Category Archives: NEWS

Guernsey County, Ohio Officials Refuse To Marry Any Couples After SCOTUS Ruling: VIDEO

Guernsey County, Ohio Officials Refuse To Marry Any Couples After SCOTUS Ruling: VIDEO

Ohio

Couples in Guernsey County, Ohio will no longer be able to seek civil marriages because the county’s three judges have said they are getting out of the marriage business.

A local mayor, Thomas D. Orr, the mayor of Cambridge, has also said that he will stop performing marriages.

All the officials in question have said this change has nothing to do with gay marriage. However, the timing is suspicious. The news comes shortly after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and at a time when county clerks and judges elsewhere in the US are similarly attempting to get out of the marriage business to avoid having to marry same-sex couples.

The Columbus Dispatch reports:

Contacted by The Dispatch, spokesmen for the four officials did not say that they aren’t doing weddings because they oppose the June 26 U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage. They cited other reasons….

A spokeswoman for Guernsey Probate Judge David B. Bennett [above, 3rd from left] said that he has never performed marriage ceremonies of any kind.

Guernsey Municipal Judge John Mark Nicholson [above left]  hasn’t performed weddings for more than a year, according to his assistant, Katie Archibald. “Our schedule is too busy,” she said.

A spokeswoman for Guernsey Common Pleas Judge David A. Ellwood [above second from left] said he “does not have the jurisdiction to perform wedding ceremonies.”

According to the Ohio Revised Code, county judges who are equivalent to municipal court judges have the power to “solemnize marriages,” but common pleas judges do not.

Cambridge Mayor Orr [above right] is “no longer doing marriages,” said Mary A. Green, his administrative assistant. “It’s been real bothersome to try to fit them in with his schedule.”

The end result appears to be that couples in Guernsey will need to travel to a neighboring county to have a civil marriage. A prospect some couples are not happy about:

1052683-109069Levi Wade, a Cambridge resident, and his partner have the option of being married by a clergy member, but that’s not what they want. They planned a civil ceremony but so far haven’t found anyone in the county to perform their marriage.

“We didn’t want to go to a church. We wanted no religion involved,” Wade said. The couple was issued a marriage license on July 6 by the Guernsey County Probate Court.

“We could go to another county. I think that’s wrong,” Wade said. “This is my home, too. I shouldn’t have to cross multiple jurisdictions to do something that should be available to everybody.”

Watch a news report on what’s going on in Guernsey and an interview with Wade below:

(Photo of Mark Nicholson via The Daily Jeff)

The post Guernsey County, Ohio Officials Refuse To Marry Any Couples After SCOTUS Ruling: VIDEO appeared first on Towleroad.


Sean Mandell

Guernsey County, Ohio Officials Refuse To Marry Any Couples After SCOTUS Ruling: VIDEO

Amy Schumer Wears Princess Leia's Bikini On GQ Cover

Amy Schumer Wears Princess Leia's Bikini On GQ Cover

Amy Schumer is GQ’s August covergirl, dressed up in a “Star Wars” slave Leia bikini costume and sucking some droid finger. Inside, the comedian is posed in bed with C-3PO and R2-D2. We’re pretty sure that never happened in the movie, but what a lucky lady, right?

GQ declared Schumer “the funniest woman in the galaxy” and though we wish we could share some of the presumably funny things she told them in the upcoming interview, the men’s magazine sent out just a press release with the star’s cover photo, and has only published her “Star Wars”-themed photo shoot

Schumer’s interview won’t be released until Monday, according to E! News, so until then we implore you to go see her new movie, “Trainwreck,” opening on Friday, which she wrote and stars in. Also, we’ve already compiled a list of some of the best things Schumer has said, so that should tide you over until GQ releases the article that goes with the titillating photos. 

To subscribe to our HuffPost Entertainment WhatsApp account:

1. Download WhatsApp on your phone.

2. Save this number, 347-334-1794, in your phone’s contacts.

3. Text “POP” to that number via your WhatsApp account.

You can unsubscribe at any time by texting “STOP” to the same number.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/4825a300/sc/14/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C150Camy0Eschumer0Estar0Ewars0Egq0In0I780A220A20Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

Gay rights activist turns Donald Trump into a butt plug

Gay rights activist turns Donald Trump into a butt plug

A straight artist and ally to the LGBTI community has turned Donald Trump into a butt plug over his views on Mexicans.

Fernando Sosa has transformed the Republican presidential candidate, who is opposed to same-sex marriage, into a sex toy using 3D printing technology.

On his website Political Sculptor, they are available for around $30 (€27).

‘I was personally insulted, I came to the US from Mexico when I was 15. He calls Mexicans racists and drug dealers in order to gain followers in the Republican party,’ he told Gay Star News.

Sosa revealed he has contacted Trump’s office to see if they would like one free of charge, but they have yet to get back to him.

‘A lot of people are finding it really hilarious,’ he added to GSN. ‘The Donald Trump supporters really hate it though. I get a lot of hate mail and threats and stuff like that. But regular people, they find it funny. This time Trump will be in an asshole instead of being an asshole.’

He advises people not actually use the product as a butt plug, as it is made from full-color sandstone promising ‘ a coarse finish and a delicate feel’.

While Sosa has been married to a woman for seven years, he feels gay rights are very important.

‘The first one I ever did was Putin, he’s another one like Donald Trump who uses homophobia to gain power. I want to ridicule them both. Every time someone sees their faces, I want them to see the butt plug,’ he said.

‘I am a minority in the United States, and I think minorities should stick together and help each other out. I have a lot of friends who are gay and I don’t think they should be used for political power.’

Trump has yet to comment on the butt plug tribute.

The post Gay rights activist turns Donald Trump into a butt plug appeared first on Gay Star News.

Joe Morgan

www.gaystarnews.com/article/gay-rights-activist-turns-donald-trump-into-a-butt-plug/

WATCH: Tina Fey & Amy Poehler Are “Sisters” Doing It For Their Damn Selves

WATCH: Tina Fey & Amy Poehler Are “Sisters” Doing It For Their Damn Selves

sisters house party

As you know, Amy Poehler and Tina Fey are two of the funniest women, like, ever. And when they’re together, it’s comedic lightening in a hilariously oversized bottle.

leo

The two haven’t starred on the big screen together — barring a priceless cameo in the otherwise cheap Anchorman 2 — since 2008’s Baby Mama, but they’ve reunited for Sisters and boy does it feel good.

sisters underteetsisters apples

The trailer is already funnier than nearly everything I’ve seen this year and features appearances from other funniest lady of all time Maya Rudolph —

sisters thankyou

— as well as Ike Barinholtz playing Amy’s love interest and WWE superstar John Cena flooding my basement.

sisters cena

December 18 can’t come soon enough. Check out the trailer for Sisters below:

Les Fabian Brathwaite — Sisters, and I’m not talking Swoosie Kurtz.

 

Les Fabian Brathwaite

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/JIweEm9-YNU/watch-tina-fey-amy-poehler-are-sisters-doing-it-for-their-damn-selves-20150715

Joey Graceffa on Coming Out: ‘I Want People To Not Feel So Alone’ – WATCH

Joey Graceffa on Coming Out: ‘I Want People To Not Feel So Alone’ – WATCH

Joey Graceffa

Popular YouTuber Joey Graceffa has a new video interview with GLAAD in which he talks about his experience coming out and what he hopes his impact will be on others.

The 24-year-old, who has garnered over 600 million views across his two YouTube channels, came out in May of this year in a music video that told of his own personal struggles, struggles that were also explored more in-depth in his new book, In Real Life: My Journey Through a Pixelated World.

Of his coming out music video titled “Don’t Wait” (which has been viewed more than 8.8 million times), Graceffa told GLAAD:

“Originally I needed something to encompass my book in a video format. So I thought it would be really cool to incorporate three main things in the music video: bullying, dealing with [my mother’s] alcoholism, coming to terms with your sexuality and accepting yourself.”

Graceffa said that people were incredibly loving and supporting upon seeing his video, immediately seeing it as his coming out after many of his fans had wondered for years if he was gay.

Talking about his memoir, Graceffa reflects on the difficulty of reliving his mom’s alcoholism as well as the pains he experienced when he first started dating. Ultimately, the memoir was therapeutic for Graceffa. He hopes it’s a relatable story for his followers, adding, “I just want people to not feel so alone.”

Watch Graceffa talk about coming out below:

 

The post Joey Graceffa on Coming Out: ‘I Want People To Not Feel So Alone’ – WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Sean Mandell

Joey Graceffa on Coming Out: ‘I Want People To Not Feel So Alone’ – WATCH

A Gay Dad Sounds Off On Christians Who Are Reluctant To Attend Gay Weddings

A Gay Dad Sounds Off On Christians Who Are Reluctant To Attend Gay Weddings

On the Friday of the Supreme Court Marriage Equality Ruling, the news hit like a rainbow colored Tsunami. As I woke up that morning, I got a message from my friend Kevin of Stop-Homophobia. As one of my marriage equality heroes, he was the one from whom I would have wanted to hear the news.

