Ian McKellen Asked A Straight Friend To Draw A Diagram To Help Him Play A Love Scene With A Woman

Ian McKellen Asked A Straight Friend To Draw A Diagram To Help Him Play A Love Scene With A Woman

936full-ian-mckellenI thought I wouldn’t be very good at it because I hadn’t had any experience of it. Yes, I was — it was a bother to me. I also used to say to myself — not often, but I did — I can’t let people know I’m gay, otherwise they won’t be able to accept me as being straight in the play or the movie. Well, it’s not true. It doesn’t worry – I don’t care about any actor’s private life. I don’t — their sexuality is of interest, but the point is, is the character they’re playing convincing? Do I believe them? So I think it was just an excuse. And I didn’t want to cut myself off from the possibility of playing Macbeth or King Lear or many of the — Uncle Vanya — parts that are resolutely straight. And that would be, for me, cutting off my nose to spite my face.

However, the first job I took as an actor after having come out was to play as resolute a heterosexual as I could find. And that was a disgraced British politician called John Profumo, who, in the movie Scandal, his story is told about how he lied to Parliament about having had an affair with a prostitute, which he inadvertently shared with a Russian spy. So that wouldn’t do for a cabinet minister.

All right, I played this part on film. And my first job was to appear to be having sex with Joanne Whalley-Kilmer in the marital bed. Well, this would’ve been a joyful scene for any straight actor to play. She’s extremely beautiful and a lovely person, and I didn’t know what to do with her. So I went to a friend, Edward Petherbridge, the actor, who knows about these things. And I said, Edward, I’ve got to do this love scene. Can you explain to me — can you draw me a little diagram? So he did. He gave me some stick figures…Showed me what was possible. So I’m now an expert on the missionary position, and everything went well.”

 

Sir Ian McKellen speaking with NPR about concerns he had playing straight love scenes when he was still a closeted actor

Jeremy Kinser

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/YKSEiu9AGGM/ian-mckellen-asked-a-straight-friend-to-draw-a-diagram-to-help-him-play-a-love-scene-with-a-woman-20150721

WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson Covers 16 Billion Years Of Universal Evolution In 8 Minutes

WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson Covers 16 Billion Years Of Universal Evolution In 8 Minutes

Screen Shot 2015-07-20 at 3.18.41 PM

American astrophysicist and cosmologist Neil deGrasse Tyson wrote and narrated a YouTube piece for Minute Physics called A Brief History of Everything, with the scientist explaining and condensing the epic 16 billion year history of the universe into a succinct eight minute video.

While the basic concept of the Big Bang is commonly known, Tyson delves further into detail regarding the composition of our universe and the forces that made it along with interesting tidbits on how our universe could’ve resulted in a universe filled only with light without the forces of gravity and elemental properties forming what we know today.

Watch Tyson condense 16 billion years into just eight minutes, below:

The post WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson Covers 16 Billion Years Of Universal Evolution In 8 Minutes appeared first on Towleroad.


Anthony Costello

WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson Covers 16 Billion Years Of Universal Evolution In 8 Minutes

Open Trans Military Service — the Final Barrier to Full Inclusion Falls

Open Trans Military Service — the Final Barrier to Full Inclusion Falls
The next time a trans person is rejected for employment, she needs to quote Sue Fulton, the first openly lesbian chair of the U.S. Military Academy Board of Visitors:

We have trans Marines defending our country. What’s your excuse?

Last Monday, July 13, the Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter, announced that the Pentagon’s regulations banning open trans military service are outdated, and ordered a six month review which will end with the inclusion of trans servicemembers alongside their gay, lesbian and bisexual compatriots. The six month review gives the Pentagon time to handle the medical, administrative and legal issues that will revise the regulations to apply fairly to trans persons. When the review is complete, the last impediment to a group of Americans willing to enlist or be commissioned in the armed forces will be gone, and the current 15,500 servicemembers serving in the closet will be able to come out.

As the Secretary said:

We have transgender soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines — real, patriotic Americans — who I know are being hurt by an outdated, confusing, inconsistent approach that’s contrary to our value of service and individual merit. The Defense Department’s current regulations regarding transgender service members are outdated and are causing uncertainty that distracts commanders from our core missions.

