Category Archives: NEWS

DVD: “Gone Girl,” “Love Is Strange,” “Two Mothers,” & More!

DVD: “Gone Girl,” “Love Is Strange,” “Two Mothers,” & More!

gone-girl-DF-01826cc_rgb.jpg

A couple of Oscar contenders head up the home entertainment line-up this week, including the deliciously wicked Gone Girl (above) and heartfelt gay romance Love Is Strange. Let’s add a German lesbian film, Two Mothers, for good measure, shall we?

Scroll down for the deets!

 

Gone Girl

($39.99 Blu-ray, $29.99 DVD; 20th Century Fox)

David Fincher’s adaptation of Gillian Flynn’s twisty bestseller is deliciously entertaining with Ben Affleck as a guy under suspicion for mudering wife Rosamund Pike. Lots of fantastic supporting turns, including Neil Patrick Harris as a Norman Bates-y stalker ex and Missi Pyle as a Nancy Grace-esque TV personality, contribute to the fun. Extras include a commentary.

 

Love Is Strange

($34.99 Blu-ray, $30.99 DVD; Sony)

John Lithgow and Alfred Molina will move you to laughter and tears in director Ira Sachs’ latest feature, about a longtime gay Manhattan couple forced to live apart when their finances collapse. Hopefully it will receive a couple of Oscar nods — it’s certainly received a lot of awards buzz since its Sundance premiere last January. Extras include a making-of, L.A. Film Festival Q&A session and commentary.

 

Two Mothers

($24.99; TLA)

A married lesbian couple in Germany, Katja and Isabella, discover that the road to having a child together is a bumpier one than expected: the fertility clinic route doesn’t work out due to legal inequities when it comes to gay couples despite their legal bond, and the process of finding a do-it-at-home donor isn’t so easy. Will the cost of this pursuit include their relationship?

 

ALSO OUT:

6270ba5f-f6e6-4f4f-bd0f-d508374e7c19Duane Michals: The Man Who Invented Himself

 

Young Ones

 

The Identical

 

Middle of Nowhere

 

Honeymoon

 

Men, Women & Children

Lawrence Ferber

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/rIZY2rYVtk8/dvd-gone-girl-love-is-strange-two-mothers-more-20150113

First Nighter: Sam Harris' Expertly Baked <i>Ham</i>, Victor L. Cahn's Sly <i>Villainous Company</i>

First Nighter: Sam Harris' Expertly Baked <i>Ham</i>, Victor L. Cahn's Sly <i>Villainous Company</i>
If you were to ask me who the best male pop singer in the country is — not that anyone has — I wouldn’t immediately name bestsellers Michael Bublé or Josh Groban. I wouldn’t say Tony Bennett, who, in his advancing 80s, remains among our most impressive singers. I wouldn’t say the less prominent Michael Feinstein, Kevin Dozier or Philip Officer, all of whom are superb crooners. I wouldn’t say Kurt Elling, whom I classify more readily as a jazz singer.

I would immediately say Sam Harris. I would have said so ever since his 1983 triumph on the first Star Search season.

After seeing Ham, the adaptation of his beautifully written and often humorous memoir Ham: Slices of a Life (Simon & Schuster), at Ars Nova, I’m even more committed to my belief. Throughout the hour-plus turn, directed sleekly by Billy Porter, Harris intersperses songs — many of them abbreviated, which bothered me somewhat — with the story of his life.

A native of small and apparently intolerant Sand Springs, Oklahoma (pop. 6,000) — which, he tells us, has no sands and no springs — Harris recounts the story of a not-always-happy life. He wanted to perform from the time he was 3 but received little encouragement from his kind but perplexed father.

Realizing from an early age that he was different but only later understanding he was gay, he was so disturbed by his inclinations that he attempted suicide at 15. He swallowed a handful of Seconals and was only wrenched from an early demise by a household emergency involving his younger brother.

Nevertheless, Harris remained troubled by his urges well past the early successes — he refers to a “Sam Harris mask” — and was only set wise much later by a concerned Sand Springs psychotherapist. Then Harris reconciled with his nature and was able to engage in a long affair with Danny Jacobsen. They married several years ago and are jointly raising adopted son Cooper. These days they appear to enjoy a happy home life, which may account for Harris’ being less available for tours, et cetera.

While personally distraught, Harris steadily worked at performing and, as he tells it, had his emotional awakening when a teenaged singer friend took him to a black Baptist church. He felt his impulses suddenly liberated and found himself well on his way to becoming the singer he is today.

As he explains this — using a doorway on casters and two chairs as his only props — he makes it clear that what distinguishes him is that he’s staunchly dedicated to “[singing] personal.” This means that whatever he chooses to sing profoundly reflects his instinctive as well as examined history.

Everything he does comes from deep within him. His ability to transmit those impulses explains, certainly to me, his irresistible appeal. The Ham repertoire includes a title song he’s written with musical director and chiming-in sidekick Todd Schroeder, and two other rousing, clever Harris-Schroeder tunes.

He also reprises, by way of a medley, the songs he delivered during his Star Search rise to fame. At the end (and needless to say) he includes “Over the Rainbow,” but trimmed. About that crucial competition-winning rendition he says, “I did everything but tie explosives to my body.” He does sing it again in its entirety later. I won’t reveal the context but will say he uses an entirely different approach.

