Kim Davis supporters hold rally at jail

Kim Davis supporters hold rally at jail

As Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis sits in a cell for ignoring a judge’s order, she can take comfort her supporters are rallying outside the jail.

According to Reuters, today (5 September) around 200 people congregated on a field across from the the Carter County Detention Center in Grayson, Kentucky. Davis has been there since Thursday after her she declined to follow a federal judge’s order to issue marriage certificates to same-sex couples.

‘God is going to continue to bless Kim Davis,’ Grayson Mayor George Steele said to the assembled, according to Reuters.

One of the banners held up said the following: ‘Kim Davis POW.’

The 49-year-old clerk been in the center of the national story since marriage equality became legal in all 50 US states. In August, District Judge David Bunning ordered her to issue certificates to LGBTI applicants. She appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court. The highest court in the country denied her emergency request to not issue marriage licenses to any couplesgay or straight – as she fought in the lower court.

Despite losing with the Supreme Court, Davis continued to defy Bunning’s order. She was held in contempt and placed in jail. Since her absence, deputy Rowan County clerks have signed certificates.

Davis lawyers promise she will continue to fight the judge’s order. They also insisted any marriage documents issued are not legal.

Davis, a Democrat who has been married four times, is a member of the Apostolic Christian Church. That denomination takes a literal reading of the Bible.

Her refusal to follow the law has been hailed by marriage equality opponents Senator Ted Cruz and former Governor Mike Huckabee. Both are running for the Republican presidential nomination.

The post Kim Davis supporters hold rally at jail appeared first on Gay Star News.

James Withers

www.gaystarnews.com/article/kim-davis-supporters-hold-rally-at-jail/

Vatican Says Transgender Individuals Can’t Be Godparents

Vatican Says Transgender Individuals Can’t Be Godparents

vaticanThe Vatican gave an official answer to a Spanish bishop seeking clarification on its transgender policy, stating that transgender individuals are unfit to be godparents reports The Journal.

Spanish Bishop Rafael Zornoza Boy stated that he asked for official clarification after his congregation expressed confusion on the official teaching of the matter. Zornoza Boy posted on his diocese’s website that Pope Francis has stated several times that transgender identity goes against Catholic dogma of what man’s nature is.

The Vatican states that its decision is not based on discrimination but is rather a classification requirement of the Church’s standards to becoming a godparent.

Pope Francis has shown progress with LGB people, but the Church still seems to hold the T part of the acronym in low regard.

The post Vatican Says Transgender Individuals Can’t Be Godparents appeared first on Towleroad.


Anthony Costello

Vatican Says Transgender Individuals Can’t Be Godparents

Kim Davis' Attorney Compares Her To Jews Living In Nazi Germany, Invokes Images Of Gas Chambers

Kim Davis' Attorney Compares Her To Jews Living In Nazi Germany, Invokes Images Of Gas Chambers

An attorney for Kim Davis, who was jailed Thursday after being found in contempt of court for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Rowan County, Kentucky, compared the clerk’s situation to the one Jews were faced with in Nazi Germany.

Mathew Staver, who is currently serving as head legal counsel for Davis, made the comparison on the “Crosstalk” radio show Wednesday, RightWingWatch.com reported. 

“[Davis is] there to do a duty, a job and the job duty was changed,” Staver argued. “Does that mean that if you’re Christian, don’t apply here? … What happened in Nazi Germany, what happened there first, they removed the Jews from government public employment, then they stopped patronizing them in their private businesses, then they continued to stigmatize them, then they were the ‘problems,’ then they killed them.”

Staver doubled down on his Nazi Germany comparison on Thursday on “Washington Watch,” a radio show hosted by Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, going so far as to invoke images of gas chambers while doing so, RightWingWatch.com noted.

“Back in the 1930s, it began with the Jews, where they were evicted from public employment, then boycotted in their private employment, then stigmatized and that led to the gas chambers,” Staver told Perkins. “This is the new persecution of Christians here in this country.”

