Gay Man a Favorite To Become Ireland’s Next Prime Minister

Gay Man a Favorite To Become Ireland’s Next Prime Minister

Leo Varadkar

According to polls released yesterday, there is a strong likelihood that Leo Varadkar (above) will become Ireland’s first openly gay Taoiseach (Prime Minister).

Currently serving as Minister for Social Protection in Taoiseach Enda Kenny’s increasingly unpopular government, Varadkar is seen by many as a frontrunner in the current leadership race along with Simon Coveney.

Leo Varadkar is the people’s favourite for next Fine Gael leader t.co/kumC5D8QAz pic.twitter.com/ZL4EWXffAe

— MSN Ireland (@msnireland) February 21, 2017

In one poll released yesterday, 35 percent of respondents said they would prefer Varadkar as the next leader of the Fine Gael party while 23 percent opted for Coveney. However, another poll showed Coveney with 40 percent of the vote with Varadkar trailing on 33 percent.

RELATED: Ireland’s First Openly Gay Minister Blasts Mike Pence: ‘I Don’t Like What He Stands For’

Varadkar and Coveney will meet Kenny today for the first time since both lawmakers commented on his leadership, reports RTE.

Kenny has been urged to ensure he “settle the matter” quickly. It is thought the deeply unpopular Taoiseach will resign on his return from Washington, D.C. where he will present Donald Trump with the traditional St. Patrick’s Day bowl of shamrock.

The post Gay Man a Favorite To Become Ireland’s Next Prime Minister appeared first on Towleroad.


Gay Man a Favorite To Become Ireland’s Next Prime Minister

Guess what Dear Abby thinks you should do with your antigay wedding guests

Guess what Dear Abby thinks you should do with your antigay wedding guests

Should guests who are known to be antigay be allowed at your wedding anyway?

That’s the quandary pitched to Dear Abby in a letter from a worried bride who doesn’t know what to do about a somewhat sticky situation.

Related: Dear Abby Comforts Lesbian Grannie With Jerk Son

It’s led to a very memorable answer.

“My fiancé and I are getting married in a year,” writes Bride For Marriage Equality: “MThe question from “Bride for Marriage Equality”:

We have some very close gay friends, and I have gay family members on my mom’s side. The majority of our family is gay-friendly, but a few of them on my father’s side are very open about their dislike of the LGBT community.

Our ceremony will be at a Unitarian Universalist church because we love that they are supportive of the LGBT community and want everyone to feel comfortable and accepted on our big day. I’m terrified that my family members will do or say something to hurt or offend guests at our wedding who have same-sex partners.

I am considering putting a note on my wedding website that our wedding will be a celebration of love, and to please set aside political and personal beliefs and accept every one of our guests during this happy occasion.

Would this be appropriate? I don’t know how else to convey the message that we will not tolerate any hateful or offensive remarks or actions against our loved ones.

Abby, much to her credit, is having none of it:

“Do not post that message on your website,” she writes.

Your message should be delivered via a telephone conversation with the people you think may have a problem. A way to phrase it would be to tell them you are planning your wedding and that some of the guests in attendance will be same-sex couples.

Ask if this would make them uncomfortable, and if the answer is yes, do not invite them.

Of course, she could print out copies of the column and include one with every invite. That would also get the message across.

 

 

www.queerty.com/guess-dear-abby-thinks-antigay-wedding-guests-20170221?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Julian Assange Defends Milo Yiannopoulos as Breitbart Mulls Dismissal

Julian Assange Defends Milo Yiannopoulos as Breitbart Mulls Dismissal

Milo Yiannopoulos

Julian Assange, still holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London while avoiding extradition to Sweden on rape charges, defended man-boy love enthusiast Milo Yiannopoulos on Monday night.

Yiannopoulos was disinvited to CPAC and dropped by Simon & Schuster over the weekend after remarks surfaced in which he said he was comfortable with men having sex with boys as young as 13.

Tweeted Assange: “US ‘liberals’ today celebrate the censorship of right-wing UK provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos over teen sex quote.”

US ‘liberals’ today celebrate the censorship of right-wing UK provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos over teen sex quote.t.co/bz6dH0jyhk

— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) February 21, 2017

He added: “Issue is ‘liberals’ cheering on a clearly illiberal act — book censorship — for political reasons with morality as cover.”

.@nycjaneyvee Issue is ‘liberals’ cheering on a clearly illiberal act — book censorship — for political reasons with morality as cover.

— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) February 21, 2017

Yiannopoulos is holding a press conference at 3 pm today in New York City.

Breitbart EIC: “Milo is going to have a press conference later today and he is going to talk about his future with Breitbart”

— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) February 21, 2017

Meanwhile, Breitbart employees are reportedly threatening to walk if Milo isn’t fired:

scoop: Breitbart senior editor tells me at least half a dozen employees ready to walk out if Milo is not fired. pic.twitter.com/k5wZ3OGTlL

— Elaina Plott (@elainaplott) February 20, 2017

The Washington Post adds:

By late Monday afternoon, there were ongoing discussions at Breitbart about Yiannopoulos’s future at the company, according to two people familiar with the organization who were not authorized to speak. Inside the newsroom, several staffers made clear to senior leadership that they felt uncomfortable and may decide to leave if he stays, the people said.

