They challenged discrimination at Georgetown: 1980

They challenged discrimination at Georgetown: 1980

Washington Area Spark posted a photo:

They challenged discrimination at Georgetown: 1980

A group of gay Georgetown University students filed suit against the university and its law department April 30, 1980 charging the school “created a chilling effect upon the speech and association rights” of gay students by denying charters to their organizations.

Some of those involved in the suit are (from left to right): James J. Ryan, student; Clint Hockenberry, student; Ronald Bogard, attorney; and Laura J. Rayburn, adjunct law professor.

Two student groups: The Gay People of Georgetown University and the Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center were both denied charters by the school, despite being approved by the student government in the former case and the student-faculty governing body in the latter case.

The suit relied on the city’s 1977 Human Rights law.

The suit worked its way through the courts until the full U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in November 1987 that the University did not have to officially recognize the groups, but could not deny them funds.

A settlement in the case followed where it was agreed that Georgetown would fund the groups, but not recognize them and that the groups could not hold events on campus where the majority of participants were non students.

The court decision and settlement caused a riff within the Catholic community that led to Sen. William Armstrong (R-Col.) offering an amendment to cut off city funding if D.C. didn’t change its Human Rights law.

The amendment passed, but was struck down by the courts.

Armstrong then offered another amendment—directly modifying the city’s laws that passed both houses of Congress.

The law permitted religiously-affiliated institutions to refuse to recognize gay student groups.

Gay legal rights continue to be under attack with the U.S. Supreme Court rulings that religious objections must be taken into account. A pending case will determine whether LGBTQ people fall under 1964 federal civil rights act prohibiting discrimination.

For more information and related images, see flic.kr/s/aHskcVHcxD

Photo by Brig Cabe. The image is courtesy of the D.C. Public Library Washington Star Collection © Washington Post.

They challenged discrimination at Georgetown: 1980

Teens having sex school bathroom Switching Up Sexy Stepassociate’s sister

Teens having sex school bathroom Switching Up Sexy Stepassociate’s sister


Duration: 08:00

Keywords: hardcore,doggy style,Danni Rivers,threesome,3some,teen sex,taboo,Dustin Daring,brunettes,small tits,blowjob,deep throat,young,hot,sexy,teens,petite,

www.tube8.com/threesome/teens-having-sex-school-bathroom-switching-up-sexy-stepassociates-sister/60303811/

A woman had died from a ‘gender reveal party’ explosion. Let that sink in.

A woman had died from a ‘gender reveal party’ explosion. Let that sink in.

As if we needed one more reason to put ‘gender reveal parties’ to rest for good, just add “deadly” to the list.

An Iowa woman has died following an explosion that took place as part of a ‘gender reveal’ stunt, reports KDVR News.

Medical responders pronounced the 56-year-old dead at the scene, according to a police press release.

Further details remain sparse, except that the woman was struck by debris from the gender reveal explosion.

Gender reveal parties, in which expecting couples gather friends and family to announce the gender of their unborn baby in some sort of dramatic reveal of either pink (for girls) and blue (for boys), have grown in popularity in recent years.

And along the way, the ‘reveals’ have become ever more elaborate, and occasionally dangerous.

One reveal in 2017 started a wildfire that burned across nearly 47,000 acres and caused $8 million in damage.

Jenna Karvunidis, the woman credited with inventing the idea, which was then popularized when a blog post she wrote about it was picked up by a Chicago magazine, has called the current situation “a bit of a nightmare.”

In fact, she’s had a full change of heart on gender itself after her child — yes, the one she announced the gender of in the original ‘gender reveal party’ — opened her mind to the idea that gender isn’t a binary.

A weird thing came up on Twitter, so I figured I’d share here. Someone remembered it was me who “invented” the gender…

Posted by High Gloss And Sauce on Thursday, July 25, 2019

“Plot twist!” she wrote in a Facebook post that went viral. “The baby from the original gender reveal party is a girl who wears suits,” Karvunidis says. “She says ‘she’ and ‘her’ and all of that, but you know she really goes outside gender norms.”

“She’s telling me ‘Mom, there are many genders. Mom, there’s many different sexualities and all different types,’ and I take her lead on that,” she wrote.

www.queerty.com/woman-died-gender-reveal-party-explosion-let-sink-20191028?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Nate Silver Blasted After Scolding ‘Libs’ for Not Allowing Trump to Have ‘One Good Day’

Nate Silver Blasted After Scolding ‘Libs’ for Not Allowing Trump to Have ‘One Good Day’

Election statistician and prognosticator Nate Silver trended on Twitter Monday after complaining that “Libs” should let Donald Trump have at least “one good day.”

It really amazing how many Libs can’t even permit Trump to have *one good day* (nobody will remember this stuff by Tuesday) after US forces kill perhaps the world’s most wanted terrorist.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) October 27, 2019

Tweeted Silver: “It really amazing how many Libs can’t even permit Trump to have *one good day* (nobody will remember this stuff by Tuesday) after US forces kill perhaps the world’s most wanted terrorist.”

Silver’s words weren’t welcomed:

I thought I’d wake up to a great day. Instead, I see @JoeNBC defending the white supremacist president, @facebook letting Ben Shapiro do what I was kicked off for doing, and Nate Silver lecturing us that we should let Trump have one good day.

Common theme: Privileged white men.

— Kimberley Johnson (@AuthorKimberley) October 28, 2019

Nate Silver’s trajectory from Stats Wunderkind to sneering memelord perfectly captures the libidinal dynamics of technocratic malice in the era of neoliberal decline don’t @ me

— Patrick Blanchfield (@PatBlanchfield) October 28, 2019

Yep, the “Libs” aren’t being fair to the guy who’s holding kids in cages, keeps conspiring with foreign nations against the U.S., is running sham criminal prosecutions of his enemies, and has sexually assaulted dozens of women. My statistical model says Nate Silver is unfollowed. t.co/IBfbO8To3b

— Palmer Report (@PalmerReport) October 28, 2019

Another great side effect of the chant. It triggered idiots like Nate Silver and expose their bias not by opposing the chant itself but by their use of trigger words like “libs”. Nobody cool uses that term to refer to liberals and worse yet it wasn’t just liberals booing. t.co/jrOntNMzvE

— Jon Royce (@zakkscoffee) October 28, 2019

nate silver is a walking pancreatic tumor. pic.twitter.com/Q2b6HMlH2f

— Badass Wolf Tiger Leather Bracelet (@larsloving) October 28, 2019

Nate Silver begging for him to get “one good day” is like asking me to have sympathy for a guy who broke in my house and pissed on my floor. t.co/8w2kl9wOOL

— Dave Schilling (@dave_schilling) October 28, 2019

Good to know who Nate Silver really is. t.co/Bdx4K577EI

— Adam Parkhomenko (@AdamParkhomenko) October 28, 2019

Nate Silver is getting ratioed into oblivion because of this tweet. Remember when many (including me) regarded him as the go-to regarding political polling? Thoughts and prayers or whatever. pic.twitter.com/4W3psyWbZf

— April (@ReignOfApril) October 28, 2019

The post Nate Silver Blasted After Scolding ‘Libs’ for Not Allowing Trump to Have ‘One Good Day’ appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.


Nate Silver Blasted After Scolding ‘Libs’ for Not Allowing Trump to Have ‘One Good Day’