Why Even A 12-Month Ban On Blood Donations From Gay Men Makes No Sense

Why Even A 12-Month Ban On Blood Donations From Gay Men Makes No Sense
The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday ended the lifetime ban on blood donations from men who have sex with men.

But the agency said it would continue to bar donations by men who have had a sexual encounter with another man in the previous year, disappointing prominent gay rights groups and HIV/AIDS researchers, who called the yearlong waiting period medically unnecessary and unscientific. The FDA said the change “will better align the deferral period with that of other men and women at increased risk for HIV infection.”

“The one-year deferral notion constitutes symbolic progress, but is not any more warranted than a lifetime ban,” wrote Dr. Eli Adashi, professor of medical science at Brown University’s Warren Alpert Medical School, in an email to HuffPost.

The 31-year-old ban on donations from gay and bisexual men had its roots in the AIDS fear that was pervasive when the disease first appeared in the nation’s blood supply. Since then, HIV testing has gotten faster and more accurate. Additionally, testing of donated blood for HIV and other diseases is routine.

Over the years, pressure mounted for the FDA to change the ban. The American Medical Association recommended that gay and bisexual men be evaluated individually, and that risk be assessed through behavior, not sexual orientation.

“The lifetime ban on blood donation for men who have sex with men is discriminatory and not based on sound science,” said Dr. William Kobler, an AMA spokesman.

Members of Congress spoke out against the ban.

Gay rights groups also advocated that the FDA drop the gay blood ban, and replace it with screening questions that address specific risky sexual behaviors regardless of sexual orientation or gender.

Aspects of such a system have been in place in Italy since 2001. There, potential blood donors are assessed individually with questionnaires and face-to-face interviews with practitioners.

Adashi co-authored an op-ed in the July issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association that argued a 12-month deferral on donations from gay men is “equally arbitrary” to a lifelong ban.

“Sexual orientation is not a disqualifier; instead, sexual orientation is one component of individualized risk assessment,” Adashi wrote. Research suggests that Italy’s new policy hasn’t led to a disproportionate increase in HIV-positive blood donations from gay men.

The FDA shift still leaves a large swath of gay men — those who only have sex with HIV-negative partners or practice safe sex with HIV-positive partners — unable to donate blood. At the same time, people who may be at risk for HIV are not barred from donating.

Beyond the discriminatory nature of the ban on donations, there is a real need for more blood.

The Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, which studies LGBT issues, has calculated the number of men who would likely donate, and the pints of blood that would become available, under three scenarios: completely lifting the ban, a 12-month deferral, and a five-year deferral.

As you can see, a 12-month deferral excludes thousands of potential donations from the nation’s blood supply.

The risk of getting HIV from a blood transfusion is incredibly low. According to the FDA, one in 2 million cases are acquired through transfusions.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/23/gay-blood-ban-deferral_n_6374374.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Florida County Asks Judge To Clarify Gay Marriage Ruling

Florida County Asks Judge To Clarify Gay Marriage Ruling
By Bill Cotterell

TALLAHASSEE, Fla., Dec 23 (Reuters) – A tiny county in the northern Florida Panhandle, facing the prospect of court-ordered gay marriage going into effect next month, filed an emergency motion on Tuesday asking a federal judge to clarify whether it must marry all gay couples.

The request follows statewide confusion over a U.S. Supreme Court order last week declining to extend a stay on a ruling that found the state’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional. The order cleared the way for gay marriages to begin on Jan. 6.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/23/florida-county-gay-marriage_n_6375080.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Which City Has The Best Pride? Vote Now For Your Chance To Win A Trip For Two

Which City Has The Best Pride? Vote Now For Your Chance To Win A Trip For Two

44269745-994a-49d9-a96e-c18c56caeab5Who wouldn’t want a free trip for two to any destination in the continental U.S.? Don’t miss your chance at this awesome opportunity by voting for the 2014 Best of GayCities, courtesy of our friends at Hyatt.

It’s never too early to start thinking about all the fun that will be had in cities across the globe next summer. Which city hosts the best Pride, anyway?

Is it Tel Aviv, Austin, or Prague?

Maybe Dallas, or Tokyo, or Rome?

Vote for your favorite nominee–or write in your own–in the 2014 Best of GayCities. Just sign into your GayCities account and make your selections. You’ll automatically be entered into the prize sweepstakes.

Polls close January 5. You must be a US resident to win the prize. See the complete rules.

Graham Gremore

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/sTEwnH1VU7Q/which-city-has-the-best-pride-vote-now-for-your-chance-to-win-a-trip-for-two-20141223

Washington County Clerk Wants To Know If All Same-Sex Couples Have The Right To Marry in Florida On Jan. 6

Washington County Clerk Wants To Know If All Same-Sex Couples Have The Right To Marry in Florida On Jan. 6

ClerkDespite the fact that Federal Judge Robert Hinkle ruled the Sunshine State’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, a decision he stayed only until January 6th, a stay which neither the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals nor the U.S. Supreme Court would extend, confusion still exists as to what exactly county clerks in Florida are legally obligated to do when, on January 6, the stay comes to an end and marriage discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is no longer codified in the state’s constitution. 

At least one county clerk in Florida wants to know if she has to marry all gay couples that come to her seeking marriage licenses or just the plaintiffs in the case in question. The Miami Herald reports:

Lawyers for Washington County Clerk Lora Bell on Tuesday filed an emergency motion with U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle asking whether she must give a marriage license to just the one same-sex couple named in Florida’s federal gay marriage lawsuit or to all same-sex couples who come to her office on Jan. 6.

“The Clerk requests clarification as to whether the Injunction requires that the Clerk only issue marriage licenses to Stephen Schlairet and Ozzie Russ as specifically set forth in the Injunction, both of whom are parties to this matter, or if the Injunction requires that the Clerk issue marriage licenses to all same-sex couples who apply once the stay expires at the end of the day on January 5, 2015,” lawyers wrote to Hinkle.

Meanwhile, foes of equality are trying to scare county clerks from enacting Hinkle’s decision by threatening them with criminal charges and fines. The New Civil Rights Movement reports:

“[Enter] the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, which represents the Florida Association of Court Clerks. Greenberg Traurig has sent a letter advising Florida clerks in every county but Washington County in northern Florida where Judge Hinkle presides, that the ruling does not apply to them. The letter warns that clerks who issue a same-sex couple a marriage license could be charged with committing “a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment of not more than one year and a fine of not more than $1,000.”

In the wake of this incendiary and bigoted memo, Executive Director of Equality Florida Nadine Smith was quick to point out, “A law firm memo does not override a federal judge’s order and the actions of the 11th Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.” 

Developing…


Sean Mandell

www.towleroad.com/2014/12/washington-county-clerk-wants-to-know-if-all-same-sex-couples-have-the-right-to-marry-in-florida-on-.html