November 28, 2017

The post Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack appeared first on Towleroad.


Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack