Category Archives: NEWS

Will Bruce Jenner’s Transition Tarnish Our Golden Transgender Moment?

Will Bruce Jenner’s Transition Tarnish Our Golden Transgender Moment?

Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 10.38.08 AMNote: Per GLAAD, this article uses the name and pronouns Jenner prefers at time of publication. Actually, this article uses no gendered pronouns to demonstrate how easy it is.

This needs to be said first: Anyone who discussed Jenner’s possible transition in the media for any reason before April 24, 2015 is part of the problem. That includes trans people. The “teaching moment” could wait, the scolding of the press could wait. The mocking or slamming of Jenner for how this transition is unfolding on TV could wait. That was all just feeding the trolls, and the trans people doing it were essentially engaging in self-promotion. But now that we have an announcement, let the games begin!

This needs to be said second: Coming out as gay, lesbian, or bi can certainly be stressful and challenging, but transgender people face an extra layer of challenges because we often change our appearance, name and other fundamental ways we interact with others. If a trans person enjoyed any amount of pre-transition notability, the process is even more difficult. Arguably, no one as famous as Jenner has ever announced a gender transition, so there’s intense scrutiny not only from the press, but from the trans community concerned about what effects the announcement and upcoming reality show might have. Any trans people who think they can second-guess what Jenner should or shouldn’t do based on their own transitions under far less famous circumstances don’t know what they’re talking about.

Bruce-Jenner-1How famous is Jenner? Since we live in a society where our collective memory ends at page two of TMZ, and because I was nine years old in 1976, let me try to explain the significance of Jenner for those who aren’t sports fans or ladies of a certain age. America’s bicentennial was an orgiastic celebration of all things America, and it felt needed. We’d just come out of Vietnam. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon for Watergate and was bumbling through the rest of Nixon’s term. Inflation was spiraling out of control, and gay rights was in that hedonistic sweet spot between being de-listed as a mental illness and the onset of the AIDS epidemic.

Jenner became America personified after winning the decathlon at the 1976 Olympics. It’s hard to overstate how that win restored pride in our country that everyone could rally around. Here’s this clean-cut, charismatic, yet humble superstar athlete who embodied everything we wanted to be as a nation.

Jenner’s ascent as a media celebrity came quickly after. Perhaps my favorite was this fabulous turn in the Village People schlockfest Can’t Stop the Music:

However, the late 1970s also ushered in a massive political backlash against transgender people, driven in no small part by the transition of ophthalmologist-turned professional tennis player Reneé Richards. By the time Ronald Reagan’s 1980s were underway, the gay community was in crisis mode, and trans people found it harder and harder to get health services.

jennerJenner is part of what I call the Lost Trans Generation: those who had to endure regressive “gender clinics” that tried to control access to trans health services. These clinics turned away most applicants; the most regressive of these was in Toronto, now called the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. They turned away up to 90 percent of all applicants, allowing them to select for the types they wanted to serve. An entire generation suffered in silence because they lacked the acceptance and resources. Most people who transitioned in the 60s through the 80s disappeared after transition, going “stealth” rather than dealing with the nonsense that out trans people had to endure.

1430136033_bruce-jenner-lgIt wasn’t until the dawn of USENET and later the world wide web that trans people were able to regroup and begin the arduous road toward the level of acceptance we enjoy today. We currently live in an internet bubble of transitions which will not happen again. It’s very similar to the coming out bubble that happened with gays and lesbians earlier. Gay, lesbian, and bi people now routinely come out in middle school or high school, where the median age for transition is still probably somewhere around age 40. That will drop precipitously from here out, but for now we will see more and more folks who put off transition and coming out until it was a little more safe and acceptable.

Trans people have every reason to worry about safety and acceptance, especially famous trans people. The media has a terrible track record with speculating on the transition status of notable figures, and then putting them through the wringer once they transition. They gleefully speculated on Chelsea Manning as the legal case moved to trial, and they continue to use Manning’s transition to score political points. Other lowlights include when Vanity Fair contributor Steve Garbarino badgered The Deer Hunter director Michael Cimino about transition rumors in 2000:

I tell him I have heard that many transsexuals regret it or simply go mad… I say to Cimino, “So you aren’t a pre-op transsexual?” He puts his hands up in disbelief and smiles a rare smile, as if to say, “What did I just tell you?”

Then came the disgraceful 2006 Rolling Stone piece by contributor Peter Wilkinson, speculating on The Matrix co-director Lana Wachowski and publishing rumors so lurid and defamatory that Rolling Stone has sent the piece down the internet memory hole, unavailable on their site.

bruce-jenner_0It’s a pattern familiar to anyone who followed the Jenner speculation this year. The feeding frenzy in the Jenner case was just as repugnant. Everyone was waiting for the one publication willing to cross the line, and when In Touch obliged with their PhotoShopped cover, that was the flimsy excuse everyone else needed to start openly speculating about Jenner. They could claim they were writing about the cover, but they were in fact using that as an excuse to badger everyone who knows Jenner, and even those who don’t, with questions about the rumors behind the cover. All those scumbags should give In Touch a cut of their ad revenue, since they’re all part of the same parasitic swarm.