The post Julian Assange Defends Milo Yiannopoulos as Breitbart Mulls Dismissal appeared first on Towleroad.


Julian Assange Defends Milo Yiannopoulos as Breitbart Mulls Dismissal

HRC Calls for Continued Engagement at the UN Human Rights Council

HRC Calls for Continued Engagement at the UN Human Rights Council

As the new U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson took office earlier this month, HRC joined a group of human rights organizations in urging Tillerson and his staff to continue U.S. engagement with the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The UN Human Rights Council, established in 2006, has in recent years taken up an increasing number of initiatives aimed at protecting the human rights of LGBTQ people.

  • In 2011, the Council passed a South African resolution requesting the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights report on “discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity.” This was the first time a UN body had approved a resolution containing language that affirmed the human rights of LGBTQ specifically.
  • In 2014, the Council passed a similar resolution, this time led by Latin American countries.
  • Member countries of the Council have also raised LGBTQ concerns with a number of countries during their Universal Periodic Review process, in which each country is subjected to a review of their own human rights practices and laws.
  • In 2016, the Council agreed to appoint an Independent Expert to focus on the human rights of LGBTQ people, the first ever such position to deal with LGBTQ issues created at the UN. The new expert will assess the state of LGBTQ human rights, liaise with LGBTQ advocates and allies around the world and engage with governments and civil society to make recommendations for combating violence and discrimination against LGBTQ people.

With that in mind, on February 9, HRC joined a letter to Secretary Tillerson that urges him to maintain U.S. engagement with the Council.

“Strong American leadership at the Council has advanced our nation’s interests and values on a range of human rights priorities,” the letter reads. “The Council is the only global intergovernmental body addressing some of the most pressing human rights challenges of our time. Its importance is recognized by America’s friends and allies, human rights defenders—particularly those operating under repressive regimes.”

The letter also warns Secretary Tillerson about how the Council might change without U.S. leadership: “Disengagement from the Council would leave a vacuum, and states that do not share our nation’s interests and values would fill it, resulting in less condemnation of the world’s worst human rights abusers…and more repressive governments gaining membership in the Council. None of these outcomes serves America’s interests.”

The letter was signed by the Better World Campaign, Freedom Now, Freedom House, Human Rights First, the Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights, and the UN Association of the USA and the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.

www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-calls-for-continued-engagement-at-the-un-human-rights-council?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Donald Trump has single-handedly brought the religious right back from the dead

Donald Trump has single-handedly brought the religious right back from the dead

As the Trump administration continues to rack up outrage upon outrage, it’s easy to lose sight of the long-term implications of his presidency. A lot of attention has been paid to Trump’s debt to conservative evangelicals, such as Jerry Falwell Jr., especially those leaders who stood by him at the low points in his campaign.

But it’s worth noting that if the religious right is riding high now under Trump, had he lost, the group would have been in complete disarray. There was a bitter split among leaders about Trump’s fitness for the presidency. Moreover, throughout the campaign, there was clear signs that conservative evangelical leaders were divided not just about Trump but about their role in politics and in particular the merits of replaying the culture wars. If Trump had lost, there would have been a struggle over direction comparable to the debate that progressives are now facing.

Of course (and to our great misfortune), Trump didn’t lose. Instead of struggling with their waning influence, the religious right is poised to wield unprecedented power in government and policy. While Trump couldn’t tell the difference between a communion wafer and a Triscuit, he does recognize loyalty and rewards it.

Here are six ways that Trump has made a downpayment to the religious right for their support…

1. Neil Gorsuch

The choice of Gorsuch as Trump’s Supreme Court nominee has evangelical leaders doing cartwheels, even if they grumbled when the story that he congratulated a friend on his same sex wedding. The idea of stealing a seat from Obama and ensuring that the Court still tilted to the right was the reason why many evangelicals stood by Trump. If the Senate approves his nomination, Gorsuch, 51, will be the gift that keeps on giving for decades to come.

2. Cabinet choices

There’s no unifying thread among Trump’s Cabinet members, but a large subgroup have close ties to the religious right. Betty DeVos has given buckets of money to antigay causes. Rick Perry ran a 2012 presidential campaign steeped in homophobia. Ben Carson launched his political career by trashing gays. Jeff Sessions is reflexively homophobic.  And that’s just a few members of the Cabinet. There are plenty more, to say nothing of the country’s first religious right Vice President Mike Pence.

3. His other appointees

Trump is filling his administration with hard-core members of the religious right. His choice to head the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, John Gore, was the attorney defending North Carolina’s repulsive HB2 law. Falwell Jr. will lead Trump’s education task force. Mike Huckabee’s daughter, Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, is a deputy communications offer. Huckabee-Sanders ran a group attacking Liz Cheney for supporting marriage equality during her 2012 Congressional campaign, even though she was against it. The administration has been slow to populate open positions, but given the track record so far, we’re in no hurry.

4. Making white Christian nationalism a core principle

A rigorous political theorist, Trump is not. But there is a guiding principle emerging in the administration, thanks to the power that former Breitbart head Steve Bannon has amassed as Trump’s number one advisor. Bannon views the world through the ludicrous lens of white Christianity locked in a war with radical Islam. A lot of attention has been paid to his focus on Islam, thanks to the Muslim travel ban. But the Christianity part is equally scary, particularly in a nation where being secular means you are far more likely to be pro-gay.  The religious right knows just what it means, though. That’s why Trump made a point of stressing that Christians will be given favored status under the travel ban.

5. Repealing the Johnson Amendment

Right now, thanks to a law that Lyndon Johnson introduced when he was a Senator, nonprofits can’t engage in political activity. Trump wants to “totally destroy” the measure, which would allow churches to spend money they collect on political campaigns. No wonder that far-right groups like Alliance Defending Freedom are gung-ho for its repeal. If you think it’s bad now, imagine how much worse it will be when pastors can start throwing money around as well. Of course it will open the doors for liberal pastors to do the same, marking the start of the religious fundraising wars at a time when denominations should surely be focusing on helping the needy.

6. Access for Christian media

Where did Trump turn to talk about his Muslim ban? Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network. The White House has decided that the mainstream media is, in Bannon’s words, “the opposition party.” (Which is true, in the sense that the media is opposed to lies.) That means that friendly outlets are going to be Trump’s preferred vehicle. Jerry Falwell Jr. is boasting that Trump is paying attention to the Christian media, who in turn can boost Trump on their programs and social media accounts.

www.queerty.com/donald-trump-single-handedly-brought-religious-right-back-dead-20170221?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Seth Meyers Mocks Sad, Friendless, Meatloaf-Eating ‘Buffoon’ Donald Trump: WATCH

Seth Meyers Mocks Sad, Friendless, Meatloaf-Eating ‘Buffoon’ Donald Trump: WATCH

meatloaf

“On the one hand, you’ve got the genuinely ominous things he’s done, from declaring the free press an ‘enemy of the American people’ to preemptively blaming a judge for future terror attacks,” said Seth Meyers in his latest “Closer Look” segment, and then you have “the everyday weirdness of life in the Trump era.”

Such as forcing Chris Christie to order the meatloaf at their White House meeting.

Quipped Meyers: “Of course, the meatloaf was actually a second course for Christie after Trump made him swallow his pride. Also, that whole conversation sounded like mafia slang.”

And the White House’s other sad stumbles, like keeping Secretary of State Rex Tillerson out of the loop while deciding that he was going to reject a two state solution for Israel, publishing a photo of his all-white White House (“What has 26 thumbs and no black friends?), the constant chaos disrupting the GOP agenda, and Trump’s inability to find people who want to work as National Security Advisor.

Meyers also looked at Trump’s attacks on the news media, continued at his reelection rally in Florida.

“And yet, as he does so often, Trump transitioned seamlessly from claiming that the media makes up fake stories to making up his own fake stories.”

Like the terrorist attack in Sweden. “Sweden!”, said Trump. “Who would believe this? Sweden?”

Said Meyers: “Who would believe this? The answer is no one, because, as fact checkers pointed out, no incident occurred in Sweden on Friday night.”

Watch:

The post Seth Meyers Mocks Sad, Friendless, Meatloaf-Eating ‘Buffoon’ Donald Trump: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Seth Meyers Mocks Sad, Friendless, Meatloaf-Eating ‘Buffoon’ Donald Trump: WATCH

Travellers in Time – director Noel Anderson with leading lady Kelly Cupo in the recording studio. Travellers is one of the lead songs from Audrey Hepburn and I Consider Our Assets. www.audreypopmusical.com #director #musicals #lgbt #sydney #melbourne

Travellers in Time – director Noel Anderson with leading lady Kelly Cupo in the recording studio. Travellers is one of the lead songs from Audrey Hepburn and I Consider Our Assets. www.audreypopmusical.com #director #musicals #lgbt #sydney #melbourne

noelanderson1 posted a photo:

photos/99255577@N08/33032299535/" title="Travellers in Time - director Noel Anderson with leading lady Kelly Cupo in the recording studio. Travellers is one of the lead songs from Audrey Hepburn and I Consider Our Assets. www.audreypopmusical.com #director #musicals #lgbt #sydney #melbourne“>Travellers in Time - director Noel Anderson with leading lady Kelly Cupo in the recording studio. Travellers is one of the lead songs from Audrey Hepburn and I Consider Our Assets. <a href=www.audreypopmusical.com #director #musicals #lgbt #sydney #melbourne“>

Travellers in Time - director Noel Anderson with leading lady Kelly Cupo in the recording studio. Travellers is one of the lead songs from Audrey Hepburn and I Consider Our Assets. www.audreypopmusical.com #director #musicals #lgbt #sydney #melbourne