Category Archives: NEWS

Weekend Movie Review: 'The Avengers: Age of Ultron'

Weekend Movie Review: 'The Avengers: Age of Ultron'

  Ultron25
Chris Hemsworth’s Chest. Its Own Special Effect.

BY NATHANIEL ROGERS 

Movies really ought to be seen (and reviewed for that matter) on their own terms. But what if their very terms are — “it’s all connected!?”

I had the exhaustive if qualified pleasure this week of attending “The Ultimate Marvel Marathon,” in which select theaters across the nation played back-to-back screenings of all 11 of Marvel Studio’s films. Those take you from Iron Man (2008) through to the latest superheroic orgy of mayhem known as The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015). Between the screenings (20-30 minute breaks) were interstitials selling the television program “Marvel’s Agents of SHIELD” that frequently reminded us that it was ‘all connected’.

Does the latest film THE AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON satisfy all on its own? My early guess — only time will tell — is “not so much” but then, is it really intended to? 

MORE AFTER THE JUMP

Avengers-ageof-ultron-trailer-leaks-online-and-its-incredible

Seeing the movies back-to-back threw their problems into sharp relief: the movies are ultimately formulaic, disinterested in women, have weakly conceived villains (an oddity given that good villains are such a comic book staple), and betray an unfortunate tendency to end with a battle in which large inanimate objects frequently collide or crumble, mistaking mass destruction as the highest form of entertainment when the figurative character beats as well as, yes, literal character beatings are nearly always the most pleasurable moments.

Blackwidow-horrorOn the plus side, the marathon was a great reminder of why blockbuster culture has been stampeding all over more intimate cinematic triumphs for a long time now: they feel like “events” even when they aren’t very good. The audience was cheering the arrival of every major character as they returned in Ultron and who wants to miss a party that everyone else will be going to?

The close proximity of the movies also threw hot spotlights onto the films that felt the most complete in and of themselves. They number four if you’re feeling generous: The first and third Iron Man films maybe but definitely both Captain Americas. The First Avenger and Winter Soldier are the jewels of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (by which I do not mean those blueball-inducing infinity stones — Jesus the amount of times these movies tease those stones and that story won’t be over until 2019 after several more movies!!!). The Iron Mans and Captain Americas, despite the fact that they’re enriched by connections to other films, feel more or less like their own movies and not “Previously On” / “To Be Continued” television episodes which won the billion dollar budget lottery. 

Marvel’s super powered stable began getting the live action screen treatment as early as 1977 on television but it wasn’t until 2008 when Marvel began to take back cinematic control of their own characters (the ones they still held the rights to at any rate). Though they’ve been entirely too resistant to evolving (still no female led movies – even though Scarlett Johansson is quite literally more bankable outside this franchise than all of her male co-stars save Robert Downey Jr) they have done a superb job of long-term strategizing and growing ever since. In 2015 Marvel practically owns the world. That’s an ideal deed to own, if you constantly wish to threaten and then rescue that same planet.

Avengers-age-of-ultron-48

Which brings us back around to Ultron, the latest Global Destruction threat. The new film begins before Ultron is born with a hunt for Loki’s powerful scepter, so it’s something of a red herring. Writer/director Joss Whedon worked a miracle with The Avengers (2012) making the first superhero team movie that felt like a team movie (sorry X-Men movies but you don’t cut it because you’re constantly reducing down to Wolverine & Magneto when you have such a lively array of character to work with) so he can jump right in this second time around. There’s no dull ‘getting the band back together’ business so we get to the big ‘Avengers Assemble’ money shot you’ve been seeing in every commercial (above) as fast as a new enemy gets around — which is to say, very fast.

In the fictional city of Sokovia, we meet two mysterious new threats in the shape of twin “enhanced humans”. The Avengers don’t have the advantage of having seen their own trailers and read their own comics so they don’t yet know if the magical Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) or her super-speedster brother Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) are friend or foe or merely misguided Sokovian orphans with unusually sneaky gifts. The Avengers do just fine with this mission except for the part where the twins throw them off their game. Cue: one of the movie’s repeat catch-phrases.