Each trans person who was a public figure before transition has chipped away at the monolithic idea of what it means to be trans. Entertainers and authors like Chaz Bono, actors like Alexis Arquette, and musicians like Wendy Carlos or Laura Jane Grace have each done a remarkable job of transitioning in the public eye. It’s Jenner’s transition, and we need to respect that. Many people who recently transition and find themselves in the spotlight quickly run afoul of the community because they say or do the “wrong” thing. While it’s true that a public transition carries a certain weight and responsibility, no one is obligated to toe the trans community’s company line on what they can or cannot say. Jenner is in an interesting situation where money and fans are not really an issue, so I imagine we are going to hear some refreshingly candid things that many of us wouldn’t dare to say because of the possible political or financial consequences.

I personally feel the most interesting thing about Jenner’s announcement is that it confirmed the longstanding speculation that our newest trans celebrity is a conservative Republican. Kim Kardashian had outed both parents as such at the 2012 White House Correspondents’ Dinner, but we’d never heard it directly from Jenner until the Diane Sawyer interview.

When gay and lesbian people began coming out as Republicans or conservatives, it was a sign that we had reached a new level of mainstream acceptance. I am delighted that we now have more and more out conservative transgender politicians and celebrities, even if I don’t agree with many of their positions. Pretty much any extended family has a mix of political beliefs and parties, and we need to learn to find common ground regardless of our differences.

Is this media frenzy a good thing or a bad thing? Mostly good, I think. No one person is going to make or break a movement this big. Whatever happens, I didn’t think I could ever be more proud of Jenner than I was when I was nine. I was wrong.

Andrea James is a writer, director, producer and activist based in Los Angeles.

Jeremy Kinser

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/CGzi34o5L3c/will-bruce-jenners-transition-tarnish-our-golden-transgender-moment-20150427

Marco Rubio Tells Christian Broadcasting Network It's 'Absurd' to Think Gays Have Constitutional Right to Marry: VIDEO

Marco Rubio Tells Christian Broadcasting Network It's 'Absurd' to Think Gays Have Constitutional Right to Marry: VIDEO

Rubio

Pandering to the right-wing, religious zealot vote on the Christian Broadcasting Network this weekend, Florida senator and 2016 presidential candidate Marco Rubio dismissed claims that gay people have a constitutional right to marry as “ridiculous and absurd.”

Said Rubio:

It doesn’t exist. There is no federal constitutional right to same sex-marriage. There isn’t such a right. You would have to really have a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. constitution to reach the conclusion that people have a right to marry someone of the same sex. There is no such constitutional right.

Rubio went on to say that marriage equality supporters “ostracize anyone who disagrees with them as haters.”

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP

[h/t Right Wing Watch]

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/04/marco-rubio-tells-christian-broadcasting-network-its-absurd-to-think-gays-have-constitutional-right-.html

Chris Pratt Meets His Match in Ellen's Terrifying New Trailer for 'Jurassic World' – VIDEO

Chris Pratt Meets His Match in Ellen's Terrifying New Trailer for 'Jurassic World' – VIDEO

Pratt1

With her role as The Honker in the upcoming Avengers: Age of Ultron and her exclusive reveal of the extended Star Wars: The Force Awakens trailer last week, Ellen DeGeneres quickly proving she has Hollywood wrapped around her finger.

Her reveal of the alternate trailer for Jurassic World is further proof of this.

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/04/chris-pratt-meets-his-match-in-ellens-terrifying-new-trailer-for-jurassic-world-video.html

The Right Finds A Young Scholar To Peddle All The Same Old Anti-Marriage Arguments

The Right Finds A Young Scholar To Peddle All The Same Old Anti-Marriage Arguments

Anderson_RyanAs the Supreme Court gets ready to hear arguments about marriage equality, the right wing is out in force trying to make its (impossibly feeble) case against it. Chief among its stars is Ryan Anderson, a 33-year-old scholar at the Heritage Foundation, who is putting a pretty new face on the same old ugly arguments.

Anderson is out making the circuit as the “reasonable” voice against marriage equality. His argument, in essence, is that the state’s right to regular marriage is all about protecting the children who are the product of marriage. Those children, of course, are the offspring of a man and a woman only.

Anderson concedes that this may not necessarily be the only argument about marriage and not even necessarily the right one. But he also argues that the Constitution protects states who agree with him. In other words, states can be wrong, but that’s okay because the Constitution allows it.

“We’re having a national conversation about this, and that shouldn’t be short-circuited by the Supreme Court,” Anderson told the Washington Post in a glowing profile.

It’s a breathtaking jump in logic. The role of the Supreme Court is to make sure that wrong arguments about the Constitution aren’t used to protect states from violating people’s rights.