Brynn Tannehill, Advocacy Director of SPARTA (Service Members, Partners, Allies, for Respect and Tolerance for All), said:

This is an important step towards transgender service members being treated equally with other members of the armed forces. It brings the DoD closer to where the rest of the federal government is on the issue. I’m looking forward to finishing my career in the reserves, and doing so with dignity and honor.

The review group announced by the Secretary will be led by Brad Carson, the acting undersecretary for personnel and readiness, and friend of the trans military community. Six months may seem like a long time, but the new regulations need to deal with implementing name and gender changes, as well as dealing with all the medical considerations related to transition and post-transition medical issues. As The New York Times noted in its editorial praising the decision,

None of this should be hard to carry out. Several of America’s closest allies have seamlessly integrated openly transgender troops in their militaries. Any doubts about their ability to serve should have been put to rest by the exemplary records of those who have begun transitioning publicly in recent months. Their powerful stories commanded the attention of senior leaders at the Pentagon.

So how did this come about, four years after gay men and lesbians began serving openly following the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell? Some people had no idea that trans persons weren’t included in the repeal, and other trans persons were infuriated that they weren’t. Some trans persons wanted nothing to do with trans servicemembers, such as Dean Spade of the Sylvia Rivera Law Project. Others were more concerned with the bread and butter issues that affect their civilian lives.

Looking back, I need to remind people that many trans persons stood with our gay brothers and sisters to obtain open service for them when we knew we could not yet be included. There were many, including Allyson Robinson and Brynn Tannehill, but the person I recall making the biggest impact was Autumn Sandeen, who joined five gay servicemembers in chaining themselves to the White House gates during the GetEqual protest in 2010, and who has continued her advocacy to this day.

Those efforts led to the development of friendships and powerful relationships, and laid the groundwork for the trans effort three years later. But the issue which was fundamental to open trans military service was the declassification of being trans as a mental illness. The image of Corporal Klinger hovered over the Pentagon, until that fundamental change occurred in the DSM 5 revision of December 2012. That effort was thanks to the decade-long leadership of Kelley Winters and others. No longer could anyone outside the Pentagon, nor anyone within, make a serious argument that the 15,500 trans persons serving in the military were mentally ill and, therefore, unqualified.

That number – 15,500 – was derived from research led by the Palm Center, led by Aaron Belkin, in association with the Williams Institute. The Palm Center, with the support of a major donation contributed by Colonel Jennifer Pritzker after her transition, published a nonpartisan report, the “Report of the Planning Commission on Transgender Military Service,” to help the United States join its 18 allied nations in providing full inclusion. The report was led by two co-chairs: Major General Gale S. Pollock, former Acting Army Surgeon General, and Shannon Minter of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, a long-time trans legal advocate. Other committee members included trans advocates Paula Neira, a former Navy Lieutenant. and Kylar Broadus, of the National LGBTQ Task Force.

This blueprint served as a guide for the Pentagon, and the team led by SPARTA pushed forward. I feel it’s important to emphasize that this effort was primarily a trans effort, comprised of a small group of dedicated military and former military professionals who ran this like a military campaign, with the assistance of staunch cis allies, both gay and straight. Foremost among them was Sue Fulton, board chair of SPARTA, the first lesbian chair of the U.S. Military Academy Board of Visitors, and founding board member of both Outserve and KnightsOut. One couldn’t ask for a better friend and ally than Sue Fulton, and her leadership was indispensable.

The team working inside the Pentagon was led by Allyson Robinson, SPARTA’s Director of Policy, who, as the nation’s first trans executive director of a national LGBT organization, had served as Executive Director of Outserve-SLDN. She was joined by Brynn Tannehill as Director of Advocacy, legal experts Paula Neira and Bridget Wilson, and media expert Fiona Dawson who produced the remarkable transmilitary video documentary project, Transgender, At War and In Love, with servicemembers Logan Ireland and Laila Villanueva and which eventually appeared in The New York Times. Landon Wilson was profiled on CBS News after being discharged from the Navy for being trans. Army Captain Jacob Eleazer and Navy Lt. Cmdr. Dr. Jesse Ehrenfeld of the AMA Board of Trustees worked the medical angles post-DSM revision. Mara Keisling of the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), along with Houston’s Lou Weaver, provided logistical support in bringing trans military personnel together, no small thing since the NCTE’s membership was traditionally opposed to supporting the military. Even HRC contributed, by working the Congressional Armed Services Committees to prevent any meddling from the Republican-controlled body across the Potomac.

I don’t want to leave out the many within the Pentagon, including the JAG Corps, who assisted this effort, but prefer to remain anonymous.

The lessons for me in this successful effort are that trans persons are quite capable of taking care of themselves, and when given the right tools, sufficient financial support and a network of supportive allies, are capable of mounting a mission to bring about real equality. A more general lesson is that there are times, as was evident with the slew of marriage lawsuits brought all over the country, when targeted, determined efforts run by small teams are more productive than dependence on the older model of large, well-funded, general service advocacy organizations. Being relatively independent of membership or donor money allows a freedom of action which is oftentimes necessary to get the job done.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/484fb6f5/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Cdana0Ebeyer0Copen0Etrans0Emilitary0Eservi0Ib0I78413880Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

ISIS are giving children ‘dolls’ to behead at training camps

ISIS are giving children ‘dolls’ to behead at training camps

ISIS are giving children ‘dolls’ to behead at training camps, according to reports.

A 14-year-old boy, renamed Yahya by his captors, has come forward after fleeing to speak about the practices carried out by Islamic extremists in northern Iraq.

Abducted by the extremists and forced into radicalism, he says he was shown videos of beheadings and told what types of ‘infidels’ they would have to kill.

These include anyone they consider ‘dirty’, such as Westerners, members of religious minorities, members of Syrian and Iraqi government and its military, as well as LGBTI people. They have called gay people the ‘worst of creatures’.

Yahya said, like more than 120 boys in his camp, they were each given a doll and a sword and told to cut of its head.

‘Then they taught me how to hold the sword, and they told me how to hit. They told me it was the head of the infidels,’ the boy told AP after escaping the training camp.

The training camps are a part of ISIS’ plan to build a new generation of extremist killers, recruiting teens and children using toys, threats and brainwashing.

Yahya has said his little brother, their mother and hundreds of Yazidis were captured when ISIS seized the Iraqi town of Sulagh. Captured, he was taken to a Farouq training camp for boys aged 8 to 15 and given Arabic names to replace their Kurdish ones.

He then spent nearly five months there, training eight to 10 hours a day, including exercises, weapon drills and Quranic studies. If they failed to carry it out, they would be beaten or killed.

Thankfully, Yahya and his family were able to flee to the Iraqi city of Dohuk, where Kurdish people are still free from the control of ISIS.

Last week, an ISIS video showed a boy beheading a Syrian soldier. And last month, a video showed 25 children shooting 25 Syrian soldiers in the head.

The post ISIS are giving children ‘dolls’ to behead at training camps appeared first on Gay Star News.

Joe Morgan

www.gaystarnews.com/article/isis-are-giving-children-dolls-to-behead-at-training-camps/

Following Heated Discussion, Right-Wing Reporter Ben Shapiro Has Filed A Lawsuit Against Transgender Reporter Zoey Tur

Following Heated Discussion, Right-Wing Reporter Ben Shapiro Has Filed A Lawsuit Against Transgender Reporter Zoey Tur

512px-Zoey_Tur_Inside_EditionSnippy Breitbart Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro has filed assault charges against Zoey Tur, the transgender reporter he deliberately provoked by asking, “What are your genetics, sir?”

Tur responded by cooly placing her hand on the back of Shapiro’s neck, icily advising, “You cut that out right now, or you’ll go home in an ambulance.”

Related: Breitbart Says The “Gay Rainbow Flag” Was Responsible For The Chattanooga Terror Attack

“That seems mildly inappropriate for a political discussion,” Shapiro sniffed, clearly rattled.

“You just called me sir.”

“It’s not rude to call someone who is biologically a male is a male.”

“You’re consumed with hatred,” Tur later tells Shapiro. ” You’re a little man. It’s okay… He can be what he wants. Little boy.”

“I come from a basic biological reality,” Shapiro argues. “It’s not a moral thing. If someone wants to mutilate their body, that’s their choice. Cutting off your testicles is mutilation.”

The altercation took place during a panel discussion about Caitlyn Jenner’s recent Arthur Ashe Courage Award on Dr. Drew on Call. In his police report — which Shapiro filed with the Los Angeles Police Department on Sunday morning — he claims Tur continued threatening him after their appearance, a claim which she’s denied. Although, there was this :

Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 11.01.14 AM

We second that.

The whole segment is worth taking a look at, although we should warn you that Shapiro is hyperdelically annoying. You run the risk of ramming your head through the computer screen.

 

h/t: Gay Star News

 

Derek de Koff

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/i_Yh3WcCHks/following-heated-discussion-right-wing-reporter-ben-shapiro-has-filed-a-lawsuit-against-transgender-reporter-zoey-tur-20150721

Homophobic Professor Protests Rainbow Flag On Facebook: ‘It’s The Queers They Should Be Hanging’ – WATCH

Homophobic Professor Protests Rainbow Flag On Facebook: ‘It’s The Queers They Should Be Hanging’ – WATCH

CKUNIM3UwAAp7cM

A professor at St. Lawrence College in Ontario, Canada, has come under fire for a virulent anti-gay post on Facebook.

Rick Coupland posted a story about the city of St. Petersburg, Florida raising a rainbow flag for its Pride festival, adding a comment that read, “It’s the queers they should be hanging, not the flag…”

A former student screenshot the post and reported the professor to school authorities, as The Huffington Post reports. Coupland then posted a follow up saying, “I have to go off Facebook for awhile. I’ve been called into work and told to bring a representative re: my comments on FB. Please pray for me and my job…”

Via The Huffington Post:

Kelly Wiley, SLC’s director of marketing and communications, confirmed that the school is investigating but would not comment on the specific complaint, the Whig-Standard reported.

“We have several policies that apply to the conduct of our employees,” she told the newspaper.

“This includes the fact that we adhere to the Ontario Human Rights Code, we also have harassment policies, a policy around outside activities of college employees, and our collective agreement.”

Coupland was expected to meet with the college on Monday and Tuesday. He said it was “too early” to comment when reached by Metro on Thursday.

Watch a news report on the incident below:

[Image via Twitter]

The post Homophobic Professor Protests Rainbow Flag On Facebook: ‘It’s The Queers They Should Be Hanging’ – WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Sean Mandell

Homophobic Professor Protests Rainbow Flag On Facebook: ‘It’s The Queers They Should Be Hanging’ – WATCH

The Outsider Has Officially Squeezed Its Way Inside The Art World

The Outsider Has Officially Squeezed Its Way Inside The Art World

Character Traits” is the summer exhibition of your wildest, wettest dreams. If, that is, you prefer adorably deformed critters to the formal aspects of picture-making; fart jokes to the histories of aesthetic order and structures; boobies to experiments in monochrome.

Which, let us be clear, we absolutely, most definitely do. 

The exhibition, featuring work from artists including Raina Hamner, Nel Aerts, Brian Scott Campbell and Austin English, feels like someone cracked a “Looney Tunes” episode open and spilled its insides into a frying pan, boiling and scrambling them beyond recognition. The artists on view weave together the influence of sources you wouldn’t find on the white walls of MoMA — sources like outsider art, undercover zines, comic books and thrift store kitsch.  

“I was looking for artists that weren’t generally represented in New York,” artist Matthew Craven, who curated the show, explained to The Huffington Post. “Artists who have more of an interest in cartooning, zines, the stuff I grew up making — the stuff that influenced me that maybe isn’t considered high art by a lot of people. Influences can come from anywhere. Me, personally, I never took an art class until I was 22. I grew up drawing comic books.”

Take Dawn Frasch‘s “Pussy Phanatic,” an overflowing cesspool of visual information. In it, a naked lady, vagina spread open, spews pinkish innards from her genitals, coming to life like it was the pornographic sequel to “Flubber.” The ejection eventually forms its own muppet-like character, who appears dressed up for a baseball game as he vomits blood. It’s all the bad parts of an orgy combined with the even worse parts of an all-you-can-eat buffet.

It’s part of an appealing narrative — plucking the weirdos and perverts from the fringes of the hoity-toity art world and gathering them together for one raucous visual display. Except, the story doesn’t quite hold up. The grotesque, excessive aesthetic of “Character Traits” isn’t an anomaly. In fact, it’s a trend.

In the past year, a number of New York exhibitions have highlighted artists interested in the styles of cartoon animation, underground comics and punk zines. There was “Puddle, Pothole, Portal” at SculptureCenter, “Heartbeats, Hard-ons and Freakouts” at Marlborough Chelsea, “Far Out” at Malborough Chelsea, Trenton Doyle Hancock at the Studio Museum in Harlem. There was Peter Saul’s exhibition of 1960s work at Venus Over Manhattan and “What Nerve! Alternative Figures in American Art, from 1960 to the Present,” chronicling outsiders from Jim Nutt to Niagara to Mike Kelley.

Many of the artists in “What Nerve,” including Saul himself, have been swapping conceptual quandaries for gory details since the ’50s. “Mr. Saul, who was born in San Francisco, started pushing buttons in the late 1950s when he discovered that although he liked the way certain Abstract Expressionist artists painted, he couldn’t stomach the Existentialist mumbo-jumbo that surrounded their work,” Holland Cotter explained in 2008. “So he adopted the brushy style but dumped the pretensions. Instead of spiritual depths, he painted icebox interiors stocked with soft drinks, steaks, daggers, penises and toilets.”

Too many contemporary artists have been inspired by Saul’s gloriously bad taste, many of whom are on view in this exhibit. Then there are people like New Zealand-based artist Susan Te Kahurangi King, who stopped speaking at the age of four and had little contact with Western art history. And yet her work would fit right in in “Character Traits,” a show Craven acknowledges has somewhat of an “outsider” aesthetic. 

“All of these artists are technically skilled,” Craven said, “but they think it’s more interesting to tune into a different side of your brain and look a different way. I think what artists are typically trying to do when you see that ‘outsider aesthetic’… It’s trying to tune out everything you’ve learned before, to really approach your work in a different way. Getting rid of things you’ve learned in the past is sometimes a bigger skill than focusing on the skills you’ve learned over time.”

Craven is also the first to acknowledge the timely relevance of this unlearned aesthetic. “I don’t think that’s a bad thing,” he said. “They own it,” he said of the “Character Traits” bunch. “They put their own spin on it instead of relying on what’s popular at the moment.”

That’s for certain. Raina Hamner’s 2014 “So Much Tenderness Is In My Head, So Much Loneliness In My Bed,” featured above, shows two bald men in matching turtlenecks and tangerine heels clasping hands, pants down. Their dangling penises are complimented by eyeballs and noses, so their nether regions resemble two drooling puppies gazing into each other’s eyes. If a scorned reader of the 1970s children’s books Barbapapas went rogue, this could be the erotic revenge art. 

So, what does it mean when some of the most prestigious galleries and museums across the country adorn their halls with genitalia-happy cartoons? Are art world pretensions giving way to the silly, the sick and and the strange? Or is there a more sinister glint to this turn towards the outsider, a fetishization or appropriation that estranges a style from its original imperative?

Does bringing fringe culture into the spotlight in some way sanitize it or deactivate it? 

The exhibition’s content seems to warn against over-thinking, and I’m taking the hint. “Character Traits” is a show of young artists, most of whom are not yet established or mainstream, making work like the stuff they grew up drooling over. If younger artists are opting for more accessible, democratic and underground material instead of haughty art school theses, there’s no reason for me to complain.

While “Character Traits” bills itself as a fun exhibition of emerging artists, in reality, it’s much more. It’s a precise snapshot of the moment the outside successfully squeezes itself in, and let me tell you, it looks good. 

The exhibition, featuring work by Nel Aerts, Brian Scott Campbell, Austin Eddy, Austin English, Ryan Michael Ford, Dawn Frasch, Raina Hamner, Sojourner Truth Parsons and D’Metrius Rice, runs until August 14, 2015 at Asya Geisberg Gallery in New York.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/484e72b1/sc/38/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C150Cnow0Ethat0Ethe0Ealternative0Ehas0Ebecome0Ecliche0Ean0Ealternative0Eon0Ethe0Ealternative0In0I7840A0A180Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

Gawker editors resign in protest after story outing Conde Nast executive is removed

Gawker editors resign in protest after story outing Conde Nast executive is removed

Two of Gawker’s senior editors have resigned in the wake of the website running a controversial story that outed a senior executive at publishing company Condé Nast.

Tommy Craggs, the Executive Editor of Gawker Media, and Gawker.com editor-in-chief, Max Read, stand by the decision to run the story and suggest that removing it came about because senior management were concerned about losing advertising revenue.