“You cannot obey something that is contrary to God’s law,” Staver continued. “And we would easily say, well, what would happen if the government forced you to turn over a Jew in Nazi Germany? All of us would say we wouldn’t do that, we wouldn’t listen to that. Well, we’re about ready to walk into the moment.”

Davis, who was taken into custody on Thursday, is expected to remain in jail for at least a week while her lawyers appeal the ruling.

They’re not gonna let her out and she’s not gonna bow… I promise you that,” Davis’ husband, Joe, told the press Thursday. He also argued that his wife had been put in jail “illegally” and vowed to “ask [Kentucky Gov. Steve] Beshear to do his job or step down.”

Carter County jailer R.W. Boggs told WKYT that Davis wouldn’t be receiving any special treatment while incarcerated, Towleroad reported.“My job is to keep the door locked until the judge tells me to unlock it. As far as we’re concerned, it was just another day in the neighborhood,” he said.

Boggs added, “It’s a day in jail — breakfast, lunch, dinner and daily activities. It’s not glamorous, it’s not exciting. It’s jail.”

Meanwhile, the Rowan County clerk’s office began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, including James Yates and William Smith Jr., who, thanks to Davis’ refusal to serve them, had to apply six times before finally receiving their license. 

Also on HuffPost:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/49993835/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A90C0A50Ckim0Edavis0Enazi0Egermany0Eattorney0In0I80A933260Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

Children of same-sex parents share their views on gender

Children of same-sex parents share their views on gender

Same-sex parents have taken to social media to share their children’s views on gender.

As part of a new study, started by the samesexparents Instagram account, children aged between four and ten years old were asked a series of questions around gender, including whether boys and girls had to do specific jobs because of their gender, what they should look like, and whether they should like certain colors.

The idea behind the research was to build on the 2014 research carried out by Dr Simon Crouch from the University of Melbourne, who found that children from same-sex parent families scored around 6% higher on general health and family cohesion compared to children of heterosexual parents.

So far, 14 parents have shared their children’s honest and open-minded responses.

When asked ‘What jobs does a girl do when she grows up?’ one child, Rainer, responded: ‘Any jobs that boys can do. And boys can do hair salons if they want, and make up styles.’

Emma said: ‘Any kind. Teach ballet classes or karate classes or anything they want.’

The children were also asked how they would feel if they were told they could not join in a game because of their gender.

Jacob, who could teach us all a thing or two about self-acceptance, said: ‘I would say you can’t necessarily say that because everyone is different and I shouldn’t listen to what you say because I like myself and you should care about other people.’

Samesexparents’ Gemma told Gay Star News she was surprised by the children’s maturity displayed in their answers – although she expected them not to have a stereotypical view of gender as a result of their upbringing.

‘Not one of the children listed a stereotypical male or female job when asked what jobs a boy and a girl do when they grow up,’ she said.

‘This is extremely uplifting to know that the children believe they can be anything that they want to be and do not have to default to gender stereotypes when it comes to deciding what career they wish to pursue.

‘The responses to the question “Is it okay for a boy to dress up as a princess and a girl to dress up as a pirate when playing dress up games?” are by far our favourite.

‘All 14 children agreed that this was okay, this was acceptable and this was nothing to be ashamed or embarrassed about.

‘You often hear of adults criticising other parents for letting their child dress in clothes “for the opposite gender”, in fear that the child will get bullied or teased by other children, but you will find that children are very open and accepting, and in most cases it’s only the adults who are unaccepting of it.’

Gemma and samesexparents are still accepting submissions via their Instagram account from children of same-sex parents aged between four and ten.

Read the full list of questions and a selection of responses below:

Q: What is the difference between a boy and a girl? Favorite answer: “I honestly think there is no difference.” Q: Girls like pink, boys like blue. Is this correct? Favorite answer: “They both like pink and they both like blue.” Q: What jobs does a boy do when he grows up? Favorite answer: “Different kind of jobs, they can do hair or be police officers or work at McDonald’s, anything they want.” Q: What jobs does a girl do when she grows up? Favorite answer: “Any jobs that boys can do. And boys can do hair salons if they want, and makeup styles.” Q: Girls should have long hair and boys should have short hair, do you think that’s true? Favorite answer: “No. Girls can have long hair if they want and short hair if they want. Boys can have long hair or short hair if they want.” Q: Most shops separate children’s toys into toys for boys and toys for girls, do you think shops should keep doing this? Favorite answer: “No they are all just toys.” Q: How would it make you feel if someone told you that you couldn’t join in with playing a game because you are a boy/girl? Favorite answer: “I would say you can’t necessarily say that because everyone is different and I shouldn’t listen to what you say because I like myself and you should care about other people.” Q: Is it okay for a boy to dress up as a princess and a girl to dress up as a pirate when playing dress up games? Favorite answer: “Yes because some people don’t feel comfortable in boy clothes and some people don’t feel comfortable in girl clothes.” Q: Do boys still cry when they are grown ups? Do girls? Favorite answer: “Yes, yes everybody can cry, everyone in the world can cry.” Want to read more? Head over to our website! All of the responses we have received so far are shared on our new ‘Gender Study’ page! Link to our website is in the bio. Comment below & let us know what you think!

A photo posted by @samesexparents on

The post Children of same-sex parents share their views on gender appeared first on Gay Star News.

Mel Spencer

www.gaystarnews.com/article/children-of-same-sex-parents-share-their-views-on-gender/

Texas To Fight Request For $741K From Attorneys In Gay Marriage Lawsuit

Texas To Fight Request For $741K From Attorneys In Gay Marriage Lawsuit

Deleon, texas

Attorneys for same-sex couples in Texas’ federal gay marriage lawsuit are requesting more than $740,000 in fees and costs from the state.

However, just as they bitterly fought to defend Texas’ marriage ban, attorneys for the state are expected to oppose the plaintiffs’ motion for fees and costs.

The 27-page motion filed Friday, by attorneys from Akin Gump Straus Hauer & Feld, seeks $720,794 in fees and $20,203 in costs.

LaneThe Texas Observer reports on the motion for fees and costs:

Akin Gump represented two same-sex couples in De Leon v. Perry, which was filed in October 2013 and resolved pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 26 ruling in favor of same-sex marriage. Under federal law, prevailing parties in civil rights cases are typically eligible for fees and costs.

“Our task on behalf of our clients was to attack and uproot unjust laws that were tightly embraced by the entire elected statewide leadership of Texas, a state with virtually unlimited resources to defend those unjust laws,” Akin Gump’s Neel Lane (right), the lead attorney in the case, wrote in a declaration supporting the motion. “Had the State of Texas not deprived our clients of their constitutional rights, they in turn would not have had to engage attorneys, and this motion for attorneys’ fees and costs would have been unnecessary. If the State is not held accountable for the legal costs it caused to be incurred, then it will be more likely to engage in similar objectionable conduct in the future.”

Akin Gump represented same-sex couples Cleopatra DeLeon and Nicole Dimetman (above), and Mark Phariss and Vic Holmes. A federal judge struck down the state’s marriage ban in February 2014, but stayed his decision pending an appeal. The state took the case to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments in January but didn’t rule until after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.

In their motion for fees and costs, Akin Gump indicates that the state has already raised objections to it. From The Austin Statesman:

Lawyers for the attorney general’s office are expected to argue that the Texas couples cannot be considered “prevailing parties” because Texas law changed as a result of a June opinion by the U.S. Supreme Court, a legal action they were not part of, the motion said.

But Neel Lane, the lead lawyer for the two couples, disputed that assertion, saying their lawsuit prompted Garcia to declare the Texas ban unconstitutional in February 2014 — delaying enforcement of his ruling only while Texas appealed. The lawsuit eventually led Garcia to issue a permanent injunction barring Texas from enforcing a state law and a constitutional amendment that prohibited gay marriage, Lane said.

Even after the high court’s ruling, the state continued to deny accurate birth and death certificates to same-sex couples, until Garcia threatened to hold Attorney General Ken Paxton in contempt. The motion also notes that Paxton issued an opinion in the wake of the ruling that effectively encouraged county clerks with religious objections to refuse to issue same-sex marriage licenses.

Read the full motion below.

The post Texas To Fight Request For $741K From Attorneys In Gay Marriage Lawsuit appeared first on Towleroad.


John Wright

Texas To Fight Request For $741K From Attorneys In Gay Marriage Lawsuit

If Not God's Authority, Whose? Where Did Marriage Come From?

If Not God's Authority, Whose? Where Did Marriage Come From?
Who invented marriage?

Rowan County, Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis says her God did. That’s why she’s been denying marriage licenses, citing “God’s authority” and “God’s definition of marriage.” This is ridiculous on so many levels I don’t know where to start. (Actually, I do: Jail. Which is where Mrs. Davis is finally, deservedly sitting.)

But Rowan’s not alone. A lot of people are staking claim to the tradition of marriage. I’m not surprised; now that Kombucha’s huge, everyone’s like: “Oh, yeah. I’ve been putting that on my Cheerios for years.”

We do this “we did it first” thing all the time. Gather a bunch of hoop-a-philes around a beer keg and they’ll swear Americans invented everything about basketball. Forgetting that the Mayans had a ball and hoop came called “pitz” centuries earlier.

Yes, it occasionally involved using a decapitated head instead of a ball. But it’s nearly come to that at a Detroit Pistons game once or twice, so who cares about the difference?

Mike Huckabee cares – about marriage, anyway. I have no idea what he thinks about shooting hoops with heads. Although as mad as he’s gotten, I can’t imagine he’d be any more offended than he is by marriage equality: “For me … this is not just a political issue. It is a biblical issue.”

Candidates and clerks aren’t the only ones playing the Christian tradition card. In Iowa, one couple has decided to erect 1,000 billboards promoting their Christian view of marriage. An especially nice touch? They have a quote from God on the board. “Please… I need your help with this.”

This is nonsense. For one thing, as anyone who’s ever heard God knows, he only speaks in all capital letters. Secondly, however, it’s not like everyone who walks down the center aisle is doing so in the Christian tradition.

Except they kinda are. (I know, I know… But stay with me.)

The center aisle is a traditional meeting ground in the Christian faith. Similarly: seating the family on opposite sides, the father giving away the bride, a white wedding dress, exchanging rings, the wedding reception and even throwing rice. At least one of these has been a part of every wedding I’ve ever been to, and all of them can have roots in Christian tradition. Perhaps it’s understandable why some Christians are so possessive of the institution.

That doesn’t mean conservative Christians have a right to be rabidly territorial about marriage. Marriage pre-dates Christianity by thousands of years. The Aboriginal people of Australia have a strong marriage tradition, a society that dates back at least 30,000 years.

In China, the tradition of weddings goes back to about the third century B.C. Here, too, there’s a tradition of gifts and a reception following the wedding. Apparently, Christians didn’t really invent the post-wedding party, either. (Please don’t tell Mr. Huckabee, he’s having a hard enough week.)

Does that mean that all those drunken toasts by the best man and endless plates of chicken alfredo are in the Chinese tradition? No, (although in all fairness it should be noted the Chinese did invent pasta).

For one thing, if marriage as we know it was coming from China, WalMart would have been selling it to everyone – gays, straights, Mike Huckabee – for the past 30 years.

More importantly, however, this points out that it’s impossible to answer the question I started with. No one “invented” marriage. It’s not something you can pin a date on, like the creation of the atomic bomb, patenting the typewriter, or who invented the car.

OK, I lied; it’s exactly like the car.

Many people believe Henry Ford invented the car, but he didn’t. He did, however, popularize it with his famous Model T, making it part of the American culture. So much so that many people errantly think he invented the automobile.

Indeed, much of what we associate with the modern car didn’t come from Ford at all. The electric starter, an all-steel body, a single foot pedal to operate the brakes: Ford didn’t invent any of these things, nor have them on his original Model T. They came from other companies, like Cadillac and Dodge.

Automobiles – like marriage – are what we recognize today because the world changes, and the things we use evolve to adapt to that change. As you might expect, Huckabee wants no part of this: “It’s really not my place to just say, ‘OK, I’m just going to evolve.'”

The irony is, you’d think as an educated Baptist Minister Huckabee would be glad that the definition of marriage has evolved – especially the Christian version. In the Old Testament, wives were basically property, polygamy was allowed, and, at times, a woman who had been raped had to marry her attacker.

The New Testament is certainly better. Although even there some interpret the Bible to say celibacy was a better life than marriage. Only if celibacy wasn’t for you was it appropriate to go ahead and get hitched. Though this doesn’t even begin to explain the Kardashians and Billy Bob Thornton.

Evolution and change is the nature of all things. Ironically, one American who did understand this was Ford, though he didn’t always. So stubborn to change his Model T, he once said: “Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants so long as it is black.”

By 1927, however, sales of the Model T had fallen 80 percent since 1922. Almost too late, Ford realized his greatest triumph had failed to adapt. From this hard-earned lesson came the Model A, a car that once again sold millions. Ford even eventually offered the car in red, orange, yellow, green, and blue. Deciding that while black was nice, his cars would serve society and the company better with the colors of the rainbow.

Just like marriage.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/49991247/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Craina0Ebowe0Cif0Enot0Egods0Eauthority0Ewho0Ib0I80A90A5880Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

ESPN’s Israel Gutierrez comes out and talks self-acceptance in blog post

ESPN’s Israel Gutierrez comes out and talks self-acceptance in blog post

ESPN reporter Israel Gutierrez, 38, came out Friday with an emotional blog post.

In the post, titled: ‘Thanks for Reading‘, he describes the struggle in his twenties of not wanting to be gay—and how this all changed when he met his now fiancé David Kitchen.

Gutierrez used the blog to announce he is getting married on September 12.

However he also wanted to speak out for other people struggling with their sexuality, and not living their lives openly.

‘More than anything, I just want to tell my story. It’s probably going to feel like too much information to some of you. But it’s the best way I know to explain what life can be like for conflicted, confused gay men and women everywhere, so I appreciate you putting up with me.’

He notes he’d go to gay bars, but never felt at home there. The post paints a picture of him walking around a bar a few times nervously before entering, but leaving soon after. ‘”I don’t fit in. This isn’t me. Nobody in this place knows what I’m going through,” [I’d think]… Every time, I’d end up unhappier when I left.’

In a particularly moving passage, he describes how: ‘Starting in my early teens until somewhere in my late 20s, I’d blow out my birthday candles with the same wish: “Please don’t let me be gay.”’

Gutierrez says he was especially inspired by Gareth Thomas’ coming out, a British Rugby player who announced he was gay in late 2009. He said meeting his later fiancé in May 2009 ‘changed’ his life, and only two weeks later he started coming out to friends and family.

The religious community with which he is close also provided challenges, but he says: ‘In a sense, all the prayer worked because I eventually saw my true self, and I’ve never been happier.’

If my story makes a difference in any way, it’s the all that really matters to me. Thanks a ton for the responses. Can’t keep up with them.

— Israel Gutierrez (@IzGutierrez) September 4, 2015

He joins LZ Granderson and Kate Fagan as openly gay journalists at ESPN, as well as Nate Silver, who is editor of ESPN-owned Five Thirty Eight.

