{"id":87160,"date":"2019-05-11T10:25:56","date_gmt":"2019-05-11T14:25:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gayfriendschat.com\/socialblog\/house-republican-wants-the-equality-act-renamed-the-forfeiting-womens-rights-act\/"},"modified":"2019-05-11T10:25:56","modified_gmt":"2019-05-11T14:25:56","slug":"house-republican-wants-the-equality-act-renamed-the-forfeiting-womens-rights-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gayfriendschat.com\/socialblog\/house-republican-wants-the-equality-act-renamed-the-forfeiting-womens-rights-act\/","title":{"rendered":"House Republican Wants the \u2018Equality Act\u2019 Renamed the \u2018Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

House Republican Wants the \u2018Equality Act\u2019 Renamed the \u2018Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ) showed off her anti-trans<\/a> stripes this week, putting forth an amendment (one of many from Republicans) that would rename the Equality Act as the Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act because it includes transgender people.<\/p>\n

The Washington Blade<\/em> reports<\/a>: The distinction for the most condescending and superficial amendment goes to Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.), who proposed an amendment to change the Equality Act to to the \u2018Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act.\u2019 A total of 34 amendments were submitted Friday to the House Rules Committee, which will evaluate the measures during a committee session and determine which are eligible for a vote on the floor. Each of the amendments was posted on the committee website Friday<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Advocate<\/em> adds<\/a>: \u2018In addition to the name change, Lesko submitted an amendment aimed at ensuring that \u201cparents\u2019 custody of their child is not threatened by them simply questioning their child\u2019s gender identity decisions and changes\u201d; one that \u201cclarifies that nothing in this bill can require a place of public accommodation to be required to convert any space separated on the basis of sex<\/a> to a separation on the basis of gender identity\u201d; and another saying \u201cnothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act may be construed to grant or secure any right relating to abortion or the provision or funding thereof.\u201d\u2019<\/p>\n

The Blade<\/em> adds<\/a>: \u201cRepublicans proposed 28 of those amendments, many of which are anti-trans<\/a> in nature or seek to broaden the religious exemption in the bill to allow anti-LGBT discrimination. The remaining six amendments, proposed Democrats, offered tweaks to the legislation, some to the findings section to demonstrate the persistence of anti-LGBT discrimination.\u201d<\/p>\n

The post House Republican Wants the \u2018Equality Act\u2019 Renamed the \u2018Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act\u2019<\/a> appeared first on Towleroad Gay News<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n<\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>\n<\/div>\n

\"\"
\n<\/p>\n

House Republican Wants the ‘Equality Act’ Renamed the ‘Forfeiting Women\u2019s Rights Act’<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n