And it couldn’t be more enchanting. The depth of feeling he brings to it is matched only, in my estimation, by Judy Garland’s introductory Wizard of Oz warbling and represents one end of the wide range along which he sings. Now in his 50s, Harris is fit and as good-looking as ever and exercises masterful control over his voice. Yes, he continues to go for the over-the-top notes and the roof-shaking melismas with which he put himself on the entertainers’ map. That, however, is only one facet of his vocal strategies. As a result, he’s as nuanced a singer as exists these days.

Harris may revel in being a ham, but that’s not the single entrée on his meat-and-potatoes menu. Want to see and hear a top-of-the-line performer who also acts and mimics with ease? Sam’s the man.

* * * * *

When devious ladies get together, how do the power shifts operate? Victor L. Cahn explores the possibilities in Villainous Company, a 90-minute, two-act play at the Clurman that he calls “a caper for three women.” It isn’t much more than a nastily cheerful divertissement, but what’s wrong with a nastily cheerful divertissement every now and then?

Claire (Corey Tazmania) has come in from the rain with a couple of bundles and, she mentions, 41 cents change from her lunch bill. Only seconds later Tracy (Alice Bahlke) arrives with the missing package wrapped in blue paper that Claire has discovered she left behind at the Pyramid Furnishings Company. But she didn’t forget it. Tracy, who packed the intended gifts, deliberately left one out of the bag so she could bring it to Claire.

Tracy, you see, has been watching Claire for some time and suspects — well, knows, really — that Claire is up to no good. Tracy has decided she wants in on a racket she believes is underway that features purloined antiques and their escalating value, which means that having positioned a foot in Claire’s door, she’s going to remain steadfastly inside so as to get the drop on her prey.

She does that until Joanna (Julia Campanelli), a suave type, enters at the end of act one. As act two of the romp is underway, Joanna manages to manipulate the conniving Tracy and gets to thinking she’s achieved her nefarious end. But has she? Tracy has trumped Claire, and Joanna has trumped Tracy, or so it seems. But who will really come out on top at the finish, and what part in all the chicanery does unseen Eleanor play?

Eric Parness directs with quiet menace. The women — at their game of human chess on Jennifer Varbalow’s adequate set and wearing Brooke Cohen’s serviceable clothes — go about their thesping business more than efficiently. Bahlke has as much fun as the smilingly demonic Tracy she’s playing does. Tazmania is enigmatic as the perhaps put-upon, perhaps putting-upon Claire. Campanelli is properly lubricious as Joanna, the sort of ambitious person who’s succeeded at shattering a glass ceiling.

It could be that female patrons will object to a male playwright’s depicting three women as so unpleasantly acquisitive. They might object to a male’ director’s getting to handle the material when a female director could have done well too. But, come on, it’s only a play.

* * * * *

Need help? In the U.S., visit The Trevor Project or call them at 1-866-488-7386. You can also call 1-800-273-8255 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.

www.huffingtonpost.com/david-finkle/first-nighter-sam-harriss_b_6459610.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Why There Should Have Been No Stay in Today's South Dakota Marriage Ruling

Why There Should Have Been No Stay in Today's South Dakota Marriage Ruling

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

HdakotaAs Towleroad reported, we can put South Dakota in the marriage equality win column. The decision, which you can read here, reads like many of the other pro-equality orders from district courts over the last two years:

First, marriage is a fundamental right;

Second, the Supreme Court has said so many times;

Third, that fundamental right has been denied to same-sex couples;

Fourth, the state has no compelling reason to override such a basic and important right in our democracy.

Therefore, the state’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.

Q.E.D.

SchreierWhether U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier (pictured) took the fundamental rights approach above or the equal protection approach some other courts have chosen — gay marriage bans treat same-sex couples differently from opposite-sex couples for no good reason and are, therefore, a violation of the guarantee of equal rights — the result is the same.

The result in the South Dakota case also resembled many of the other district court cases from almost every other state in that implementation of the order was stayed pending appeal.

This used to be standard practice. Judges have been staying their marriage equality rulings since Judge Walker decided that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional back in August, 2010. Back then, it seemed like the safe way to go. We were, after all, breaching new ground.

It no longer makes any sense, not after the Supreme Court refused to grant a stay in Florida pending appeal. As I argued previously, the Court’s refusal to extend the stay beyond January 5, 2015 was special because it was the first time the Court let stand a pro-marriage equality decision in a jurisdiction where the appellate court (11th Circuit, in this case) had not yet spoken. Everywhere else, in South Carolina, for example, or in Idaho, the Court let marriage equality go into effect because the Fourth and Ninth Circuits, respectively, had spoken. 

South Dakota is in the Eighth Circuit, which has not had occasion to decide a marriage equality case in the post-Windsor world. Therefore, with respect to the stay, South Dakota is just like Florida: a state with a pro-equality federal district court decision that should not be stayed even though the superior circuit court has not yet spoken.

It is a shame the stay was put into effect. The judge was probably just being cautious. But her caution extends the hours of discrimination and second-class citizenship for thousands of gay men and women.

***

Follow me on Twitter and on Facebook.

Ari Ezra Waldman is a professor of law and the Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy at New York Law School and is concurrently getting his PhD at Columbia University in New York City. He is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. Ari writes weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.


Ari Ezra Waldman

www.towleroad.com/2015/01/why-there-should-have-been-no-stay-in-south-dakota.html