“You didn’t see that coming.”

Avengers-ladies

As with the first team-up movie, the surprises are difficult to find in the A storyline so the joy comes mostly from the best action and acting moments.

Whedon’s best contribution to the Marvel Cinematic Universe has undoubtedly been his two-fold gift for juggling humor with character beats while simultaneously offering up complex team dynamics and real gravitas underneath that thin surface of jokery. His initial claim to fame (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) may have been named after one character but it was a true team series, of dramatic and comic pleasures, from the first episodes. Age of Ultron‘s first act is basically one long doozy of a set piece, which manages to give us time alone with every principle character and give them some connective tissue in battle together, too. There’s even a non-invasive welcome detour by way of a quiet moment between The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) and The Black Widow in which we realize that their relationship is heading away from the platonic and to the romantic. (The Black Widow did not attend the Ultimate Marvel Marathon or she would have seen The Incredible Hulk from 2008 and known that Bruce Banner is too scared to have sex — the rising heart rate, you know.)

The title story only comes to the light in the film’s second act when Iron Man makes a foolishly swift decision about his long-shelved “Ultron program” (essentially peace-keeping robots to guard the earth) which leads to one very pissed off sentient robot, voiced quite memorably by James Spader, who takes his digital beef with Tony Stark out into the real world of flesh and blood. In one of the film’s best scenes he introduces himself to them in lurching incomplete form (made from remnants of an Iron Man form complete with metallic Jack O’ Lantern creepiness). He catches them off guard because they stupidly haven’t realized that they’ve still got an hour of movie to fill. 

From then on though, the movie devolves into an increasingly cluttered mix of globe-hopping action spectacle and occasional quiet moments. Whedon smartly frames the catch-your-breath moments around the most-human and thus the most vulnerable Avengers: The Black Widow and Hawkeye. Hawkeye in particular becomes something of a meta figure, channelng fan disinterest in his least powerful and least popular character into a kind of verbalized self-doubt and purpose-seeking. It’s so on-the-nose that I feared they would give him the super-power of breaking the fourth wall and he’d start speaking directly to anyone he saw yawning in the audience.  The other self-aware business is much more successful. The movie makes great use in particular of Captain America’s old-fashioned qualities for a running gag about his distaste for profanity. 

Chris Evans continues to be adorably innocent sex on a stick and as steely heroic and self-sacrificing as ever. Total husband material. He can even chop firewood if you’ve lost your axe.

Tumblr_ne9p3sm2Kk1r348puo1_500

Fans of the individual heroes will have plenty of amusing beats to look forward to. After the bone crunching vulnerability of Daredevil over on Netflix and Winter Soldier where the blows seemed to actually hurt in all of the action set pieces, much of the action here feels stakes-free. One big slow-mo climactic moment with ALL of the heroes and new characters in frame (that’s a lot of people) obviously intends to be the movie’s biggest money shot (a shout back to that circling camera in Times Square from the first team up?)  but it feels muddy and weightless, an abstract kaleidoscope of shifting colorful costumes rather than an actual brawl with fists, power blasts, kicks, and magical hammers.

Even master jugglers have their limits and Whedon starts dropping balls with this overstuffed movie. Now he’s got twice as many characters as the original film and even more franchise sequels to prime in plot diversions (future Thor and Black Panther movies are the most ill-fitting skin-grafts and the next Avengers the easiest to imagine and most organic). There’s so much of this that Ultron, who initially feels like the best villain Marvel Studios has ever come up with, begins to recede. He’s far more threatening on his own when he looks like a junkyard than when he grows stronger and replicates. How could that happen? In the end his army of selves become suspiciously like body doubles for the anonymous alien villains at the end of The Avengers (2012) – computer-generated images for our heroes to easily rip apart in their world-saving duties. 

This is a shame because with a tighter focus on Ultron and (even better) his counterpart sentient machine The Vision (Hello, Paul Bettany!), who is best left to discover in the movie, this spectacle could have been truly spectacular.

   _1425495089

Nathaniel Rogers would live in the movie theater but for the poor internet reception. He blogs daily at the Film Experience. Follow him on Twitter @nathanielr.


Nathaniel_R

www.towleroad.com/2015/05/the-avengers-age-of-ultron-.html

Flannel Is Not the Enemy

Flannel Is Not the Enemy
In April, a group of students at McGuffey High School in Claysville, Washington County, Pennsylvania organized an “Anti-Gay Day” in response to the National Day of Silence. LGBTQA students in McGuffey’s GSA had organized a local Day of Silence as part of their ongoing work to build safer schools. In photos that went viral, some participating youth wore flannel shirts to promote “Anti-Gay Day” which was a source of some eye rolling and dismay among flannel wearing lesbians (and others.)

As a counter-response, community leaders opted to organize a show of support for LGBTQA youth, using the hashtag #TakeTheHighRoad which is a play on McGuffey’s mascot (a Highlander) and the need to stay focused on what was best for the youth themselves. Flannel shirts were encouraged, but optional.

The youth in Pittsburgh-based queer performing arts group Dreams of Hope took our #TakeTheHighRoad message of support to McGuffey High LGBTQA students a few steps further — producing this lovely video with their own unique messages.

For McGuffey High from Dreams of Hope from First Take on Vimeo.

Kudos to Dreams of Hope for reminding us that flannel is not the enemy and the value of supporting other students.

What can I add to their message? You might still want to post your own photo and make a modest donation to the crowdfund. All funds will be used by the Washington County Gay Straight Alliance (a 501c3) for student programming, including taking the youth to the upcoming queer prom as well as their after school activities. This GSA is a community group that has been on the ground working with McGuffey School District for months. They will be there when the dust settles and the public eye turns elsewhere.

For more information, please visit the Stop The Hate at McGuffey Facebook page.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/sue-kerr/flannel-is-not-the-enemy_b_7190520.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Gay Party Group That Only Charged Over-40 Crowd Says It’s “Deeply Saddened” By Allegations Of Ageism, Denies Everything

Gay Party Group That Only Charged Over-40 Crowd Says It’s “Deeply Saddened” By Allegations Of Ageism, Denies Everything

Screen-Shot-2015-04-23-at-9.47.20-AM-360x222The South Florida chapter of The Impulse Group, a non-profit that “focuses on the sexual and overall health of the gay community” by hosting and promoting swanky shindigs, was recently accused of age discrimination after requiring anyone over the age of 40 to pay a $50 age tax “donation” for entry into a pool party in Miami.

Related: Gay Party Group Accused Of Age Discrimination For Only Charging The Over-40 Crowd

This week, the group issued a defense saying ageism “played absolutely no role” in its decision to charge anyone over 40 a fee to attend the event, then said promoters were “deeply saddened and stunned” by the amount of hatred and vitriol they received, calling attacks against them and their volunteers “unacceptable.”

That’s right. The club promoters, not the people they discriminated against, are the real victims here. And shame on you for accusing them, a non-profit organization, of being ageist when all they’re trying to do is help raise awareness to HIV prevention!

Related: If You’re Over 40 You Should Stay Out Of Gay Bars, Says Ageist Blogger

Unfortunately for The Impulse Group, its plan to shut people up seemed to backfire.

“Why can you not adopt the simplest solution: charge all or charge no one?” one person commented in response. “You have already stated on your website and other places on this very page you are ‘funded by AHF and private donors.’ Therefore, you don’t need an over-40 surcharge.”

In the long term, you cannot alienate the community at large even if it gets you what you want for now,” another person wrote.” Later on you might need us oldies, and you will [have] lost us.”

“There is no real apology, for they continue to state they did nothing wrong,” someone else commented. “Too bad, for any hope they could have had for healing this rift is over. Maybe they should have someone over 40 make the responses.”

Here’s the defense in full:

10854494_809219119163042_5764323281055745810_o-1

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/wxizyg-4ENA/gay-party-group-that-only-charged-over-40-crowd-says-its-deeply-saddened-by-allegations-of-ageism-denies-everything-20150501

WATCH – 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Jar Jar Binks Trailer

WATCH – 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Jar Jar Binks Trailer

Binks

A month late for April Fools pranks, but this parody trailer for Star Wars: The Force Awakens featuring the CGI abomination that is Jar Jar Binks is a pretty clever little joke.

