Category Archives: NEWS

Falling Through the Cracks: My Struggle to Survive as a Homeless Youth

Falling Through the Cracks: My Struggle to Survive as a Homeless Youth
2015-04-26-1430081314-2329887-Huffington_edited1.jpg

The sun has only barely begun to peek over the horizon but the faint brightness of the early morning sunrise stirs me in my sleep. I start to wake and for a brief moment I feel almost normal — perhaps even happy — suspended in a blissful state of ignorance as the sleep begins to leave my body and my mind wakes and adjusts to its surroundings.

Almost within the same instant, I am paralyzed, I can’t move or breathe, and an overload of anxiety begins to fill every fiber of my being. Reality sets in and I am suddenly all too aware that I am under a bridge and surrounded by cold concrete ringed with the piercing smells of asphalt and urine.

There were always moments like this, moments where I’d have to remind myself where I was and who I’d become. My mind seemed to be going through this process of rejecting its surroundings — unable to fully accept the present — I would constantly find myself lost in vivid memories of my past as if my psyche was trying to remind me of who I was, and then within the same breath, I’d feel the harsh pangs of depression arise as I remembered my reality.

I was homeless, forgotten, abandoned, and alone. A product of the Texas foster care system, I had no one.

My life was reduced to two pairs of cloths, a well-worn backpack, and the streets. By day, I begged strangers for their change; and by night, I was turning tricks for a place to stay, a shower, a hot meal, or whatever resources I could trade my body for.

That was my reality.

The many years I had spent growing up in foster care took away any chances I had at a normal life. I lived in over 20 different homes — sometimes moving every six to eight months — never staying in one place long enough to create support systems, build community, or establish roots. Sometimes, I think that maybe this was for the better because almost all of the 20-plus homes I lived in were imbued with abuse.

By the time I was 18, I had been raped and beaten more times than I care to remember — often by the very people the state of Texas was paying to “care” for me.

On the streets, I found out very quickly that there aren’t a lot of resources for homeless youth in Houston, especially if you’re gay. I remember once being turned away from the Covenant House — a homeless shelter that caters to youth — after an intake worker determined I was gay and erroneously suggested that I “probably had AIDS” and would be a risk to other youth in the shelter.

So I learned to make due with what I had. Most nights, I would wonder the streets in Montrose until someone picked me up. Sometimes I’d get lucky and they’d let me spend the night, but more often then not, I’d be forced to sleep on the roof of a shopping strip in the north side of Houston — no more than 10 blocks away from the group home I was living at when I aged out of the system and into homelessness.

I spent the next six months on the streets doing this over and over again, living day-to-day, surviving through the street economy — alone, ashamed and guilt-ridden.

One day in August of 2010, I was in downtown Houston searching for an air-conditioned space and a restroom and ended up wondering into the University of Houston-Downtown.

That day, the course of my life changed.

Youth who age out of the foster care system in Texas are eligible to utilize a tuition waiver that covers the complete costs of tuition and fees at state-funded institutions of higher education within the state.

It was on that fateful day in August that I found out about this waiver, and with the help of university staff I registered for classes and applied for financial aid. I spent the majority of my first semester homeless, struggling to keep up with my course work — but eventually, I would receive a refund check for about $2,000 that I used to get my first apartment.

I live in that very same apartment today, and in May of this year, I will graduate from the University of Houston-Downtown with a bachelor’s degree in social work.

My life was, still is, and will always be worth something.

I wasn’t a lost cause, a degenerate, or a waste of space. I was a human being, a person, and a youth, who because of my life’s circumstances ended up on the streets. But with the right opportunity, I was able to surpass those circumstances and accomplish so much in such a short period of time.

I’ve advocated for greater protections for foster youth, testifying countless times before committees in Congress and the Texas legislature. I’ve worked to elect progressives to public office — most recently, working for Senator Wendy Davis’ gubernatorial campaign. I’ve won national leadership awards from the Human Rights Campaign and the National LGBTQ Taskforce, and I’ve even had the chance to intern on Capital Hill for Senator Patty Murray inspiring her introduction of the 2014 Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act.

2015-04-26-1430082261-3668011-1836785_10201130363856116_8504838402045636873_o.jpg

Yes, at one point in my young life I was homeless, but by the grace of God I am now a strong, resilient and intelligent contributing member of my community.