The post ESPN’s Israel Gutierrez comes out and talks self-acceptance in blog post appeared first on Gay Star News.

Jack Flanagan

www.gaystarnews.com/article/espns-israel-gutierrez-comes-out-and-talks-self-acceptance-in-blog-post/

Cristiano Ronaldo Finds A Place For His Head; Andy Cohen & Anderson Cooper Wear Matching Towels

Cristiano Ronaldo Finds A Place For His Head; Andy Cohen & Anderson Cooper Wear Matching Towels

This week, Steve Grand accepted a date with a hot marine, there’s speculation that Rosie O’Donnell and Tatum O’Neal are more than friends and Eddie Redmayne becomes The Danish Girl in the film’s stunning trailer. Here’s what happened on Instagram:

Come over here, Cristiano Ronaldo. Rest your head on my pillow.

A photo posted by Cristiano Ronaldo (@cristiano) on

   Colton Haynes is all about making the necessary sacrifice.

Show us your other tricks, Kellan Lutz.

Joaquin Ferreira put a ring on it.

With scruff or without, Raul Castillo is perfect.

Just two silver foxes hanging out in towels…

A photo posted by Andy Cohen (@bravoandy) on

Which Hudson wore it better: Oliver or Kate?

Keep practicing, Ryan Lochte.

Tyson Beckford pretty much owns Vegas these days.

Current mood @chippendales #teamtyson #summersexy #vegas

A photo posted by Tyson C. Beckford (@tysoncbeckford) on

Ladies and gentlemen, the unbreakable Nick Adams and Tituss Burgess.

A photo posted by Nick Adams (@thenickadams) on

Michael Lucas likes something he can get a grip on.

Grab a hold of what’s yours! #LucasMen #LucasEntertainment

A photo posted by Michael Lucas (@michaellucasnyc) on

Zachary Quinto ponders the meaning of Vulcan life.

We knows ways to make you happy, River Viiperi.

I just want to be happy… ?

A photo posted by RiverViiperi (@riverviiperi) on

Another day, another homocentric post from James Franco.

Every day is biceps day for Billy Reilich, AKA known as Ellen’s gardener.

Jeremy Kinser

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/uQg2gdHxdnE/cristiano-ronaldo-finds-a-place-for-his-head-andy-cohen-anderson-cooper-wear-matching-towels-20150905

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Peels Away Kim Davis’s Legal Arguments in Heated Interview with Mat Staver: WATCH

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Peels Away Kim Davis’s Legal Arguments in Heated Interview with Mat Staver: WATCH

chris hayes

Incarcerated Kentucky clerk Kim Davis’s lawyer Mat Staver appeared on Chris Hayes’s MSNBC show yesterday and the the testy exchange between the two put a spotlight on the fact that Davis doesn’t have a legal leg to stand on in her anti-gay crusade.

Staver started the interview with by claiming Davis was “innocent” of any crime, an assertion that Hayes pointed out was patently false. Hayes then asked if Staver would still be defending Davis if she refused to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples on religious grounds. Staver punted on the question and after a bit of back and forth (and talking over one another) Hayes asked Staver point blank:

Mr. Staver there are allies of yours who have been talking to reporters saying that they think you are taking Kim Davis for a ride and basically raising money off her plight. How are you doing on fundraising this week?

Unsurprisingly, Staver wasn’t pleased with the question:

 Anyone who asks that question does not know Kim Davis. Kim Davis has a strong conviction and conscience. She contacted us for representations. We are representing her. I can tell you we are putting in a whole lot more money into the cost and expenses then we would ever get out of this case. This was never about fundraising. This is about protecting someone’s conscience.

The post MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Peels Away Kim Davis’s Legal Arguments in Heated Interview with Mat Staver: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Kyler Geoffroy

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Peels Away Kim Davis’s Legal Arguments in Heated Interview with Mat Staver: WATCH