Now if I could just get those horrific images out of my head… 

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP

Binks2

 

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/05/watch-star-wars-the-force-awakens-jar-jar-binks-trailer.html

Don't Just Ask Bruce Jenner for Answers, Ask Yourself

Don't Just Ask Bruce Jenner for Answers, Ask Yourself
Last week Bruce Jenner came out as a transgender woman on the ABC news program 20/20, satisfying many inquiring minds. But more enlightening to me than the answers in that interview were the questions — questions we should be directing more at ourselves than at Jenner.

Interviewer Diane Sawyer accommodated our curiosity about Jenner with her reputed preparedness and warmth. She informed us about the differences between gender and sexuality; drew our attention to the many marginalized transgender and gender non-conforming people among us; and advised us not to assume the pronouns by which any one of us prefers to be identified. (She pointed out that, for the moment, Jenner prefers he/him/his.)

But it was Sawyer’s moments of palpable perplexity that most awakened us to some truly central questions: How do gender identity, orientation and expression effect each of our own lives?

“Help everyone struggling with what this is…” says Sawyer, her eyes squinting searchingly through discomfort. Later in the interview she struggles some more, saying, “Again, it’s the confusion inside this because if you’re assigned male…” Jenner’s eyes flicker with hard-earned wisdom and good humor as he follows her question. “…and you become female…” Sawyer continues to wrestle with the conundrum, her hands rocking from side to side as Jenner nods playfully in unison. Sawyer struggles on, “But you like women…are you a het…erosexual who…” Jenner rescues Sawyer from her confusion with a clear educational answer about the difference between sexuality (“who you are attracted to”) and gender identity (“who you are”).

But the real answer is in his eyes. It is simply, “Yes.” Not “Yes, Diane. You nailed it,” but rather, Yes, this is a truth that cannot be nailed. A truth without definitive answers. A truth that forces us to rock from side to side. Not just Jenner’s truth, but our own.

Do you ever ask yourself what masculine or feminine expressions or mannerisms make you feel most safe, comfortable, authentic, free or good? Do you check in with yourself about what turns you on sexually? Do the answers to any of these questions evoke fear in you? If so, have you asked yourself why?

Bruce Jenner has wrestled with these questions for his entire life, mostly while in the public eye, and this makes him a valuable resource for those who want to better understand how gender and sexuality impact our lives. But we can’t rely on Jenner alone to enlighten us. Sure, we benefit from his story. As Sawyer says, “We think it is a story that can only be told by someone who lived it.” But we also have stories of our own. We must struggle with our own questions — the way Sawyer’s confused hands do at moments in the interview — with our own fears and discomforts, in order to better tell our own stories.

By questioning and shattering the stories that have been imposed on each of us, we allow ourselves the opportunity to reassemble the fragments — as Jenner has done — into a mosaic of our own creation. We give ourselves room to live with freedom, with authenticity and with a sense of integration.

And, at the same time, we also develop greater empathy for those, like Jenner, whose crucial need to live outside the norm is more obvious than most.

The more we understand our own relationships to gender, the less we scapegoat our marginalized sisters and brothers who are targeted, discriminated against and attacked. By better understanding the fears we harbor about gender nonconformity in our own bodies and souls, the better we can answer the question, What is more frightening, the sight of a gender nonconforming person, or getting beaten to death?

Too many transgender people are regularly stigmatized, discriminated against, assaulted and murdered. They need our advocacy, support and protection. But fear of the unknown too often sways our thoughts toward the known instead, toward the majority of cisgender people — those who feel a match between their assigned sex and the gender they feel they are. Too many of us empathize more with the “normals” who get startled, flummoxed or bothered upon spotting transgender folks in restrooms, rather than the transgender persons themselves. (BTW, when trans people enter bathrooms, like you they most likely just want to pee).