I am worth something — and so is every other homeless youth.

My life is proof that we can change the future of thousands of youth forced into homelessness by simply valuing their lives, making investments into their futures, and recognizing that they are worth more than a few bucks and some leftover lunch.

I share my story to tell you that there is hope, there is life after homelessness, and our lives do matter. We are the future. Invest in us, value us, recognize our worth, and watch us sore to unimaginable heights.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/kristopher-sharp/falling-through-the-cracks-my-struggle-to-survive-as-a-homeless-youth_b_7147872.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Sorry, Christians, GoFundMe Is Cracking Down On Your Hate Campaigns

Sorry, Christians, GoFundMe Is Cracking Down On Your Hate Campaigns

pac_man_by_dani_beloved-d5nqdc1Well, it was fun while it lasted.

An Oregon bakery that was ordered to pay $135,000 after violating the state’s anti-discrimination law for refusing to provide a cake for a gay wedding just had its GoFundMe campaign yanked down.

Whomp, whomp.

Aaron and Melissa Klein, Christian owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, first made headlines back in September 2013 when they denied two lesbians a wedding cake, crowing that homosexuality was an “abomination unto the Lord.” In July 2014 they briefly made headlines again when they began marketing “ex-gay cakes” out of their home.

After seeing the serious paydays enjoyed by an antigay pizzeria in Indiana and a homophobic florist in Washington state, the clever Kleins decided they wanted in on the action. They raised more than $109,000 towards their $135,000 fine before GoFundMe put a stop to the campaign.

In a statement, GoFundMe said that it yanked the page because the campaign violated the policy against raising money “in defense of formal charges of heinous crimes, including violent, hateful, or sexual acts.”

“The money raised thus far will still be made available for withdrawal,” the statement continued. “While a different campaign was recently permitted for a pizzeria in Indiana, no laws were violated and the campaign remained live. However, the subjects of the ‘Support Sweet Cakes By Melissa’ campaign have been formally charged by local authorities and found to be in violation of Oregon state law concerning discriminatory acts. Accordingly, the campaign has been disabled.”

Naturally, the Kleins were not happy about this. They immediately took to Facebook to say this was the work of the devil:

1

We think this Facebook commenter said it best when she replied:

2

Better luck next time, Kleins.

Related stories:

Christian Mechanic Says He Won’t Service Cars That Belong To Gays, GoFundMe Campaign Imminent

These Georgia Florists Owe It To Jesus To Deny Gay People

As Predicted, Antigay Mechanic Says He’s Received Death Threats, Calls For Support From Fellow Christians

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/s1sO4tbnA84/sorry-christians-gofundme-is-cracking-down-on-your-hate-campaigns-20150428

Historic Same-Sex Marriage Case Finally Reaches Supreme Court

Historic Same-Sex Marriage Case Finally Reaches Supreme Court

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is set to hear historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage the law of the land.

The justices are meeting Tuesday to offer the first public indication of where they stand in the dispute over whether states can continue defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, or whether the Constitution gives gay and lesbian couples the right to marry.

The court is hearing extended arguments, scheduled to last 2 ½ hours, which also will explore whether states that do not permit same-sex marriage must nonetheless recognize such unions from elsewhere.

Same-sex couples can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia.

The cases before the court come from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee, four of the 14 remaining states that allow only heterosexual marriage. Those four states had their marriage bans upheld by the federal appeals court in Cincinnati in November. That is the only federal appeals court that has ruled in favor of the states since the Supreme Court in 2013 struck down part of the federal anti-gay marriage law.

Justice Anthony Kennedy has written the court’s three prior gay rights decisions, including the case from two years ago. All eyes will be on Kennedy for any signals that he is prepared to take the final step in granting marriage rights to same-sex couples.

Such an outcome was inconceivable just a few years ago.

The first state to allow gay and lesbian couples to marry was Massachusetts, in 2004. Even as recently as October, barely a third of the states permitted it. Now, same-sex couples can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia, a dramatic change in the law that has been accompanied by an equally fast shift in public opinion.

The main thrust of the states’ case is to reframe the debate.