Anderson is using an old, old argument, but because he’s fresh-faced, he’s been getting away with it. It’s the same argument used to pass California’s Proposition 8, and it has the same flaws. Anderson says that state is not in the business of “consenting adult romance.” But the state also doesn’t administer fertility tests to prospective brides and grooms. It doesn’t disallow post-menopausal women to wed.

The protection of children argument applies only to a segment of the population getting married (which inconveniently includes some same-sex couples). The state doesn’t care about all those people not having kids, but it let’s them get married too. The state’s definition of marriage isn’t as narrow as Anderson would like you to think.

Of course, considering where Anderson works, this logic comes as no surprise. The Heritage Foundation was once a legitimate conservative think tank, but since has become a right-wing hack machine. It’s run by Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina Senator who had a long anti-gay record. Instead of trying to come up with new conservative policies, the Foundation is now all about politics. Being a scholar at the Heritage Foundation these days is comparable to being a security guard in the Mafia.

And a little digging into his past would show that Anderson buys into many of the same homophobic arguments that characterize the worst of the right wing. He’s sung the praises of the ex-gay movement, compared homosexuality to alcoholism and claimed that Glee was corrupting American youth.

In the Post profile, he argues that lesbian relationships are short-lived because women leave relationships when their needs aren’t met. (As if it requires two people to leave the relationship, instead of just one.) Gay men are more promiscuous (where have we heard that one?) and marriage equality will pave the way to polygamy.

Anderson says that time may prove him wrong, but that it’s no time to rush the conversation. “I’m inclined not to rush to a conclusion,” he told the Post.  Of course, he’s not inclined to get married yet, either. Anderson is still single.

What surprises Anderson is that people think he’s bigoted. “On the marriage issue, they don’t think you’re just wrong, they think you’re evil,” he told the Post. We’ll leave the judgment to history. That day of judgment is probably a lot closer than Anderson thinks.

Photo credit: Heritage Foundation

JohnGallagher

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/hgYtzc6Y7X0/the-right-finds-a-young-scholar-to-peddle-all-the-same-old-anti-marriage-arguments-20150427

John Oliver Sizes Up the Fashion Industry and the Human Cost of Cheap Clothing: VIDEO

John Oliver Sizes Up the Fashion Industry and the Human Cost of Cheap Clothing: VIDEO

Oliver

Are you loving the current deluge of trendy and inexpensive clothing options at so-called “fast fashion” retailers? Well you might love those perfect spring shorts a little less if you actually thought about how they were made, as Last Week Tonight host John Oliver pointed out on last night’s episode.

“As great as all these stylish cheap clothes are, at a certain point it’s hard not to look at those prices and wonder how does any clothing company make money,” said Oliver. “Although lets be honest, you already know the answer to that.”

Be sure and watch until the end for Oliver’s special surprise for the leaders of clothing companies. 

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP

Oliver2

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/04/john-oliver-sizes-up-the-fashion-industry-and-the-human-cost-of-cheap-clothing-video.html

My "Ferguson Novel"

My "Ferguson Novel"
I once introduced a best-selling thriller writer at a reading here in Michigan and mentioned–among other things–that he was a finalist for some award. When he got to the podium he quipped, “You know what a finalist means, don’t? It means you didn’t win.”

Everyone laughed at his self-deprecating humor. He wasn’t as famous then as he is now. He hadn’t made multi-million dollar deals with his publisher, hadn’t seen movies of his books, and hadn’t become a kind of go-to guy when writers wanted blurbs for their upcoming books.

But despite the joke, being a finalist does means a lot. Given how many books are submitted in any genre for any contest, it means that your book really stood out, really grabbed the judges’ attention. And this year my suspense novel Assault With a Deadly Lie is a finalist for a Midwest Book Award in the Mystery/Thriller category. I’m thrilled, pun intended.

2015-04-27-1430134509-3520336-splashassault.jpg

The book explores the devastating impact on a happy, successful gay couple living in a quiet college town when their lives are savaged by police and they’re subsequently coping with PTSD as well as stalking and much, much, worse without any idea why this is happening to them.

I started the novel five years ago when there wasn’t any national discussion about out-of-control cops, unnecessary SWAT teams, unarmed men being shot dead by cops, tiny Midwestern towns stocking up on armored personnel carriers, and overly-militarized police forces. Now, after 24 books in genres from memoir to historical fiction and beyond, I suddenly find myself having published a book that seems ripped from the headlines.

2015-04-27-1430135609-9851425-swatteam.jpg

I’ve won a number of literary prizes before, including a Lambda Literary Award, and Assault With a Deadly Lie might be passed over for another book. But it was chosen by judges who were obviously not homophobic, for one thing, and willing to pick a book with gay content. More importantly, it was chosen at an important point not just in my career but in our national discussion about police violence. To me, that’s always going to be something to treasure.

Lev Raphael’s Nick Hoffman mystery series and other books can be found at Amazon and Barnes and Noble.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/lev-raphael/my-ferguson-novel_b_7150800.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices