Allegations of fraud and forgery took center stage as a trial over Houston’s Equal Rights Ordinance began this week, according to a report from The Houston Chronicle.

After the council approved the ordinance in May, anti-LGBT groups said they turned in more than 30,000 signatures on a petition to repeal it. However, city officials rejected the petition, saying it had only 16,500 valid signatures, fewer than the 17,269 needed to force the City Council to repeal the ordinance or place it on the ballot.

That prompted a lawsuit from opponents of the ordinance, led by former Republican Party Chair Jared Woodfill and Texas Pastor Council Executive Director Dave Welch (above). In court documents, the city has accused the anti-LGBT groups of fraud, forgery and other dishonest tactics in gathering signatures. From the Chronicle: 

Attorneys for the city of Houston signaled in court Tuesday they intend to prove rampant fraud in a petition drive led by opponents of the equal rights ordinance who hope to force a repeal referendum. …

In his opening argument in court Tuesday, Alex Kaplan, an attorney for the city, said the petition is “full of problems.” …

Andy Taylor (right), attorney for the plaintiffs, said any claims of fraud were untrue and the city’s argument is “laughable.” He said “well-intentioned voters from time to time didn’t follow all the rules” but there was no fraud. 

“They’re talking about ticky tacky deficiencies like we’re missing a comma or our signatures are hard to read,” Taylor said. “Give me a break. Did our forefathers die in battle so that commas could prevent their children from voting.” 

Taylor told My Fox Houston that his clients will “fight to the legal death” to repeal the ordinance. And while the trial is focused on technical issues as opposed to the merits of the ordinance, Taylor’s legal representation appears severely tainted by his bigotry. From My Fox Houston: 

“Why in the world would we create a law that confers special rights on men who just want to pretend they are women so they can go into female restrooms in Houston and take advantage of young girls?” asks Taylor. …

Taylor claims this case is going to trial not because of an invalid petition but because Mayor Parker doesn’t want the issue on the ballot.

“She just told her lawyers kill this thing. Smother this thing in the crib because she doesn’t want voters to have a chance to pass on the lunacy of this bathroom ordinance. Well her day off reckoning is about to come,” Taylor says. “We are very confident the jury, after it hears all the evidence, is going to say one thing, mayor you got it wrong. Let the people vote.”

The city’s lead attorney, Geoffrey Harrison, told Click2Houston.com that the people have already voted:

“The people elected Mayor Annise Parker and elected the members of City Council who voted for this ordinance.”

The trial could last two months as jurors go over more than 5,000 pages of signatures to determine how many are valid. 

Watch reports from My Fox Houston and Click2Houston.com, AFTER THE JUMP … 

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

FOX 26 News | MyFoxHouston

BY NATHANIEL ROGERS 

One of the most interesting trends of this year’s Sundance Film Festival is confrontational stories about people being pushed out of or willfully stepping away from their sexual comfort zones. THE DIARY OF A TEENAGER GIRL has earned the best reviews and the most press but let’s discuss two films with more LGBT appeal.  I AM MICHAEL, a drama about religion and homosexuality, and THE D TRAIN, a comedy about a high school reunion, feature grown men whose lives spiral out of control when they stray from their true selves. 

How many gay kids growing up confused about what they were feeling within religious environments used this Bible verse in ways that would horrify fundamentalists?

Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and you shall find; knock, and it shall be opened to you:
-Matthew 7:7 

It’s a lovely sentiment whether you’re religious or not. Everyone needs to know themselves and find their own way. Those who’ve come before us lay down tracks for us to follow but we all still have to choose which to take or construct our own. But Matthew’s promise won’t work for everyone. What if you don’t know what to ask, don’t know what you’re looking for or, like the protagonists of these movies, are totally unsatisfied with the knowledge you already have about your true character?

CONTINUED, AFTER THE JUMP…

In the opening scene of writer/director Justin Kelly’s provocative I AM MICHAEL, Michael Glatze is introduced as an “ex-gay” pastor warning a depressed teenager away from his same-sex desires. And then we’re hurled back some years to meet the same but much different Michael, presumably in order to learn how the one became the other. The eponymous sexually-confused Michael is played by James Franco in a case of so-obvious casting that what else is there to say about it? Once upon a time, as we learn after the opening scene of this true story, Michael was a semi-famous gay activist and successful magazine editor with a happy long term romance with Bennett (Zachary Quinto).

After moving from San Francisco they invite a third, a college kid named Tyler (Teen Wolf‘s Charlie Carver) into their relationship. (FWIW: the much buzzed about three-way sex scene starts hot but doesn’t go anywhere, amounting to an underwear hugging party. Multiple scenes of Quinto and Franco cuddling in bed: much hotter!)

All is not well: Michael becomes less and less happy, has difficulty dealing with his mother’s death, and is plagued with panic attacks. While working on a special religion-themed issue of his gay magazine, he starts furtively reading the Bible and turns away, rather radically, from his own life and gay family. In one uncomfortably amusing scene wherein he hides his Bible like it’s a porno from his boyfriends, he reads another gem from the Gospels: 

He that findeth his life shall lose it; and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
-Matthew 10:39 

Interpret that ouroborus profundity as you will and must. If St. Matthew lived today he’d surely be employed as a horoscope writer because this is just vague enough to mean anything to anyone. Its circular logic is like the crude circle Michael draws to explain to Tyler about the infinite because circles have no beginning or end. Tyler, less concerned with the infinite and more into flirting, teasingly objects, pointing out the beginning and the end of Michael’s line drawing. Michael, considering the infinite all the time, begins to draw spirals instead. Willfully, or stupidly depending on how conscious you think Glatze was when he betrayed his community, Michael spirals out of control bringing still more people into his confused romantic orbit (including Emma Roberts pictured below), hurting everyone in the process. 

I Am Michael has a provocative enough premise that it’s hard not to be thoroughly engaged if you’ve ever struggled with religion, faith, and sexuality. But it’s also too crudely told to totally deliver on the premise. There are thunderingly obvious instances of flashback to illustrate what we’ve just been told (one flashback to his mother is quite tacky). James Franco’s line readings don’t always dispel this weirdly pandering feeling, as he often sounds like he’s talking to a very small child when he’s speaking the movie’s themes aloud.

Though we’re not truly in a “post-gay” world anymore than we’re in a “post-racial” world, we’d probably all do better to acknowledge more fluidity in sexuality and be less judgmental about it. So long as people aren’t hurting anyone, as Michael Glatze does with his “ex-gay” teachings. I Am Michael strains for sympathy with Michael’s confusion but the subtle snark of its ending will appease your inner gay activist all the same. And yet it’s still a somehow unsatisfying movie.  

“Why are you doing this?”

Bennett asks Michael, the former love of his life, as if speaking the audience’s thoughts aloud in scene after scene. No answer ever comes.

THE D TRAIN

The subject of confusing sexual switcheroos also crops up in the far more mainstream comedy THE D TRAIN, starring Jack Black. Black plays Dan, a husband and father who is the self-proclaimed chairman of his high school’s alumni committee and still caught up in being socially accepted by his former classmates. In planning for the 20th reunion, he has the smart idea to convince the former coolest kid in school Oliver (James Marsden, more delicious than ever), who is now an actor, to return and thus lure other people to RSVP.

 
Jack Black basks in James Marsden’s glow in “THE D TRAIN”

While visiting Oliver in Los Angeles, Dan is thrown by his former classmate’s “I don’t like labels” promiscuity: men, women …old high school acquaintances? Dan and Oliver party hard, plans for the reunion are drunkenly made and all sorts of chaos follows: sexual, emotional, social, fiscal, comic, you name it.

The D Train is messy with competing tones and plot threads but messiness is part of its agenda. It’s the story of a man who doesn’t know what hit him when he cares way too much about another man’s favor and affection. Black plays unpopular (for a reason) maybe a little too well. Dan is often hard to like even when Black is landing his punchlines. But the movie belongs to James Marsden’s sexually voracious self-absorbed actor. As with Enchanted, Marsden reminds us yet again that despite his considerable beauty, it’s comedy, not leading man heroism, that is his true big screen calling.  

Nathaniel Rogers would live in the movie theater but for the poor internet reception. He blogs daily at the Film Experience. Follow him on Twitter @nathanielr.