“This case is not about the best marriage definition. It is about the fundamental question regarding how our democracy resolves such debates about social policy: Who decides, the people of each state or the federal judiciary?” John Bursch, representing Michigan, wrote in his main brief to the court.

Other arguments by the states and more than five-dozen briefs by their defenders warn the justices of harms that could result “if you remove the man-woman definition and replace it with the genderless any-two-persons definition,” said Gene Schaerr, a Washington lawyer.

The push for same-sex marriage comes down to fairness, said Mary Bonauto, who will argue on behalf of the plaintiffs. The people who have brought their cases to the Supreme Court are “real people who are deeply committed to each other. Yet they are foreclosed from making that commitment simply because of who they are,” she told reporters last week.

Arguments made by Bonauto, other lawyers for same-sex couples and more than six-dozen supporting briefs have strong echoes of the 1967 Loving v. Virginia case, in which the Supreme Court struck down state bans on interracial marriage. In that case, the justices were unanimous that those bans violated the constitutional rights of interracial couples.

No one expects unanimity this time. But many believe the justices will take the final step toward what gay rights supporters call marriage equality, in part because they allowed orders in favor of same-sex couples to take effect even as the issue made its way through the federal court system.

That was action through inaction, as other judges played a major role over the years. Only 11 states have granted marriage rights to same-sex couples through the ballot or the legislature. Court rulings are responsible for all the others.

A decision is expected in late June.

___

Follow Mark Sherman on Twitter at www.twitter.com/shermancourt .

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/28/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-arguments_n_7158274.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Same-Sex Couples At Center Of Supreme Court Case Get Ready For Big Day

Same-Sex Couples At Center Of Supreme Court Case Get Ready For Big Day
WASHINGTON — A Supreme Court ruling on marriage equality is still months away, but there was an air of celebration Monday among the advocates, attorneys and couples who have been fighting for decades.

On Tuesday morning, the court’s nine justices will hear arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges, a case expected to settle the question of whether same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marriage.

The dozens of plaintiffs hail from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. Some are fighting to marry their loved ones in their home state. Others want their state to recognize their legal marriage that was performed elsewhere.

On Monday evening, they gathered together in Washington, joined by plaintiffs from cases in other states over the year, to celebrate how far the fight for equality has come.

“Tonight here, we bring together plaintiffs and attorneys from more than 33 states, representing more than 55 different cases, spanning more than 40 years of our movement’s battles in the courts of law and in the court of public opinion, to win the freedom to marry,” said Freedom to Marry founder and president Evan Wolfson, a key architect of the same-sex marriage movement, at a reception his organization hosted for the group.

“We’ve made our case to the country and to the courts, and tonight is for savoring the moment and looking forward in great hope,” Wolfson added.

Watch the plaintiffs get ready for the Supreme Court case above.

White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, a strong advocate of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality, attended the event to celebrate and toast the plaintiffs. President Barack Obama’s administration filed a brief last month with the Supreme Court, making the government’s legal case for striking down same-sex marriage bans nationwide.

“Our true north in the administration is no matter who you are, no matter what zip code you grew up in, no matter what your parents did, no matter what your faith, no matter what your race, no matter what your gender identity, no matter what you believe in or who you love, you ought to be able to have equal opportunity in this country. That’s what we’re fighting for,” said Jarrett, who added that she will be in the courtroom Tuesday for the arguments, to attendees.

“We feel very strongly the law is on our side, and so we’re hopeful that the court will follow the law,” she told The Huffington Post after her speech.

White House Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett and Freedom to Marry Founder Evan Wolfson at the plaintiff reception.

White House Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett and Freedom to Marry Founder Evan Wolfson at the plaintiff reception.

The plaintiffs from the four states in Obergefell will be in the courtroom Tuesday morning to hear the oral arguments, joining the crowd on the steps of the Supreme Court afterward. Many of the plaintiffs used the words “excited” and “overwhelmed” and “whirlwind” when talking about their experience in Washington, D.C. thus far.

Kentucky plaintiffs Michael DeLeon and Greg Bourke, with their children Isaiah and Bella.

Kentucky plaintiffs Michael DeLeon and Greg Bourke, with their children Isaiah and Bella.