The fear of gender nonconformity and the fear of physical attack are not the same thing. You or your child could very well be targeted in a public restroom. But should that occur–and I hope it does not–gender nonconforming clothing and/or behaviors are not likely to be the clues that tip you off to the perpetrator. In fact the opposite is far more likely to be true. (Statistics show that trans people are more likely to be victims of murder and assault than any other minority group.) Knowing the difference between your own fear of gender nonconformity and your own fear of attack will make you better able to protect yourself, your children and also your gender-variant friends and family when any of you are in danger.

An excellent new collaborative performance art project, called Gender/Power, addresses these very issues and assists in exploring them. Led by Maya Ciarrocchi and Kris Grey, the project’s goal is to not only elevate the “experience of being transgender away from medicalization and pathology,” but also to reveal “gender injustice as an insidious cultural condition in need of reformation.”

I attended a performance in March in New York City, and I found it to be revelatory, especially by the way it implicated my fellow audience members and me. As the piece opened, we were escorted into a room with several screens showing images of gender nonconforming bodies standing still. As there was no seating we all stood, squinting through discomfort like Diane Sawyer during the Bruce Jenner interview. But what was making us uncomfortable? The bodies we were watching? Not knowing which of them was female and which male? The stillness? The not knowing what would happen next? As we rocked from side to side in uncertainty, I witnessed men standing defensively with tense (strong?) arms crossed in front of their chest. I saw women fidgeting and rolling their eyes in awkwardness (girliness?). Every one of us clung for dear life to the gender expressions with which we were most familiar — a desperate grasp for control, for security, for an escape from the confusion.

The performers then entered the space and each shared narratives about their own struggles to reconcile gender with their own bodies and souls. Across the performance they seemed to swap narratives, effectively disorienting us but also disarming us, awakening us to the liberating possibilities available to each of us when the rigid walls of “normal,” of binary, of “man” and “woman,” are torn down.

As the piece came to a close, the performers stood in silence once again — this time live, as opposed to on a screen — staring at each of us, forcing us to confront our own genders, bodies and souls, emboldening us with our own questions.

We will all be more enlightened, more aware, less afraid, less on the attack and more prepared for attack, if we direct our questions about gender expression not just to the people who stand out, but also to the bodies we stand in. To ourselves.

*This post first appeared on Mark O’Connell, LCSW’s Psychology Today column, Quite Queerly.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-oconnell-lcsw/dont-just-ask-bruce-jenne_b_7191230.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Andrew “I Don’t Like Mens No More” Caldwell Speaks To Jimmy Kimmel About Having FroYo Thrown In His Face By A Lesbian

Andrew “I Don’t Like Mens No More” Caldwell Speaks To Jimmy Kimmel About Having FroYo Thrown In His Face By A Lesbian

If there’s one thing Andrew “I Don’t Like Mens No More” Caldwell seems to be especially good at, it’s finding creative ways to keep his name in the press.

His most recent stunt involved having a bowl of frozen yogurt thrown in his face by a store employee after allegedly calling her a bitch for not giving him a discount. (Caldwell claims he called her a dog, not a bitch. There’s a difference.)

“The bowl hit me all on my face, on my clothes, on my shoes! Everywhere!” Caldwell told his local news station shortly after the incident.

Related: Andrew “I Don’t Like Mens No More” Caldwell Has A Bowl Of Yogurt Thrown In His Face By Store Employee

Now, the “delivered” former homosexual has gone on Jimmy Kimmel to discuss that terrible day.

Caldwell told Kimmel that he plans on writing a negative Yelp review about the store and is considering suing for “a couple millions” as well.

He also said it was a good thing he didn’t order hot fudge on his frozen yogurt because if he had “my skin would’ve been burnt!”

And as for the possibility of making up and maybe even befriending the cashier, Caldwell said that’s never going to happen, although if she apologized, he would offer his forgiveness, because that’s the Christian thing to do.

“Praise the Lord,” he preached.

Check out the interview below.

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/hxePxuVtlrc/andrew-i-dont-like-mens-no-more-caldwell-speaks-to-jimmy-kimmel-about-having-froyo-thrown-in-his-face-by-a-lesbian-20150501