The story was posted last Thursday. Written by Jordan Sargent, it included allegations made by a former porn star (who was granted anonymity by the website), that the media executive concerned – who Gay Star News has chosen not to name – had attempted to hire him for sex.

The article included screenshots of text messages and identified the executive concerned. He is married to a woman and has children. He is not a public figure, but has a brother who previously worked for the Obama administration.

Gawker – which was founded by gay entrepreneur Nick Denton – was immediately criticized by many commentators for appearing to out the executive as gay or bisexual.

Craggs informed Denton of the story on Thursday afternoon, a few hours before it was posted. According to the New York Times Denton expressed reservations but did not ask to read the article before it was posted online later that evening.

On Friday, the story was removed and Denton, who is CEO of Gawker and owns 68% of the company, posted a message saying that running the story was ‘a decision I regret.’

‘This story … does not rise to the level that our flagship site should be publishing.’

This was followed on Monday by a memo from Denton to staff. It said: ‘That post wasn’t what Gawker should stand for, and it is symptomatic of a site that has been out of control of editorial management.

‘Our flagship site carries the same name as the company, and the reputation of the entire company rests on its work. When Gawker itself is seen as sneering and callous, it affects all of us.’

The fallout from the story continues. Yesterday it was announced that Craggs and Read were resigning.

In a posting on Gawker.com, it was made clear that they stood by the decision to publish the original article, and were outraged that Gawker management had voted to remove it.

‘In letters sent today, Craggs and Read informed staff members that the managing partnership’s vote to remove a controversial post … a unprecedented act endorsed by zero editorial employees – represented an indefensible breach of the notoriously strong firewall between Gawker’s business interests and the independence of its editorial staff. Under those conditions, Craggs and Read wrote, they could not possibly guarantee Gawker’s editorial integrity,’ said J.K. Trotter in the posting.

The posting went on to reproduce the letter from Craggs. He says that the vote to remove the article came about because, ‘Advertisers such as Discover and BFGoodrich were either putting holds on their campaigns or pulling out entirely.’

He strongly criticized Gawker’s partners for not informing him or Read that that they were voting on whether to remove the article: ‘None of the partners in a company that prides itself on its frankness had the decency or intellectual wherewithal to make the case to the executive editor of Gawker Media for undermining (if not immolating) his job, forsaking Gawker’s too-often-stated, too-little-tested principles, and doing the most extreme and self-destructive thing a shop like ours could ever do.’

‘All I got at the end of the day was a workshopped email from Denton, asking me to stay on and help him unfuck the very thing he’d colluded with the partners to fuck up.’

Read’s separate letter said: ‘This was not an easy decision. I hope the partnership group recognizes the degree to which it has betrayed the trust of editorial, and takes steps to materially reinforce its independence.’

Gay Star Business have approached Gawker for comment about Read and Craggs’ claims.

It’s not unclear what the motive was behind the publishing of the original article, although Read himself tweeted last Thursday: ‘given the chance gawker will always report on married c-suite executives of major media companies fucking around on their wives.’

given the chance gawker will always report on married c-suite executives of major media companies fucking around on their wives

— max read (@max_read) July 17, 2015

Gawker started life as a media gossip site, brazenly posting stories that other media may have been wary of touching. It has been involved with several controversies in its past, and is currently facing a $100million lawsuit from Hulk Hogan that could potentially bankrupt it.

However, it’s growing popularity and stature has seen it evolve its editorial stance; as Denton claimed last Friday when the article was removed: ‘Gawker is no longer the insolent blog that began in 2003.’

Some commentators have suggested that the controversy reveals a deep split between the management team at Gawker and the editorial staff. Andrew Wallenstein, Co-Editor-In-Chief at Variety, suggested ‘The battle for the soul of Gawker is underway. Presuming the publication has one, that is.’

More evocative still was Ryan Holiday, editor at large for the New York Observer: ‘The site is tearing itself apart. Or maybe, a better image is that old legend about a scorpion surrounded by fire, stinging itself to death.’

 

Image: Dave Winer | Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia commons

The post Gawker editors resign in protest after story outing Conde Nast executive is removed appeared first on Gay Star News.

David Hudson

www.gaystarnews.com/article/gawker-editors-resign-in-protest-after-story-outing-conde-nast-executive-is-removed/