This Year, Reclaim The Night Is More Significant Than Ever

This Year, Reclaim The Night Is More Significant Than Ever

Please don’t ask me, “what about male victims”, Okay? Let’s get it out the way now, yes men are victims of rape and domestic abuse and absolutely need to be treated with dignity and respect and have access to specialist services and an effective criminal justice system.

But we are looking at repeated incidences of domestic abuse, we are taking into account coercive control and not just physical violence – itself a mechanism of control – and we understand the women whose violence towards men is in retaliation sometimes after years of abuse.  This is gender-based violence.

And the thing is, that every time you ask that, “what about male victims?” it has the same effect as “are you sure it was rape?” or “what’s your sexual history?” or “but where do we draw the line?” It serves to question and undermine the huge courage it takes for any woman to speak up about her experiences of male violence and name it as part of a bigger problem: Me too.

Because what you do is individualise each woman’s experience and label the perpetrators as monsters and aberrations; outliers of our society’s expectations of men. And when you do that not only do you separate women from any sense of solidarity with other women, pointing the finger at her because she was unable to judge the situation correctly or make herself safe or she gave the wrong signals. Not only do you do that to women, but you also give up on men and boys.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying perpetrators shouldn’t face retribution and let’s face it; our criminal justice system is woefully inadequate for the brave minority of women who turn to it. But if we keep trying to brush sexual harassment and violence under the carpet by labelling individual men as the problem, we pretend that our expectations of men and boys are very different to the reality.

 

All over the country over the next few days, people are reclaiming the night; 40 years after women were told to stay home to stay safe

 

If you grow up with anger as the only acceptable emotion to show, that when you cry you’re told to be brave and run along, or worse, that you’re being a “girl” or you’re “gay”. That you should play with lego and soldiers not dolls, and that playing games where you care about a doll are stupid compared to a game where you kill baddies.  And in the same world women and girls exist for your pleasure in pornography, they are your juniors in the workplace, they will do the majority of unpaid child care and care for relatives, where famous football players and film stars can rape or be violent with impunity, and in the locker room other men joke about who they’d like to…This is what we need to talk about, not which ones are the bad men.   

What has been so moving and encouraging about #MeToo, #YoTambien and #BalanceTonPorc, and the continuation of women coming forward to name their experiences and the perpetrators, is that when the world tried to blame individual men and make it go away, we kept saying wait, there’s more. And there’s more. And there’s more. It hasn’t been easy to listen to, and to every woman that said “me too”, to every woman that came forward to name her perpetrator – thank you. And to the great many others who couldn’t, who didn’t want to, and who couldn’t tell if it even was a…

We are with you. 

I hope this is a sea change in how institutions and workplaces handle sexism and sexual harassment and violence. I hope men in senior positions to women and girls think twice before taking advantage of their positions of power. And I hope we don’t stop this conversation.

All over the country over the next few days, people are reclaiming the night; 40 years after women were told to stay home to stay safe. The London march is women-only. I cannot describe to you the feeling of marching alongside a thousand women at night, taking over the streets of central London. The noise, the defiance, the joy and the noise! Yes, there are divisions between us as women; areas of disagreement and power imbalances between us that we need to keep talking and listening about. Tonight we reach for solidarity with each other across those divisions, without denying them. And we say to every woman – we are with you. Shout it with me, “Women, united, will never be defeated”.

Reclaim the Night takes place Saturday 25 November, marking the International Day for the Eliminiation of Violence Against Women.

For more information on Reclaim the Night, including a list of timings, sister marches and speakers, click here

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/reclaim-the-night_uk_5a1981bbe4b0d4906caf0a6f

‘Strictly Come Dancing’ Pro Aljaž Škorjanec Backs Calls For Same-Sex Couples

‘Strictly Come Dancing’ Pro Aljaž Škorjanec Backs Calls For Same-Sex Couples
‘Strictly Come Dancing’ professional Aljaž Škorjanec has backed calls for same-sex couples to be introduced on the show.

The dancer has said he would be open to dancing with a male celebrity and hopes to still be on the show if and when the changes are made.

The BBC has been under increasing pressure to allow same-sex couples to compete, with a number of the ‘Strictly’ team also speaking out about the matter.

Aljaž is the latest star to do so, telling HuffPost UK: “I’ve never actually spoken about it that much, but I’m always going to come in and do the best job I can. It doesn’t matter who it is or what sex they are.

He continued: ″‘Strictly’ has been so successful because it has been the same for the last 14 years and the formula hasn’t changed, so we all trust the producers 100%.

“It’s one of the few shows on television that is done with a positive thought behind it. If they do decide to go down that road, it will be with the most positive intention, so we will follow their lead.

“Hopefully we will be there when it does happen.”

Aljaž’s current partner, former ‘Emmerdale’ star Gemma Atkinson, also added her voice to the debate, but her opinion slightly differed.

She said: “I’m not a pro dancer, but for ‘Strictly’ to get any better, I don’t think that needs to happen – people know it’s 2017 and know people are in same-sex marriages and partnerships.

“I think putting two people on the dancefloor of the same sex will wake people up any more. If it does, then there’s a problem. We should be open to that anyway.”

Earlier this year ‘Strictly’ bosses issued a statement claiming there were “no plans” to deviate from the “traditional format of mixed-sex couples” in the immediate future.

It has been a topic of conversation among the stars of the show, with fellow professional Anton Du Beke previously shared his concerns about how having same-sex couples would affect the scoring, but judge Craig Revel Horwood has called for them to be introduced.

During the interview, Gemma also addressed press coverage about her personal life, amid rumours of a romance with professional dancer Gorka Marquez.

While no mention of any relationship was made, she admitted she has been avoiding reading about herself in the papers.

“I don’t find [media attention] distracting because, without sounding horrible, we don’t pay attention. Everyone in this group knows what’s going on and we know we have a job to do. Anything outside of that and our control,” she explained.

“We said from day one, every time we do a dance, some people will love it, some people will hate it. Every interview, some people will get it, others won’t. We have to have our blinkers on to everything except the dance.”

Aljaž added: “If you are in the competition and you are rehearsing as much as you can, the last thing you have time to do is read about it. If you have time for it, you’re not rehearsing enough.”

‘Strictly Come Dancing’ continues on Saturday at 6.50pm on BBC One.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/strictly-come-dancing-aljaz-skorjanec-same-sex-couples_uk_5a195f11e4b0649480749cb1

The World Is Waking Up To The Injustice Of Violence Against Women

The World Is Waking Up To The Injustice Of Violence Against Women
In recent weeks, harrowing accounts have emerged of systematic and widespread sexual violence inflicted on Rohingya refugees fleeing Rakhine State in Myanmar. Countless women and girls have been gang-raped. According to reports from Human Rights Watch, some have been forced to watch their own children being killed at the same time. Those who survived walked for days, unable to access essential support. Many of the perpetrators, acting with impunity, could walk free.

We know about these horrific acts of gender-based violence in part because they were highly visible and carried out in public, rather than behind closed doors at home. The truth is that globally they are only the tip of the iceberg.

Gender-based violence is too often an invisible injustice, and a silent killer: 119 women are killed every day worldwide by a partner or family member. One in three women experience violence during their lifetime. 37 countries still exempt rape perpetrators from prosecution when they are married to or subsequently marry the victim. There are 750million women today who were married before their 18th birthday.

On this day every year, 25 November, activists and women around the world mark the UN’s International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. Time and again, we are overcome with outrage and frustration that so little progress is being made on gender-based violence. Year on year, the statistics don’t seem to shift.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Violence against women and girls is not inevitable. Women’s groups and activists – who are often the best at bringing about change – are fighting back against gender inequality. They are successfully changing laws on child marriage and female genital mutilation (FGM), or challenging social norms in their communities.

The UK government has done its part internationally, hosting high profile summits to spotlight individual issues and stepping up development funding from just £20million in 2012 to £184million in 2015. But governments such as Canada and Sweden, both of whom have adopted new feminist foreign policies, are also leading the way.

But as my colleague Dawn Butler MP, Labour’s Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities, points out today, the Government must first walk the talk at home. Britain can’t end violence against women overseas while our own Government threatens to strip back essential violence prevention and support services at home.

I want the Government’s Department for International Development (DFID) to go further in combating this global injustice. The next Labour government will task DFID not only with eradicating poverty but also, for the first time, with tackling all inequalities, including gender inequality.

We will establish a new Social Justice Fund to get funding directly to civil society activists in developing countries, including women’s groups who are fighting these problems on the frontline. We must work with like-minded governments to mobilise resources to support women affected by violence, and, crucially, to tackle the root causes of that violence, across the world.

The world is gradually waking up to the entrenched and systemic injustice of violence against women. But, although at times the statistics seem static and unmovable, we must not lose heart. Today we recommit ourselves to moving the dial and ending violence against women. A Labour government that is serious about gender equality – at home and overseas – will make it a priority. 

Kate Osamor is the Labour MP for Edmonton and shadow international development secretary

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/violence-against-women_uk_5a193e40e4b0d4906caefa9b

Donald Trump’s Time Magazine Person Of The Year Tweet Mocked By Andy Murray

Donald Trump’s Time Magazine Person Of The Year Tweet Mocked By Andy Murray

It’s not news that Donald Trump has an ego and constantly attacks the media but never before has the president combined both in one tweet until now.

“Time Magazine called to say I was PROBABLY going to be named “Man (Person of the Year) like last year,” he tweeted.

“But I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!”

Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named “Man (Person) of the Year,” like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 24, 2017

Time’s person of the year award is not meant to be an endorsement but to recognise “the most powerful individuals and forces shaping the world—for better or for worse”. Previous winners include Hitler, Stalin and Vladimir Putin.

This seemed lost on Trump last year, when he won and called it a “great honour”.

Time hit back at Trump’s claim he was “probably” going to win again, saying he was “incorrect” about how the choice was made 

The President is incorrect about how we choose Person of the Year. TIME does not comment on our choice until publication, which is December 6.

— TIME (@TIME) November 25, 2017

Time’s Ex-managing editor Richard Stengel said: “Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot.”

Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot. But I’m sure you still have that fake TIME cover somewhere in storage. t.co/HkW1XkKxXK

— Richard Stengel (@stengel) November 24, 2017

In June, The Washington Post reported that several of Trump’s clubs display what appears to be a cover from a 2009 issue of Time with Trump himself on the front.

The image, however, is a fake; no such issue of the magazine exists.

Trump was mocked by Andy Murray, who isn’t among the president’s regular critics.

The tennis player adapted the president’s tweet to make it about the BBC’s Sports Personality Of The Year.

Bbc just called to say I was PROBABLY going to be named sports personality of the year but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!

— Andy Murray (@andy_murray) November 24, 2017

Murray isn’t known for tweeting about politics or telling jokes, so the humour was lost on some.

Love the sense of entitlement

— JJ Ryan (@JJRyan64) November 24, 2017

Think you may have missed the joke.

— Joel Gaskell (@joelgaskell) November 24, 2017

Love the sense of entitlement

— JJ Ryan (@JJRyan64) November 24, 2017

Adapting Trump’s tweet became a bit of a thing.

Hollywood just called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named the next James Bond but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!

— David Schneider (@davidschneider) November 24, 2017

Time Magazine called to say that I was DEFINITELY going to be named “Man (Person) of the Year” but I would have to agree to leak major #Ep8 spoilers. I said “no problem”, but then they told me you turned it down and now I don’t want it anymore. Thanks anyway! t.co/0tPGr1cNEM

— @HamillHimself (@HamillHimself) November 25, 2017

Trump may yet be named 2017 Person of the Year – Richard Nixon, Stalin and Deng Xiaoping were all named it twice.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trump-person-of-the-year_uk_5a191bb4e4b0d4906caeee50