“It’s nice to come and see the city, but to come here and actually be part of trying to change the world…and make it a better place is what’s so exciting to us,” said Kentucky resident Tim Love, who has been with his partner, Lawrence Ysunza, for nearly 35 years and is fighting to get married in their home state.

“We’re nervous with all the excitement, but it’s a good, positive nervousness. Mainly we’re excited,” said Kim Franklin, another Kentucky plaintiff who wants the state to recognize her marriage to Tammy Boyd, the woman she married in 2010 in Connecticut.

“Our kids and grandkids kind of brought it home to us because they made the comment that when the next history books come out, you guys are going to be in them,” she added. “And that was an amazing thing, because from our child and our grandchildren’s standpoint, they don’t think about it anything other than we love each other. … But the fact that they knew it was such a big deal that it was going to be in the history books, we started saying, ‘It’s true. It’s going to be a big deal.'”

Kim Franklin showing off the shirt the Kentucky plaintiffs wore Monday.

Kim Franklin showing off the shirt the Kentucky plaintiffs wore Monday.

Kentucky plaintiffs Kim Franklin and Tammy Boyd.

Kentucky plaintiffs Kim Franklin and Tammy Boyd.

Another highlight for the plaintiffs Monday was going to the Supreme Court and meeting with the supporters who have been camped out for days, braving the rain and sleeping on the cold concrete, in order to secure tickets to see the oral arguments.

“People have been great. Just the fact that they’re staying out there, and they’re still out there right now — gosh, I could not do it,” said Tevin Johnson-Campion, 20, whose dads are two of the Kentucky plaintiffs. He’s been blogging about his trip to Washington with his family.

When the families then gathered together for a photo on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday, getting the group situated and facing the camera took some time. The strong emotions of the week came to the forefront when photographers implored everyone to smile for the camera.

“It’s hard to smile,” said Kentucky plaintiff Luke Barlowe, “when you’re crying.”

Kentucky plaintiffs Jimmy Meade and Luke Barlowe, who met in 1968 and have been married since 2009.

Kentucky plaintiffs Jimmy Meade and Luke Barlowe, who met in 1968 and have been married since 2009.

The plaintiffs in Obergefell v. Hodges.

The plaintiffs in Obergefell v. Hodges.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/27/valerie-jarrett-marriage-equality_n_7156960.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

LGBTQ Immigrants On Same-Sex Marriage: 'History Went Along With Us'

LGBTQ Immigrants On Same-Sex Marriage: 'History Went Along With Us'
WASHINGTON — Same-sex marriage arguments before the Supreme Court on Tuesday stem partly from a dispute over a few words on a piece of paper.

Jim Obergefell, one of the lead plaintiffs, wanted to be listed as the surviving spouse on the death certificate of his late husband, John Arthur. Because they live in Ohio, where their marriage is not recognized, the question of whether Obergefell should be allowed to do so has made it to the Supreme Court.

Isabel Sousa-Rodriguez, 25, understands Obergefell’s desire to ensure his spouse’s death certificate reflects the existence of their marriage. Isabel, who identifies as genderqueer and who prefers the use of “Isabel” rather than a male or female pronoun, is married to Felipe Sousa-Rodriguez, 29, an activist who will speak at a rally outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

In 2013, Isabel and Felipe — who both were once undocumented — had been married for about a year when Isabel applied for citizenship. At the citizenship interview, Isabel filled out the forms as a married person. The agent apologized, but said he had to change the form back to single, because Isabel’s same-sex marriage wasn’t recognized by the federal government.

The next day, the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, the law that kept the federal government from recognizing marriages like the Sousa-Rodriguez’s.

Isabel went to be sworn in as a U.S. citizen later, and received a naturalization certificate. It said “married” — Isabel said the agent must have gone back to change it in light of the Supreme Court decision. It was an emotional day for a lot of reasons, but Isabel said just seeing that word was the biggest one.

Reading about Jim Obergefell and John Arthur reminded Isabel of how that felt.

“It just struck a chord for me because I remember that feeling at the courthouse and just how desperately I didn’t want it to say I was single because it was a lie and I didn’t want to be living a lie,” Isabel said. “Having that recognition, I know how badly Jim wanted and continues to want that to be the case in his fight at the Supreme Court, so I feel so connected to him in that sense.”