“We won.” I could barely breathe.

That day, for me, and many LGBT people I know, was a awash with shock, awe and wonderment. Everything was coming up dancing rainbows.

Waves are only temporary however, and the tide that thrusts them forward, quickly retreats them. That is what happened the next day. Some heads had exploded, and it was not pretty.

I began to realize that many people who had been long silent in this conversation were now engaged. On Friday, it seemed new participants in the debate woke up, the ones who had apparently been in a political issue coma for the past few years. Suddenly the anti-gay discussions were not the same ones we had been arguing about last week. It was like we were starting the conversation all over.

I guess that is to be expected. Patiently, I found myself in the old discussions about polygamy, gay pride parades and “sin.” The feeling of astronomical progress now felt like a reversal into retro thinking. Even if the points were old and worn out, there was something new about the conversations. Rather than exuding homophobia, these seemed to be more from a place of heterosexism. The opponents were not specifically looking to condemn and demean, but only to assert their own “obvious” superiority.

This tone played out in post after post, tweet after tweet, but it really hit home for me when someone sent me an article titled “Would You Attend a Gay Friend’s Wedding?” by Brian Orme. Mr. Orme presented a theory and then invited discussion: “There are two kinds of Christians in the world today—those who would and those who wouldn’t attend a gay friend’s wedding. So who’s right?”

His treatise was basically that, in his experience of Christianity, Christians might choose to love and not focus on judging the sin of the couple, and attend the wedding to which they had been invited. Or they might see their own attendance as an “endorsement of sin” and not attend. So to him, that was the only choice, that, in his words, the Christian guests would either be “humble sinners” or “bold witnesses.”

Nowhere in his discussion does it dawn on him that maybe, just maybe, the invitation to a couple’s wedding, a day they hold incredibly dear, might be… and is, a privilege.

I have officiated for three couples, facilitating their process into deeply felt and precious life commitments. In each case, we told their story of their lives coming together, their commitment, their evolvement into life changing love. In each case they wrote their own vows, showing their mate and all in attendance feelings, thoughts and desires they had revealed to no one before that moment.

These events were life changing, not just for the couples involved, but for the community that surrounded them. I wanted to respond to Mr. Orme’s discussion therefore, with one of my own.

Dear Mr. Orme,

Recently, you wrote a question to your Christian community asking individuals whether or not they would attend a friend’s “gay wedding.” In answering your own question, you state that you would attend. You say “I believe I could attend a gay friend’s wedding without explicitly endorsing the union… It is not to endorse a lifestyle but to love a person in hopes of seeing him or her become a disciple of Jesus. Would this tarnish my reputation? It might, but it’s a decision, I believe, I could make in clear conscience with the Spirit.”

No, Mr. Orme, you would not be tarnished. Upon receiving such an invitation, you should be honored. The couple that invited you did not do so for you to teach anything. They invited you so you could learn about, appreciate and revere the deep and abiding commitment that they feel for each other. They’re inviting you to come experience how they promise to be by each other’s side for life, to help each other grow more deeply than they ever thought possible. They are inviting you to come witness that they would die on the other’s behalf.

With what they are giving to you, if you can only think about yourself, I , if I were in control, would have you just stay home.

You see, the real question that should be asked is: “Should They Invite a Homophobic Judgmental Christian to Their Same Sex Wedding?”

If it were up to me, I would say “no” for all the couples I have married. These couples were stellar, beautiful, vulnerable, strong and inspiring. I would not want your arrogance to blot their light and love in any way.

But. here’s the thing. They, to a couple, would have invited you, even with your superior attitude, and would welcome you with open arms. In their hearts, they would hope that by witnessing their love, your own heart would open up. They would even be willing for that not to happen, just on the off chance that it might.

You see, in that moment of love and joy, they would be better vessels of Christ love than I am.

They are certainly better representatives of love than you are.

One of my fellow gay dads shared this with me. Brian Copeland reported, “I invited a woman who was anti-marriage equality to our 2008 wedding. She came because she loves me. When she returned to her work the following Monday, she told her co-workers about the wedding. She was subjected to the most horrible judgment. They condemned her, and treated her like crap. That completely opened her eyes to how she and others had made me feel throughout the years. From that day she was a changed person, asserting to everyone who would listen ‘You weren’t there to see the love like I was. All I know is that God and love were both in that wedding, and that cannot be wrong.’ She took more away from our wedding than anyone.”

So, if you get that invitation, be grateful that they did not ask MY question, or answer it with MY answer. Most certainly, YOUR question should not even cross your mind. Just check “yes” and notify your “plus one.”

Then go and listen. Go and let the feeling wash over your heart. At some point in that ceremony, God will reach you and have you understand what loving your brother really is all about, that it is not for the couple being married at all. It is for you.

In that moment you will not be humbled or bold.

You will be blessed.

Rob Watson lives in Santa Cruz, California with his family and is a writer for The Next Family and Evol Equals.   

 

More on The Next Family:

 

 

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/4824b9e9/sc/14/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C140Cgay0Emarriage0Earticle0In0I780A14180Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

Advertising, promotion and sponsorship content guidelines

Advertising, promotion and sponsorship content guidelines

We want to help our clients and advertisers as much as possible, but we do ask that all advertising, promotion and sponsorship across our brands is appropriate. We have these rules to allow us to reach the biggest and broadest possible audience in a responsible way and to ensure our valued audience is not unfairly exploited.

The following are general guidelines but we review all direct advertising submissions on a case-by-case basis and reserve the right to accept or reject any content. In relation to programmatic advertising, we use block lists to prevent the publication of advertisements that don’t meet with our guidelines however this is not infallible – if you see an advertisement that seems inappropriate for our site please let us know and we will review.

Our guidelines are as follows:

Laws and standards
Advertising and marketing content must not violate applicable laws, regulations or industry standards.

Hate and violence
We will reject hateful or violent content directed at an individual or group. Our policy is to promote equality worldwide and to work against all bigotry on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, race, sex (gender), creed, national origin, language religious belief, marital or partnership status or age.

Adult, erotic and pornographic content
We do not allow advertisements that contain or promote inappropriate adult content. This may include excessive nudity, sexual terms and/or images of people in positions or activities that are excessively suggestive or sexual, or provocative images. The most common exception is for sexual health products or services, particularly where placing these messages is in the public interest.

Alcohol
We do accept ads for alcohol but the campaigns need to be appropriately age targeted. We prefer ads which urge drinking in moderation only and will reject ads which encourage reckless drinking, particularly if the behaviour may endanger others.

Gambling
Gambling advertising and marketing messages will be reviewed on a case by case basis and must be targeted only at those aged over 18 years old. We obviously welcome content from responsible companies and organizations who wish to help members of our audience recover from gambling addiction or deal with the effects of gambling.

Health
Mental and physical health messages, including those relating to diet and cosmetic treatment, must be realistic and accurate. Claims should be backed up by appropriate scientific information and qualifications and accreditations should come from appropriate organisations.

Weapons
Content must not promote firearms, ammunition or any dangerous or lethal weapons of any kind, including those used for self defence.

Spam and ‘get rich quick’ schemes
Content should not have the potential to unfairly exploit our readers, for example through ‘get rich quick’ or pyramid schemes. It cannot contain or promote ‘spam’.

Subscription services
‘Subscription services’ may include text or phoneline services or anything where a user signs up for product or service with recurring billing.

Pricing and billing information must be clearly stated, as must any action required for a user to qualify for any offer. The information should be displayed in such a way that it is easy to find, read and understand and so it is understood before purchase decisions are made.

Subscription service providers must ensure they are complying with all laws, regulations or industry standards in all territories in which they operate.

Age restrictions
Where age restrictions apply to a product or service, you should alert us to this and should only provide content that targets those products or services to the appropriate age range.

Copyright
You may not use copyrighted content without the copyright holder’s express permission. It is your responsibility to ensure this is done.

Defamation, malicious falsehood and contempt
It is your responsibility to ensure the content you provide is not defamatory, does not constitute a malicious falsehood and is not in contempt of court in any territory in which we publish.

If you have any queries regarding advertising opportunities with Gay Star News, or if you wish to provide feedback regarding any advertising being published on the site, then please get in touch.

The post Advertising, promotion and sponsorship content guidelines appeared first on Gay Star News.

Gareth Johnson

www.gaystarnews.com/article/advertising-promotion-and-sponsorship-content-guidelines/