Isabel and Felipe are among the estimated 900,000 LGBT immigrants living in the U.S., including about 267,000 who are undocumented, according to a 2013 report from the Williams Institute at UCLA Law.

Isabel and Felipe met in Miami in 2007, when they started immigration activism with the group Students Working For Equal Rights. Felipe was born in Brazil and had been living in the U.S. without status since he was 14. Isabel was originally from Colombia and was undocumented until being granted a green card through Isabel’s stepmother.

Isabel and Felipe were friends at first, but their “activist love,” as Felipe called it, grew quickly. A few months after they started dating in 2008, they moved in together. Felipe came out twice — first as an undocumented immigrant, then as a gay man.

They were active in immigrant rights issues, and walked with two other activists from Miami to Washington in 2010.

In 2011, when Isabel proposed, it came after a walk around Charleston, South Carolina, that ended on the steps of a Department of Homeland Security building, and a discussion about the injustices that had transpired there.

“The only thing that we really promised each other was always to fight for justice and do it together,” Felipe said. “That was really our number one promise to each other when we first started dating.”

They were married in Florida on May 18, 2012, but it wasn’t recognized by the state, so they traveled to Massachusetts the next day, waited the state-required number of days, and were legally married. Felipe said they were unsure what it would mean for his immigration status, but they didn’t think it would be a factor.

But it eventually did matter. He received work authorization and temporary reprieve through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, or DACA, in 2012, but was still undocumented. When DOMA was struck down, Isabel was finally able to petition for legal permanent residency for Felipe. He got his green card in December.

“We didn’t [get married], thinking about how there is this potential benefit of not having to face deportation if I had a permanent status,” Felipe said. “It was not in the plans, it just happened like that. History went along with us.”

They now live in New York, where Isabel is set to begin a PhD program in sociology at CUNY in the fall and Felipe works with the immigrant advocacy group United We Dream. Eventually, they hope to move back to Florida and adopt children. They also want to keep advocating for better treatment of immigrants and LGBTQ people.

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage, Felipe said it will be bittersweet, since other courts have held up President Barack Obama’s deportation executive actions that would help many undocumented immigrants.

“What I hope is that allies of LGBTQ people and also LGBTQ people in general can see that immigrants are still struggling,” he said. “Through the same pathway that we found rights, they also have taken away rights from folks. This is a moment for the coalition to be coalescing.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/27/immigration-gay-marriage-supreme-court_n_7156048.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

NYC's Gay-Owned 'OUT Hotel' Faces Wrath of Protesters Angry Over Reception for Ted Cruz: VIDEO

NYC's Gay-Owned 'OUT Hotel' Faces Wrath of Protesters Angry Over Reception for Ted Cruz: VIDEO

Outnyc

A large crowd of protesters demonstrated outside The Out NYC Hotel on 42nd Street this evening, angry at the intimate reception its owners, Ian Reisner and Mati Weiderpass, held at their home last Wednesday for anti-gay conservative and presidential hopeful Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX).

The protesters yelled “shame” and read off a list of other properties included in a boycott, including those recently purchased by Reisner in the business district of the gay resort Fire Island Pines.

The protest was recorded on a series of Vines by DNAinfo reporter Danielle Tcholakian.

Watch all the Vines, AFTER THE JUMP

After initially defending the reception, Reisner and Weiderpass apologized on Facebook.

Said Reisner, feeling the backlash: “I am shaken to my bones by the e-mails, texts, postings and phone calls of the past few days. I made a terrible mistake.”

Added Weiderpass: “I share in Ian’s remorse. I, too, lay humbled with what has happened in the last week. I made a terrible mistake.”

Since the reception, several gay organizations and individuals have pulled out of events scheduled at the Out NYC hotel.

In a statement following the reception, Cruz issued a statement apparently meant to appease conservatives which said, “The purpose of the meeting and the primary topics of conversation were national security, foreign policy, and America’s commitment to standing with Israel. On the subject of marriage, when asked, I stated directly and unambiguously what everyone in the room already knew, that I oppose gay marriage and I support traditional marriage.”

Cruz continued his anti-gay crusade at an event in Iowa over the weekend, where he urged Republicans to “fall to our knees in prayer” that the Supreme Court does not rule for marriage equality.

Protest


Andy Towle

www.towleroad.com/2015/04/outprotest.html